{"title":"大 M 游戏","authors":"Kjetil Haugen, Knut P. Heen","doi":"10.32388/mh59xw","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses \"extreme\" Prisoner's Dilemma games, and questions Nash equilibrium as a solution concept in such situations. A slight reformulation of the concept is suggested, securing that a more reasonable solution is chosen.\n\nA SMALL WARNING TO THE READER: This article is special, not everything is true. That is, there are fictional parts. The reader is left for deciding what is fictional and what is science. Perhaps we could categorize the paper as a quiz where the objective is to rule out fictional parts from the content which at least is meant to be scientific.\n","PeriodicalId":500839,"journal":{"name":"Qeios","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Big M Game\",\"authors\":\"Kjetil Haugen, Knut P. Heen\",\"doi\":\"10.32388/mh59xw\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses \\\"extreme\\\" Prisoner's Dilemma games, and questions Nash equilibrium as a solution concept in such situations. A slight reformulation of the concept is suggested, securing that a more reasonable solution is chosen.\\n\\nA SMALL WARNING TO THE READER: This article is special, not everything is true. That is, there are fictional parts. The reader is left for deciding what is fictional and what is science. Perhaps we could categorize the paper as a quiz where the objective is to rule out fictional parts from the content which at least is meant to be scientific.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":500839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qeios\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qeios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32388/mh59xw\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qeios","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/mh59xw","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses "extreme" Prisoner's Dilemma games, and questions Nash equilibrium as a solution concept in such situations. A slight reformulation of the concept is suggested, securing that a more reasonable solution is chosen.
A SMALL WARNING TO THE READER: This article is special, not everything is true. That is, there are fictional parts. The reader is left for deciding what is fictional and what is science. Perhaps we could categorize the paper as a quiz where the objective is to rule out fictional parts from the content which at least is meant to be scientific.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
