开发和实施循证生物场疗法标准化文档工具

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Paul Guillory , Tanecia Blue , John Casken , Courtnee Nunokawa
{"title":"开发和实施循证生物场疗法标准化文档工具","authors":"Paul Guillory ,&nbsp;Tanecia Blue ,&nbsp;John Casken ,&nbsp;Courtnee Nunokawa","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Biofield therapy (BT) is a complementary health practice involving the use of subtle energy to promote healing; however, monitoring the quality of care after implementing a BT program can be particularly challenging. The aim of this project was to strategically design, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based BT documentation tool to capture relevant data elements to display in a quality metric dashboard, while also being satisfactory to the practitioners who use it.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) method, key stakeholders at a government healthcare facility were gathered to design and use a structured documentation tool. After the tool's deployment, the stakeholders were routinely assessed over a three-month period to evaluate its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. At the end of the period a practitioner satisfaction questionnaire was deployed and a quality metric dashboard was launched.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven of the eleven BT-trained practitioners (64 %) used the template during the evaluation period and 255 sessions were documented. Forty-five percent of the staff responded to the Likert scored satisfaction questionnaire with 100 % indicating the template improved documentation, fit into the workflow, and facilitated interdisciplinary communication. The dashboard presented nine data elements, such as session indication and patient symptom scores, which can be filtered by date and location.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The satisfaction scores validated findings from the literature relative to structured documentation, quality review, and program evaluation. These outcomes support the expansion of BT into different clinical settings, foster future BT research endeavors, and allow for BT to be included in broader medical data analytic efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A structured documentation tool designed with findings from the evidence and input from key stakeholders can be an effective and satisfactory means of capturing quality metrics for evaluating the implementation of BT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and implementation of an evidence-based biofield therapy standardized documentation tool\",\"authors\":\"Paul Guillory ,&nbsp;Tanecia Blue ,&nbsp;John Casken ,&nbsp;Courtnee Nunokawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Biofield therapy (BT) is a complementary health practice involving the use of subtle energy to promote healing; however, monitoring the quality of care after implementing a BT program can be particularly challenging. The aim of this project was to strategically design, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based BT documentation tool to capture relevant data elements to display in a quality metric dashboard, while also being satisfactory to the practitioners who use it.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) method, key stakeholders at a government healthcare facility were gathered to design and use a structured documentation tool. After the tool's deployment, the stakeholders were routinely assessed over a three-month period to evaluate its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. At the end of the period a practitioner satisfaction questionnaire was deployed and a quality metric dashboard was launched.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven of the eleven BT-trained practitioners (64 %) used the template during the evaluation period and 255 sessions were documented. Forty-five percent of the staff responded to the Likert scored satisfaction questionnaire with 100 % indicating the template improved documentation, fit into the workflow, and facilitated interdisciplinary communication. The dashboard presented nine data elements, such as session indication and patient symptom scores, which can be filtered by date and location.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The satisfaction scores validated findings from the literature relative to structured documentation, quality review, and program evaluation. These outcomes support the expansion of BT into different clinical settings, foster future BT research endeavors, and allow for BT to be included in broader medical data analytic efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A structured documentation tool designed with findings from the evidence and input from key stakeholders can be an effective and satisfactory means of capturing quality metrics for evaluating the implementation of BT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:生物场疗法(BT)是一种利用微妙能量促进痊愈的辅助保健方法;然而,在实施生物场疗法项目后对护理质量进行监控却极具挑战性。本项目旨在战略性地设计、实施和评估一种循证 BT 记录工具,以捕捉相关数据元素,并将其显示在质量指标仪表板上,同时让使用该工具的从业人员感到满意。方法利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)方法,召集一家政府医疗机构的主要利益相关者设计和使用一种结构化记录工具。工具部署后,在三个月内对利益相关者进行例行评估,以评价其有效性并确定需要改进的地方。结果11 名接受过 BT 培训的从业人员中有 7 人(64%)在评估期间使用了该模板,并记录了 255 个疗程。45% 的员工对李克特满意度调查问卷做出了答复,100% 的人表示该模板改进了记录工作,符合工作流程,并促进了跨学科交流。满意度得分验证了文献中有关结构化文档、质量审查和项目评估的结论。这些结果支持将 BT 扩展到不同的临床环境中,促进未来的 BT 研究工作,并允许将 BT 纳入更广泛的医疗数据分析工作中。结论根据证据结论和主要利益相关者的意见设计的结构化文档工具,可以成为一种有效且令人满意的获取质量指标的手段,用于评估 BT 的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and implementation of an evidence-based biofield therapy standardized documentation tool

Introduction

Biofield therapy (BT) is a complementary health practice involving the use of subtle energy to promote healing; however, monitoring the quality of care after implementing a BT program can be particularly challenging. The aim of this project was to strategically design, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based BT documentation tool to capture relevant data elements to display in a quality metric dashboard, while also being satisfactory to the practitioners who use it.

Methods

Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) method, key stakeholders at a government healthcare facility were gathered to design and use a structured documentation tool. After the tool's deployment, the stakeholders were routinely assessed over a three-month period to evaluate its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. At the end of the period a practitioner satisfaction questionnaire was deployed and a quality metric dashboard was launched.

Results

Seven of the eleven BT-trained practitioners (64 %) used the template during the evaluation period and 255 sessions were documented. Forty-five percent of the staff responded to the Likert scored satisfaction questionnaire with 100 % indicating the template improved documentation, fit into the workflow, and facilitated interdisciplinary communication. The dashboard presented nine data elements, such as session indication and patient symptom scores, which can be filtered by date and location.

Discussion

The satisfaction scores validated findings from the literature relative to structured documentation, quality review, and program evaluation. These outcomes support the expansion of BT into different clinical settings, foster future BT research endeavors, and allow for BT to be included in broader medical data analytic efforts.

Conclusion

A structured documentation tool designed with findings from the evidence and input from key stakeholders can be an effective and satisfactory means of capturing quality metrics for evaluating the implementation of BT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信