评估在美容区使用牙槽屏蔽技术植入即刻加载的种植体(随机对照临床试验)

Mohamed Shehata, Adham Alashwah, Rania Ahmed, Ahmed Ahmed
{"title":"评估在美容区使用牙槽屏蔽技术植入即刻加载的种植体(随机对照临床试验)","authors":"Mohamed Shehata, Adham Alashwah, Rania Ahmed, Ahmed Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2023.192795.1351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Once teeth are extracted, the alveolar bone with the labial bone plate reduction occurs as a consequence of the absence of blood flow. The socket-shield technique )SST) was introduced to end these consequences. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare between the conventional approach and the SST perspectives; clinical and radiographical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 individuals were parted into 2 groups; the study group: The (SST) with immediate loading was applied 10 implants in the anterior maxilla. The control group: 10 implants were instantly placed using immediate implant placement (IIP) along with the immediate loading. For both groups, CBCT-scans were pre-operatively evaluated and 6 months period for evaluating the dimensional changes within the labial bone plates including both the vertical and horizontal bone loss (VBL, HBL), measuring of clinical attachment loss (CAL), the dental implant stability quotients (DISQs) and the pink esthetic scores (PES), RESULTS: The mean Dental Implant Stability (DISQ) was 77.92+2.44 and 75.14+2.34 in control and study groups respectively 6 months postoperatively, the average HBL bone level 6 months postoperative in Group 1 was 6.88+0.97mm, and in Group 2 was 6.74+0.93mm. While mean VBL level after 6 months of follow up in Groups 1 and 2 was 0.93+0.57mm, and 1.55+0.85mm respectively. The mean PES in Group 1 was 12.10+0.57 after 6 months, while in Group 2 was 7.80+1.14. The mean CAL 6 months Post-operatively in Group 1 and Group 2 was 0.90+0.57mm and 1.50+0.85mm respectively. There was high statistically significant difference between the study and control group. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of socket-shield was conserved the labial root part","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE LOADED IMPLANTS PLACED USING THE SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Shehata, Adham Alashwah, Rania Ahmed, Ahmed Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjalexu.2023.192795.1351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Once teeth are extracted, the alveolar bone with the labial bone plate reduction occurs as a consequence of the absence of blood flow. The socket-shield technique )SST) was introduced to end these consequences. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare between the conventional approach and the SST perspectives; clinical and radiographical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 individuals were parted into 2 groups; the study group: The (SST) with immediate loading was applied 10 implants in the anterior maxilla. The control group: 10 implants were instantly placed using immediate implant placement (IIP) along with the immediate loading. For both groups, CBCT-scans were pre-operatively evaluated and 6 months period for evaluating the dimensional changes within the labial bone plates including both the vertical and horizontal bone loss (VBL, HBL), measuring of clinical attachment loss (CAL), the dental implant stability quotients (DISQs) and the pink esthetic scores (PES), RESULTS: The mean Dental Implant Stability (DISQ) was 77.92+2.44 and 75.14+2.34 in control and study groups respectively 6 months postoperatively, the average HBL bone level 6 months postoperative in Group 1 was 6.88+0.97mm, and in Group 2 was 6.74+0.93mm. While mean VBL level after 6 months of follow up in Groups 1 and 2 was 0.93+0.57mm, and 1.55+0.85mm respectively. The mean PES in Group 1 was 12.10+0.57 after 6 months, while in Group 2 was 7.80+1.14. The mean CAL 6 months Post-operatively in Group 1 and Group 2 was 0.90+0.57mm and 1.50+0.85mm respectively. There was high statistically significant difference between the study and control group. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of socket-shield was conserved the labial root part\",\"PeriodicalId\":7723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.192795.1351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.192795.1351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:拔牙后,由于缺乏血流,牙槽骨和唇侧骨板会发生萎缩。为了消除这些后果,人们引入了窝沟封闭技术(SST)。目的:我们的目标是比较传统方法和 SST 的临床和影像学效果。材料和方法:20 名患者分成两组:研究组:研究组:在上颌骨前部植入 10 个种植体,采用即刻加载法(SST)。对照组对照组:使用即刻种植体植入法(IIP)和即刻加载法植入 10 个种植体。两组患者术前和术后 6 个月都要进行 CBCT 扫描,以评估唇侧骨板的尺寸变化,包括垂直和水平骨量损失(VBL、HBL)、临床附着力损失测量(CAL)、种植体稳定性商数(DISQ)和粉色美学评分(PES)。对照组和研究组术后 6 个月的平均 HBL 骨水平分别为 6.88+0.97mm 和 6.74+0.93mm。随访 6 个月后,第一组和第二组的平均 VBL 水平分别为 0.93+0.57 毫米和 1.55+0.85 毫米。第一组 6 个月后的平均 PES 为 12.10+0.57,第二组为 7.80+1.14。第一组和第二组术后 6 个月的平均 CAL 分别为 0.90+0.57mm 和 1.50+0.85mm。研究组与对照组在统计学上差异很大。结论:窝沟封闭技术保留了唇侧牙根部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE LOADED IMPLANTS PLACED USING THE SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)
INTRODUCTION: Once teeth are extracted, the alveolar bone with the labial bone plate reduction occurs as a consequence of the absence of blood flow. The socket-shield technique )SST) was introduced to end these consequences. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare between the conventional approach and the SST perspectives; clinical and radiographical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 individuals were parted into 2 groups; the study group: The (SST) with immediate loading was applied 10 implants in the anterior maxilla. The control group: 10 implants were instantly placed using immediate implant placement (IIP) along with the immediate loading. For both groups, CBCT-scans were pre-operatively evaluated and 6 months period for evaluating the dimensional changes within the labial bone plates including both the vertical and horizontal bone loss (VBL, HBL), measuring of clinical attachment loss (CAL), the dental implant stability quotients (DISQs) and the pink esthetic scores (PES), RESULTS: The mean Dental Implant Stability (DISQ) was 77.92+2.44 and 75.14+2.34 in control and study groups respectively 6 months postoperatively, the average HBL bone level 6 months postoperative in Group 1 was 6.88+0.97mm, and in Group 2 was 6.74+0.93mm. While mean VBL level after 6 months of follow up in Groups 1 and 2 was 0.93+0.57mm, and 1.55+0.85mm respectively. The mean PES in Group 1 was 12.10+0.57 after 6 months, while in Group 2 was 7.80+1.14. The mean CAL 6 months Post-operatively in Group 1 and Group 2 was 0.90+0.57mm and 1.50+0.85mm respectively. There was high statistically significant difference between the study and control group. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of socket-shield was conserved the labial root part
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信