Selaginellaceae 的分类和对 "对'(2943)保护 Selaginella，nom. cons.，(Selaginellaceae)保守类型的建议'的反驳：一个毫无根据的破坏性想法"

IF 3 2区生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY

Taxon Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1002/tax.13179

Xin‐Mao Zhou, Li‐Bing Zhang

{"title":"Selaginellaceae 的分类和对 \"对'(2943)保护 Selaginella，nom. cons.，(Selaginellaceae)保守类型的建议'的反驳：一个毫无根据的破坏性想法\"","authors":"Xin‐Mao Zhou, Li‐Bing Zhang","doi":"10.1002/tax.13179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proposal by Wan & al. intended to maintain maximal nomenclatural stability by proposing to conserve Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type, regardless of how and when Selaginella is to be split into several or more genera, as has already been done in some recent studies. Valdespino & al. do not seem to have understood the nomenclatural benefit of the Wan & al. proposal and mix up this proposal with the classification by Zhou & Zhang. In addition, their rebuttal paper appears to contain a number of issues. We respectably urge the Nomenclature Committee and the botanical community to reject their rebuttal and make a decision that will benefit long‐term nomenclatural stability in Selaginellaceae.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Selaginellaceae and responses to “Rebuttal to ‘(2943) Proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type’: An unwarranted and disruptive idea”\",\"authors\":\"Xin‐Mao Zhou, Li‐Bing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tax.13179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proposal by Wan & al. intended to maintain maximal nomenclatural stability by proposing to conserve Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type, regardless of how and when Selaginella is to be split into several or more genera, as has already been done in some recent studies. Valdespino & al. do not seem to have understood the nomenclatural benefit of the Wan & al. proposal and mix up this proposal with the classification by Zhou & Zhang. In addition, their rebuttal paper appears to contain a number of issues. We respectably urge the Nomenclature Committee and the botanical community to reject their rebuttal and make a decision that will benefit long‐term nomenclatural stability in Selaginellaceae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxon\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13179\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Wan & al.的建议旨在通过保留 Selaginella（Selaginellaceae）的类型来保持命名的最大稳定性，无论 Selaginella 如何以及何时被分成几个或更多属，最近的一些研究已经这样做了。Valdespino & al.似乎并不理解 Wan & al.建议在命名上的好处，并将该建议与 Zhou & Zhang 的分类混为一谈。此外，他们的反驳论文似乎还存在一些问题。我们恳请命名委员会和植物学界拒绝他们的反驳，做出有利于 Selaginellaceae 长期命名稳定性的决定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Classification of Selaginellaceae and responses to “Rebuttal to ‘(2943) Proposal to conserve Selaginella, nom. cons., (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type’: An unwarranted and disruptive idea”

The proposal by Wan & al. intended to maintain maximal nomenclatural stability by proposing to conserve Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) with a conserved type, regardless of how and when Selaginella is to be split into several or more genera, as has already been done in some recent studies. Valdespino & al. do not seem to have understood the nomenclatural benefit of the Wan & al. proposal and mix up this proposal with the classification by Zhou & Zhang. In addition, their rebuttal paper appears to contain a number of issues. We respectably urge the Nomenclature Committee and the botanical community to reject their rebuttal and make a decision that will benefit long‐term nomenclatural stability in Selaginellaceae.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Taxon 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

8.80%

发文量

177

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.