提高司法公正和效率:倡导地方和联邦执法机构采用认知访谈技术

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Shane McNeil
{"title":"提高司法公正和效率:倡导地方和联邦执法机构采用认知访谈技术","authors":"Shane McNeil","doi":"10.1007/s11896-024-09682-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the disparities in adopting cognitive interviewing techniques between local and federal law enforcement agencies in the USA. Despite the established benefits of these techniques for enhancing witness recall accuracy and reducing false confessions, adoption at the local level lags significantly behind federal practices. Through a qualitative synthesis of existing literature and public reports, this study identifies the main barriers to adoption, which include resource limitations, training deficiencies, and cultural resistance within local agencies. The analysis suggests that comprehensive training programs, legislative mandates, and cultural shifts within law enforcement are critical to overcoming these barriers. Recommendations for promoting broader adoption include enhancing resource allocation for training, implementing national standards for investigative practices, and leveraging successful models from federal agencies. The paper underscores the need for a unified approach to improve investigative outcomes and justice across all levels of law enforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Justice and Efficiency: Advocating for the Adoption of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques Across Local and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies\",\"authors\":\"Shane McNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11896-024-09682-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates the disparities in adopting cognitive interviewing techniques between local and federal law enforcement agencies in the USA. Despite the established benefits of these techniques for enhancing witness recall accuracy and reducing false confessions, adoption at the local level lags significantly behind federal practices. Through a qualitative synthesis of existing literature and public reports, this study identifies the main barriers to adoption, which include resource limitations, training deficiencies, and cultural resistance within local agencies. The analysis suggests that comprehensive training programs, legislative mandates, and cultural shifts within law enforcement are critical to overcoming these barriers. Recommendations for promoting broader adoption include enhancing resource allocation for training, implementing national standards for investigative practices, and leveraging successful models from federal agencies. The paper underscores the need for a unified approach to improve investigative outcomes and justice across all levels of law enforcement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09682-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09682-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文调查了美国地方和联邦执法机构在采用认知询问技术方面的差异。尽管这些技术在提高证人回忆的准确性和减少虚假供词方面具有公认的优势,但在地方一级的采用却大大落后于联邦的做法。通过对现有文献和公开报告的定性综合,本研究确定了采用这些技术的主要障碍,其中包括资源限制、培训不足以及地方机构内部的文化阻力。分析表明,综合培训计划、立法授权以及执法部门内部的文化转变对于克服这些障碍至关重要。促进更广泛采用的建议包括加强培训资源分配、实施调查实践国家标准以及利用联邦机构的成功模式。本文强调,有必要采取统一的方法来改善各级执法部门的调查成果和司法公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Justice and Efficiency: Advocating for the Adoption of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques Across Local and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

This paper investigates the disparities in adopting cognitive interviewing techniques between local and federal law enforcement agencies in the USA. Despite the established benefits of these techniques for enhancing witness recall accuracy and reducing false confessions, adoption at the local level lags significantly behind federal practices. Through a qualitative synthesis of existing literature and public reports, this study identifies the main barriers to adoption, which include resource limitations, training deficiencies, and cultural resistance within local agencies. The analysis suggests that comprehensive training programs, legislative mandates, and cultural shifts within law enforcement are critical to overcoming these barriers. Recommendations for promoting broader adoption include enhancing resource allocation for training, implementing national standards for investigative practices, and leveraging successful models from federal agencies. The paper underscores the need for a unified approach to improve investigative outcomes and justice across all levels of law enforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal that reports research findings regarding the theory, practice and application of psychological issues in the criminal justice context, namely law enforcement, courts, and corrections. The Journal encourages submissions focusing on Police Psychology including personnel assessment, therapeutic methods, training, ethics and effective organizational operation. The Journal also welcomes articles that focus on criminal behavior and the application of psychology to effective correctional practices and facilitating recovery among victims of crime. Consumers of and contributors to this body of research include psychologists, criminologists, sociologists, legal experts, social workers, and other professionals representing various facets of the criminal justice system, both domestic and international.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信