通过玻璃体旁切除术二次植入眼内透镜后的玻璃体视网膜疗效

Gabriel T. Kaufmann, Omesh P Gupta, Julia Yu, Michael Nguyen, Crystal Y. Lee, Kathryn Achuck, Jason Hsu, Allen C. Ho, C. Regillo, Sunir J. Garg, M. Klufas, Sonia Mehta, David Xu, Michael N. Cohen, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Ajay E Kuriyan, M. Starr
{"title":"通过玻璃体旁切除术二次植入眼内透镜后的玻璃体视网膜疗效","authors":"Gabriel T. Kaufmann, Omesh P Gupta, Julia Yu, Michael Nguyen, Crystal Y. Lee, Kathryn Achuck, Jason Hsu, Allen C. Ho, C. Regillo, Sunir J. Garg, M. Klufas, Sonia Mehta, David Xu, Michael N. Cohen, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Ajay E Kuriyan, M. Starr","doi":"10.1097/iae.0000000000004139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015-December 2020.\n \n \n \n Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) vs scleral sutured IOL (SSIOL) vs scleral fixated IOL (SFIOL) vs sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery.\n \n \n \n The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0-2.7%). Rates of postoperative RRD were not significantly different between techniques [ACIOL 9/198 (4.5%), SFIOL 1/54 (1.9%), SSIOL 14/274 (5.1%), sulcus 2/35 (5.7%), total 26/561 (4.6%), p=0.79]. Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses [ACIOL 5/198 (2.5%), SFIOL 4/54 (7.4%), SSIOL 16/274 (5.8%), sulcus 5/35 (14.3%), total 30/561 (5.3%), p=0.12].\n \n \n \n Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear were not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.\n","PeriodicalId":21178,"journal":{"name":"Retina","volume":"148 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitreoretinal Outcomes Following Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation with Pars Plana Vitrectomy\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel T. Kaufmann, Omesh P Gupta, Julia Yu, Michael Nguyen, Crystal Y. Lee, Kathryn Achuck, Jason Hsu, Allen C. Ho, C. Regillo, Sunir J. Garg, M. Klufas, Sonia Mehta, David Xu, Michael N. Cohen, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Ajay E Kuriyan, M. Starr\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/iae.0000000000004139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015-December 2020.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) vs scleral sutured IOL (SSIOL) vs scleral fixated IOL (SFIOL) vs sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0-2.7%). Rates of postoperative RRD were not significantly different between techniques [ACIOL 9/198 (4.5%), SFIOL 1/54 (1.9%), SSIOL 14/274 (5.1%), sulcus 2/35 (5.7%), total 26/561 (4.6%), p=0.79]. Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses [ACIOL 5/198 (2.5%), SFIOL 4/54 (7.4%), SSIOL 16/274 (5.8%), sulcus 5/35 (14.3%), total 30/561 (5.3%), p=0.12].\\n \\n \\n \\n Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear were not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对 2015 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一家机构接受玻璃体视网膜外科医生二次眼内人工晶体 (IOL) 植入术的 561 名成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。 研究评估了患者的历史因素、术中/术后并发症以及人工晶体类型(前房人工晶体(ACIOL) vs 巩膜缝合人工晶体(SSIOL) vs 巩膜固定人工晶体(SFIOL) vs 沟)的结果。主要结果是术后视网膜撕裂率和流变性视网膜脱离率(RRD)。次要结果是术中内激光、术中视网膜撕裂和进一步人工晶体手术的发生率。 术中视网膜撕裂的发生率为7.3%,不同技术间无显著差异。在所有技术中,术中使用内激光的比率为17.5%,不同技术之间无明显差异。术后视网膜撕裂率较低(0-2.7%)。不同技术的术后视网膜脱落率无明显差异[ACIOL 9/198 (4.5%),SFIOL 1/54 (1.9%),SSIOL 14/274 (5.1%),Sulcus 2/35 (5.7%),总计 26/561 (4.6%),P=0.79]。沟状人工晶体的重复手术率呈上升趋势[ACIOL 5/198 (2.5%),SFIOL 4/54 (7.4%),SSIOL 16/274 (5.8%),沟状 5/35 (14.3%),总计 30/561 (5.3%),P=0.12]。 在二次人工晶体手术中,术中使用内激光和术中视网膜撕裂的情况并不少见,这凸显了对这些患者进行仔细的玻璃体视网膜管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vitreoretinal Outcomes Following Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation with Pars Plana Vitrectomy
Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015-December 2020. Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) vs scleral sutured IOL (SSIOL) vs scleral fixated IOL (SFIOL) vs sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery. The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0-2.7%). Rates of postoperative RRD were not significantly different between techniques [ACIOL 9/198 (4.5%), SFIOL 1/54 (1.9%), SSIOL 14/274 (5.1%), sulcus 2/35 (5.7%), total 26/561 (4.6%), p=0.79]. Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses [ACIOL 5/198 (2.5%), SFIOL 4/54 (7.4%), SSIOL 16/274 (5.8%), sulcus 5/35 (14.3%), total 30/561 (5.3%), p=0.12]. Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear were not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信