应用下肢环形框架固定术后,患者是否能立即实现 "完全负重"?

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Andy Craig, Elizabeth Barron, Hemant Sharma, Elizabeth Moulder
{"title":"应用下肢环形框架固定术后,患者是否能立即实现 \"完全负重\"?","authors":"Andy Craig, Elizabeth Barron, Hemant Sharma, Elizabeth Moulder","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The decision to use circular frame fixation for lower limb trauma, or elective deformity correction, often accompanies the assertion that the patient will be able to fully weight-bear through the limb immediately following surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>About 53 patients underwent retrospective review. Included in the study were current attendees of adult specialist physiotherapy, following circular frame application to the lower leg at our Institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Cases with incomplete data, cases given postoperative status of non-weight-bearing, those with physiotherapy follow-up conducted elsewhere, or cases of polytrauma were excluded from the study.Weight-bearing assessment and rehabilitation supervision were at the discretion of the physiotherapy team. The clinical concept of 'full weight-bearing' is poorly defined, but was documented in the context of displaying a stable gait using elbow crutches and subsequently without walking aids. Comparative data was analysed using an unpaired, two-tailed Welch's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean postoperative time to full weight-bearing using crutches was 28.3 days (0-159) (<i>n</i> = 40).Mean postoperative time to independent full weight-bearing with no walking aids was 230.6 days (35-393), or 7.1 months (0-12) (<i>n</i>= 34).No significant differences were seen between:Frames for open injuries (<i>n</i>= 5) vs closed injuries (<i>n</i> = 17; <i>p</i> > 0.4).Joint-spanning constructs (<i>n</i>= 18) vs non-spanning constructs (<i>n</i> = 21; <i>p</i> > 0.6), orTreatment of intra-articular injuries (<i>n</i> = 14) vs extra-articular injuries (<i>n</i> = 17; <i>p</i> > 0.2).Interpretation of these results should be made with caution due to sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to permit patients to fully weight-bear immediately after surgery is often a distinct advantage of the circular frame over other fixation modalities, for a variety of indications. However, it does not follow that patients are capable of doing so; there is a long dependency on walking aids. This would appear to be the case irrespective of open/closed injuries, intra-/extra-articular injuries, or the use of a spanning construct across the knee or ankle.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Craig A, Barron E, Sharma H, <i>et al</i>. Do Patients Achieve \"Full Weight-bearing\" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):40-44.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"19 1","pages":"40-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Patients Achieve \\\"Full Weight-bearing\\\" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb?\",\"authors\":\"Andy Craig, Elizabeth Barron, Hemant Sharma, Elizabeth Moulder\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The decision to use circular frame fixation for lower limb trauma, or elective deformity correction, often accompanies the assertion that the patient will be able to fully weight-bear through the limb immediately following surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>About 53 patients underwent retrospective review. Included in the study were current attendees of adult specialist physiotherapy, following circular frame application to the lower leg at our Institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Cases with incomplete data, cases given postoperative status of non-weight-bearing, those with physiotherapy follow-up conducted elsewhere, or cases of polytrauma were excluded from the study.Weight-bearing assessment and rehabilitation supervision were at the discretion of the physiotherapy team. The clinical concept of 'full weight-bearing' is poorly defined, but was documented in the context of displaying a stable gait using elbow crutches and subsequently without walking aids. Comparative data was analysed using an unpaired, two-tailed Welch's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean postoperative time to full weight-bearing using crutches was 28.3 days (0-159) (<i>n</i> = 40).Mean postoperative time to independent full weight-bearing with no walking aids was 230.6 days (35-393), or 7.1 months (0-12) (<i>n</i>= 34).No significant differences were seen between:Frames for open injuries (<i>n</i>= 5) vs closed injuries (<i>n</i> = 17; <i>p</i> > 0.4).Joint-spanning constructs (<i>n</i>= 18) vs non-spanning constructs (<i>n</i> = 21; <i>p</i> > 0.6), orTreatment of intra-articular injuries (<i>n</i> = 14) vs extra-articular injuries (<i>n</i> = 17; <i>p</i> > 0.2).Interpretation of these results should be made with caution due to sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to permit patients to fully weight-bear immediately after surgery is often a distinct advantage of the circular frame over other fixation modalities, for a variety of indications. However, it does not follow that patients are capable of doing so; there is a long dependency on walking aids. This would appear to be the case irrespective of open/closed injuries, intra-/extra-articular injuries, or the use of a spanning construct across the knee or ankle.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Craig A, Barron E, Sharma H, <i>et al</i>. Do Patients Achieve \\\"Full Weight-bearing\\\" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):40-44.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"40-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在决定对下肢创伤或选择性畸形矫正采用环形框架固定时,通常会断言患者在术后能够立即通过肢体完全负重:约 53 名患者接受了回顾性检查。研究对象包括 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在我院接受小腿环形矫形架治疗的成人专科物理治疗师。研究排除了数据不完整的病例、术后无负重状态的病例、在其他地方进行物理治疗随访的病例或多发性创伤病例。完全负重 "的临床概念定义不清,但在使用肘部拐杖显示稳定步态以及随后不使用助行器的情况下均有记录。比较数据采用非配对、双尾韦尔奇 t 检验进行分析:术后使用拐杖完全负重的平均时间为28.3天(0-159)(n=40).术后不使用助行器独立完全负重的平均时间为230.6天(35-393),或7.1个月(0-12)(n=34).开放性损伤(n=5)与闭合性损伤(n=17;P>0.4)的框架之间无显著差异。4).关节跨度结构(n= 18)vs 非跨度结构(n= 21;p > 0.6),或关节内损伤治疗(n= 14)vs 关节外损伤治疗(n= 17;p > 0.2):结论:就各种适应症而言,圆形骨架与其他固定方式相比,能够让患者在术后立即完全负重,这往往是圆形骨架的一个明显优势。然而,这并不意味着患者能够做到这一点;患者需要长期依赖助行器。这种情况似乎与开放性/闭合性损伤、关节内/外损伤或跨膝关节或踝关节的横跨结构的使用无关:Craig A, Barron E, Sharma H, et al.下肢环形框架固定术后患者能立即实现 "完全负重 "吗?Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):40-44.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Patients Achieve "Full Weight-bearing" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb?

