利用机器学习技术预测人工耳蜗的适配。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004205
Hajime Koyama, Akinori Kashio, Tatsuya Yamasoba
{"title":"利用机器学习技术预测人工耳蜗的适配。","authors":"Hajime Koyama, Akinori Kashio, Tatsuya Yamasoba","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences in electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and postoperative mapping current (T) levels between electrode types after cochlear implantation, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting postoperative T levels.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We reviewed the charts of 124 ears of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We compared ECAP thresholds and T levels from different electrodes, calculated correlations between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and created five prediction models of T levels at switch-on and 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The accuracy of prediction in postoperative mapping current (T) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ECAP thresholds of the slim modiolar electrodes were significantly lower than those of the straight electrodes on the apical side. However, there was no significant difference in the neural response telemetry thresholds between the two electrodes on the basal side. Lasso regression achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels at switch-on, and the random forest algorithm achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels 6 months after surgery in this dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning techniques could be useful for accurately predicting postoperative T levels after cochlear implantation in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Cochlear Implant Fitting by Machine Learning Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Koyama, Akinori Kashio, Tatsuya Yamasoba\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences in electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and postoperative mapping current (T) levels between electrode types after cochlear implantation, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting postoperative T levels.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We reviewed the charts of 124 ears of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We compared ECAP thresholds and T levels from different electrodes, calculated correlations between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and created five prediction models of T levels at switch-on and 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The accuracy of prediction in postoperative mapping current (T) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ECAP thresholds of the slim modiolar electrodes were significantly lower than those of the straight electrodes on the apical side. However, there was no significant difference in the neural response telemetry thresholds between the two electrodes on the basal side. Lasso regression achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels at switch-on, and the random forest algorithm achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels 6 months after surgery in this dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning techniques could be useful for accurately predicting postoperative T levels after cochlear implantation in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估人工耳蜗植入术后不同电极类型的电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)阈值和术后映射电流(T)水平的差异、ECAP阈值和T水平之间的相关性,以及机器学习技术在预测术后T水平方面的性能:背景:三级医院地点:三级医院:干预措施:比较 ECAP 阈值和 T 水平:我们比较了来自不同电极的ECAP阈值和T水平,计算了ECAP阈值和T水平之间的相关性,并创建了5个T水平预测模型,用于预测开机时和术后6个月的T水平:主要结果指标:术后映射电流(T)水平预测的准确性:结果:细长的小叶电极的ECAP阈值明显低于心尖侧的直电极。然而,基底侧两个电极的神经反应遥测阈值没有明显差异。在该数据集中,Lasso 回归对开关机时的 T 水平预测最为准确,随机森林算法对术后 6 个月的 T 水平预测最为准确:机器学习技术有助于准确预测儿童人工耳蜗植入术后的 T 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Cochlear Implant Fitting by Machine Learning Techniques.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and postoperative mapping current (T) levels between electrode types after cochlear implantation, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting postoperative T levels.

Study design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Tertiary hospital.

Patients: We reviewed the charts of 124 ears of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation.

Interventions: We compared ECAP thresholds and T levels from different electrodes, calculated correlations between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and created five prediction models of T levels at switch-on and 6 months after surgery.

Main outcome measures: The accuracy of prediction in postoperative mapping current (T) levels.

Results: The ECAP thresholds of the slim modiolar electrodes were significantly lower than those of the straight electrodes on the apical side. However, there was no significant difference in the neural response telemetry thresholds between the two electrodes on the basal side. Lasso regression achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels at switch-on, and the random forest algorithm achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels 6 months after surgery in this dataset.

Conclusion: Machine learning techniques could be useful for accurately predicting postoperative T levels after cochlear implantation in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信