COVID-19 期间中医师对远程医疗服务的提供和看法:中国香港横断面研究》。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2023.0635
David C N Wong, Yushan Wu, Hong Fung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Ho-Man Shum, William Y H Cheung, Yi Chung Cheung, Chun Pong Lam, Vincent C H Chung
{"title":"COVID-19 期间中医师对远程医疗服务的提供和看法:中国香港横断面研究》。","authors":"David C N Wong, Yushan Wu, Hong Fung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Ho-Man Shum, William Y H Cheung, Yi Chung Cheung, Chun Pong Lam, Vincent C H Chung","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2023.0635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Telemedicine has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among other health care professionals, Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) face practical challenges in providing telemedicine consultations. This study aims to explore CMPs' experience and perceptions of telemedicine service provision before and during the pandemic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A territory-wide cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Hong Kong between April and May 2022. A structured questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to investigate the provision of and perception on telemedicine service, as well as usability of telemedicine among CMPs. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 195 CMPs participated the survey. Before COVID-19, 42% (81/195) had been providing telemedicine services, and the proportion doubled during COVID-19. CMPs in the private sector are the main providers. Mobile apps including WhatsApp, WeChat, and Zoom were commonly used for consultations (75%, 120/161). Barriers in providing telemedicine included inability of conducting physical examination on patients (69%, 134/195), legal and ethical concerns over medical negligence (61%, 118/195), and patients' incompetence on e-literacy (50%, 98/195). Respondents urged professional and regulatory bodies to provide an explicit clinical guideline that demonstrate best practice in traditional Chinese medicine telemedicine, and to clarify legal and ethical implications of such practice. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> CMPs demonstrated their competency in telemedicine, and most of them provided telemedicine during COVID-19. Development of appropriate guidelines on the provision of telemedicine would support CMPs to continue provision after the pandemic, whereas a user-friendly and comprehensive telemedicine e-platform would enhance quality of such service. Facilitating patients with lower e-literacy to access telemedicine is key to reduce disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Provision and Perceptions of Telemedicine Services Among Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong, China.\",\"authors\":\"David C N Wong, Yushan Wu, Hong Fung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Ho-Man Shum, William Y H Cheung, Yi Chung Cheung, Chun Pong Lam, Vincent C H Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2023.0635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Telemedicine has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among other health care professionals, Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) face practical challenges in providing telemedicine consultations. This study aims to explore CMPs' experience and perceptions of telemedicine service provision before and during the pandemic. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A territory-wide cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Hong Kong between April and May 2022. A structured questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to investigate the provision of and perception on telemedicine service, as well as usability of telemedicine among CMPs. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 195 CMPs participated the survey. Before COVID-19, 42% (81/195) had been providing telemedicine services, and the proportion doubled during COVID-19. CMPs in the private sector are the main providers. Mobile apps including WhatsApp, WeChat, and Zoom were commonly used for consultations (75%, 120/161). Barriers in providing telemedicine included inability of conducting physical examination on patients (69%, 134/195), legal and ethical concerns over medical negligence (61%, 118/195), and patients' incompetence on e-literacy (50%, 98/195). Respondents urged professional and regulatory bodies to provide an explicit clinical guideline that demonstrate best practice in traditional Chinese medicine telemedicine, and to clarify legal and ethical implications of such practice. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> CMPs demonstrated their competency in telemedicine, and most of them provided telemedicine during COVID-19. Development of appropriate guidelines on the provision of telemedicine would support CMPs to continue provision after the pandemic, whereas a user-friendly and comprehensive telemedicine e-platform would enhance quality of such service. Facilitating patients with lower e-literacy to access telemedicine is key to reduce disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2023.0635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗得到了广泛应用。在其他医护人员中,中医在提供远程医疗咨询时面临实际挑战。本研究旨在探讨中医师在大流行之前和期间提供远程医疗服务的经验和看法。研究方法我们于 2022 年 4 月至 5 月期间在香港进行了一项全港性横断面在线调查。调查采用开放式问题的结构化问卷,以了解中醫对远程医疗服务的提供和看法,以及远程医疗的可用性。结果:共有 195 名中医师参与了调查。在 COVID-19 之前,42%(81/195)的中医已提供远程医疗服务,而在 COVID-19 期间,这一比例翻了一番。私营部门的中医是主要提供者。包括 WhatsApp、微信和 Zoom 在内的移动应用程序通常用于会诊(75%,120/161)。提供远程医疗的障碍包括无法对患者进行身体检查(69%,134/195)、对医疗过失的法律和道德担忧(61%,118/195)以及患者不具备电子素养(50%,98/195)。受访者敦促专业和监管机构提供明确的临床指南,展示中医远程医疗的最佳实践,并澄清这种做法的法律和伦理影响。结论中醫師展示了他們在遠程醫療方面的能力,他們大多數在 COVID-19 期間提供了遠程醫療服務。制定适当的远程医疗指南将有助于中医生在大流行后继续提供远程医疗服务,而方便用户使用的综合远程医疗电子平台将提高此类服务的质量。为电子文化水平较低的患者提供便利,使其能够获得远程医疗服务,是缩小差距的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Provision and Perceptions of Telemedicine Services Among Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong, China.

Objectives: Telemedicine has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among other health care professionals, Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) face practical challenges in providing telemedicine consultations. This study aims to explore CMPs' experience and perceptions of telemedicine service provision before and during the pandemic. Methods: A territory-wide cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Hong Kong between April and May 2022. A structured questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to investigate the provision of and perception on telemedicine service, as well as usability of telemedicine among CMPs. Results: A total of 195 CMPs participated the survey. Before COVID-19, 42% (81/195) had been providing telemedicine services, and the proportion doubled during COVID-19. CMPs in the private sector are the main providers. Mobile apps including WhatsApp, WeChat, and Zoom were commonly used for consultations (75%, 120/161). Barriers in providing telemedicine included inability of conducting physical examination on patients (69%, 134/195), legal and ethical concerns over medical negligence (61%, 118/195), and patients' incompetence on e-literacy (50%, 98/195). Respondents urged professional and regulatory bodies to provide an explicit clinical guideline that demonstrate best practice in traditional Chinese medicine telemedicine, and to clarify legal and ethical implications of such practice. Conclusions: CMPs demonstrated their competency in telemedicine, and most of them provided telemedicine during COVID-19. Development of appropriate guidelines on the provision of telemedicine would support CMPs to continue provision after the pandemic, whereas a user-friendly and comprehensive telemedicine e-platform would enhance quality of such service. Facilitating patients with lower e-literacy to access telemedicine is key to reduce disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信