Introduction: The decision to use circular frame fixation for lower limb trauma, or elective deformity correction, often accompanies the assertion that the patient will be able to fully weight-bear through the limb immediately following surgery.

Materials and methods: About 53 patients underwent retrospective review. Included in the study were current attendees of adult specialist physiotherapy, following circular frame application to the lower leg at our Institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Cases with incomplete data, cases given postoperative status of non-weight-bearing, those with physiotherapy follow-up conducted elsewhere, or cases of polytrauma were excluded from the study.Weight-bearing assessment and rehabilitation supervision were at the discretion of the physiotherapy team. The clinical concept of 'full weight-bearing' is poorly defined, but was documented in the context of displaying a stable gait using elbow crutches and subsequently without walking aids. Comparative data was analysed using an unpaired, two-tailed Welch's t-test.

Results: Mean postoperative time to full weight-bearing using crutches was 28.3 days (0-159) (n = 40).Mean postoperative time to independent full weight-bearing with no walking aids was 230.6 days (35-393), or 7.1 months (0-12) (n= 34).No significant differences were seen between:Frames for open injuries (n= 5) vs closed injuries (n = 17; p > 0.4).Joint-spanning constructs (n= 18) vs non-spanning constructs (n = 21; p > 0.6), orTreatment of intra-articular injuries (n = 14) vs extra-articular injuries (n = 17; p > 0.2).Interpretation of these results should be made with caution due to sample size.

Conclusion: The ability to permit patients to fully weight-bear immediately after surgery is often a distinct advantage of the circular frame over other fixation modalities, for a variety of indications. However, it does not follow that patients are capable of doing so; there is a long dependency on walking aids. This would appear to be the case irrespective of open/closed injuries, intra-/extra-articular injuries, or the use of a spanning construct across the knee or ankle.

How to cite this article: Craig A, Barron E, Sharma H, et al. Do Patients Achieve "Full Weight-bearing" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):40-44.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信