在有争议海域的单方面活动和有意义的回应

Xiangjin Luo
{"title":"在有争议海域的单方面活动和有意义的回应","authors":"Xiangjin Luo","doi":"10.22158/elp.v7n1p42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unilateral activities conducted in a disputed maritime area pending maritime delimitation are considered to be a violation of the pre-delimitation obligations imposed by Article 74/83(3) of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which may trigger State responsibility. The obligations contained are negotiation in good faith and self-restraint. However, this is not a prohibition of all activities in disputed maritime areas. Through a study of the relevant case law of the international courts and tribunals, this article finds leniency towards unilateral activities in disputed maritime areas, i.e., some exceptions are permitted. In the South China Sea, reaching a final delimitation agreement can be a difficult and long-term task due to competing interests and the numerous countries involved. Facing unilateral activities undertaken in such an area, the appropriate and meaningful responses are significant to safeguard maritime rights and interests.","PeriodicalId":515569,"journal":{"name":"Economics, Law and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Activities in Disputed Maritime Areas and Meaningful Responses\",\"authors\":\"Xiangjin Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/elp.v7n1p42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unilateral activities conducted in a disputed maritime area pending maritime delimitation are considered to be a violation of the pre-delimitation obligations imposed by Article 74/83(3) of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which may trigger State responsibility. The obligations contained are negotiation in good faith and self-restraint. However, this is not a prohibition of all activities in disputed maritime areas. Through a study of the relevant case law of the international courts and tribunals, this article finds leniency towards unilateral activities in disputed maritime areas, i.e., some exceptions are permitted. In the South China Sea, reaching a final delimitation agreement can be a difficult and long-term task due to competing interests and the numerous countries involved. Facing unilateral activities undertaken in such an area, the appropriate and meaningful responses are significant to safeguard maritime rights and interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics, Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics, Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v7n1p42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics, Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v7n1p42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在海洋划界之前,在有争议海域进行的单方面活动被视为违反 1982 年《联合国海洋法公约》第 74/83(3)条规定的划界前义务,可能引发国家责任。所包含的义务是真诚谈判和自我克制。然而,这并不是禁止在有争议海域的所有活动。通过对国际法院和法庭相关判例法的研究,本文发现了对有争议海域单方面活动的宽松态度,即允许一些例外情况。在南海,由于利益冲突和涉及国家众多,达成最终划界协议可能是一项艰巨而长期的任务。面对在此类海域开展的单方面活动,适当而有意义的应对措施对于维护海洋权益意义重大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral Activities in Disputed Maritime Areas and Meaningful Responses
Unilateral activities conducted in a disputed maritime area pending maritime delimitation are considered to be a violation of the pre-delimitation obligations imposed by Article 74/83(3) of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which may trigger State responsibility. The obligations contained are negotiation in good faith and self-restraint. However, this is not a prohibition of all activities in disputed maritime areas. Through a study of the relevant case law of the international courts and tribunals, this article finds leniency towards unilateral activities in disputed maritime areas, i.e., some exceptions are permitted. In the South China Sea, reaching a final delimitation agreement can be a difficult and long-term task due to competing interests and the numerous countries involved. Facing unilateral activities undertaken in such an area, the appropriate and meaningful responses are significant to safeguard maritime rights and interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信