C.I. 刘易斯的理想主义、现实主义和个人主义暗示

Charles S. Herrman
{"title":"C.I. 刘易斯的理想主义、现实主义和个人主义暗示","authors":"Charles S. Herrman","doi":"10.19195/1895-8001.18.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis paper examines the arguments of C.I. Lewis respecting the utility of idealist and realist philosophical categories and ends with a look at his personalist credentials. It is reported that Lewis pared away the outer layer of idealism leaving its utility in explaining perception via his concept of the “given”. This resulted in a fundamentally realist vision with the exception of perceptive theory. It is offered that the realist perspective is the more satisfactory metaphysical component of a healthy personalist philosophy, one that Lewis would presumably favor. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":489609,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia","volume":"98 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idealism, Realism and Hints of Personalism in C.I. Lewis\",\"authors\":\"Charles S. Herrman\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/1895-8001.18.3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThis paper examines the arguments of C.I. Lewis respecting the utility of idealist and realist philosophical categories and ends with a look at his personalist credentials. It is reported that Lewis pared away the outer layer of idealism leaving its utility in explaining perception via his concept of the “given”. This resulted in a fundamentally realist vision with the exception of perceptive theory. It is offered that the realist perspective is the more satisfactory metaphysical component of a healthy personalist philosophy, one that Lewis would presumably favor. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":489609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia\",\"volume\":\"98 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.18.3.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.18.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了 C.I. 刘易斯关于唯心主义和现实主义哲学范畴的效用的论点,最后对他的个人主义资质进行了审视。据报道,刘易斯通过他的 "给定 "概念剔除了唯心主义的外层,留下了唯心主义在解释知觉方面的效用。这就形成了除感知理论之外的基本现实主义观点。有人提出,现实主义观点是健康的个人主义哲学中更令人满意的形而上学组成部分,而刘易斯大概也会赞成这种观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Idealism, Realism and Hints of Personalism in C.I. Lewis
This paper examines the arguments of C.I. Lewis respecting the utility of idealist and realist philosophical categories and ends with a look at his personalist credentials. It is reported that Lewis pared away the outer layer of idealism leaving its utility in explaining perception via his concept of the “given”. This resulted in a fundamentally realist vision with the exception of perceptive theory. It is offered that the realist perspective is the more satisfactory metaphysical component of a healthy personalist philosophy, one that Lewis would presumably favor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信