评估脑瘫儿童和青少年肱三头肌皮褶的廉价卡尺的有效性和可靠性

Q3 Nursing
Anna Jesus , Mark Conaway , Jodi Darring , Amy Shadron , Valentina Intagliata , Rebecca J. Scharf , Richard Stevenson
{"title":"评估脑瘫儿童和青少年肱三头肌皮褶的廉价卡尺的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Anna Jesus ,&nbsp;Mark Conaway ,&nbsp;Jodi Darring ,&nbsp;Amy Shadron ,&nbsp;Valentina Intagliata ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Scharf ,&nbsp;Richard Stevenson","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><p>To test the validity and reliability of an inexpensive caliper against the gold standard caliper for the measure of triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>50 children with CP were recruited in an academic medical center clinic. Two providers measured TSF using both the Holtain and Slim Guide. The intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained. Duplicate measures were used to calculate the technical errors of measurement (TE) and the coefficient of variation (CV) between the same provider with different calipers and different providers with the same caliper.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The correlation between the TSF measured using the Holtain versus the Slim Guide was 0.982 by provider 1 and 0.992 by provider 2. Intraobserver TE was 1.20 mm and 0.84 mm and CV was 9.7% and 7.1% for provider 1 and 2, respectively. Combining measurements of both observers, the TE and CV between calipers were 1.03 and 8.5%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Slim Guide provides measurements that are reliable and valid. The error between calipers is similar to inter-rater error in published studies using the gold standard, and differences are unlikely to impact clinical management. With an affordable caliper, skinfold measurements can become more widely utilized, enhancing clinical care and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000366/pdfft?md5=214ec89333c0d5574cd43fbf7d5db037&pid=1-s2.0-S2667268524000366-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of an inexpensive caliper to assess triceps skinfolds in children and young adults with cerebral palsy\",\"authors\":\"Anna Jesus ,&nbsp;Mark Conaway ,&nbsp;Jodi Darring ,&nbsp;Amy Shadron ,&nbsp;Valentina Intagliata ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Scharf ,&nbsp;Richard Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><p>To test the validity and reliability of an inexpensive caliper against the gold standard caliper for the measure of triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>50 children with CP were recruited in an academic medical center clinic. Two providers measured TSF using both the Holtain and Slim Guide. The intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained. Duplicate measures were used to calculate the technical errors of measurement (TE) and the coefficient of variation (CV) between the same provider with different calipers and different providers with the same caliper.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The correlation between the TSF measured using the Holtain versus the Slim Guide was 0.982 by provider 1 and 0.992 by provider 2. Intraobserver TE was 1.20 mm and 0.84 mm and CV was 9.7% and 7.1% for provider 1 and 2, respectively. Combining measurements of both observers, the TE and CV between calipers were 1.03 and 8.5%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Slim Guide provides measurements that are reliable and valid. The error between calipers is similar to inter-rater error in published studies using the gold standard, and differences are unlikely to impact clinical management. With an affordable caliper, skinfold measurements can become more widely utilized, enhancing clinical care and research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000366/pdfft?md5=214ec89333c0d5574cd43fbf7d5db037&pid=1-s2.0-S2667268524000366-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景&amp; 目的测试一种廉价卡尺与金标准卡尺在测量脑性瘫痪(CP)儿童肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)方面的有效性和可靠性。两名医疗人员使用 Holtain 和 Slim Guide 测量 TSF。得出类内相关系数。重复测量用于计算同一医疗人员使用不同卡尺和不同医疗人员使用相同卡尺时的测量技术误差(TE)和变异系数(CV)。结果使用 Holtain 和 Slim Guide 测量的 TSF 之间的相关性为:医疗人员 1 为 0.982,医疗人员 2 为 0.992。观察者内 TE 分别为 1.20 毫米和 0.84 毫米,观察者 1 和观察者 2 的 CV 分别为 9.7% 和 7.1%。综合两位观察者的测量结果,卡尺之间的 TE 和 CV 分别为 1.03 和 8.5%。卡尺之间的误差与已发表的使用金标准的研究中观察者之间的误差相似,差异不太可能影响临床管理。有了价格适中的卡尺,皮褶测量可以得到更广泛的应用,从而提高临床护理和研究水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of an inexpensive caliper to assess triceps skinfolds in children and young adults with cerebral palsy

Background & aims

To test the validity and reliability of an inexpensive caliper against the gold standard caliper for the measure of triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

50 children with CP were recruited in an academic medical center clinic. Two providers measured TSF using both the Holtain and Slim Guide. The intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained. Duplicate measures were used to calculate the technical errors of measurement (TE) and the coefficient of variation (CV) between the same provider with different calipers and different providers with the same caliper.

Results

The correlation between the TSF measured using the Holtain versus the Slim Guide was 0.982 by provider 1 and 0.992 by provider 2. Intraobserver TE was 1.20 mm and 0.84 mm and CV was 9.7% and 7.1% for provider 1 and 2, respectively. Combining measurements of both observers, the TE and CV between calipers were 1.03 and 8.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

The Slim Guide provides measurements that are reliable and valid. The error between calipers is similar to inter-rater error in published studies using the gold standard, and differences are unlikely to impact clinical management. With an affordable caliper, skinfold measurements can become more widely utilized, enhancing clinical care and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信