{"title":"2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 1 月","authors":"Frank Cranmer","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probably the biggest legal news of the period under consideration was the judgment of the Supreme Court in <jats:italic>R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department</jats:italic> [2023] UKSC 42, [2023] WLR 4433, in which it held unanimously that the Government's policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. One critical issue was that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a right under the ECHR – and the Secretary of State is a public authority for that purpose.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"October 2023 to January 2024\",\"authors\":\"Frank Cranmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956618x24000048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Probably the biggest legal news of the period under consideration was the judgment of the Supreme Court in <jats:italic>R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department</jats:italic> [2023] UKSC 42, [2023] WLR 4433, in which it held unanimously that the Government's policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. One critical issue was that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a right under the ECHR – and the Secretary of State is a public authority for that purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x24000048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x24000048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本报告所述期间最大的法律新闻可能是最高法院对 R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, [2023] WLR 4433 一案的判决，在该案中，最高法院一致认为政府将寻求庇护者送往卢旺达的政策是非法的。其中一个关键问题是，根据 1998 年《人权法》第 6 条，公共当局的行为若不符合《欧洲人权公约》规定的权利，即属违法--而国务大臣就是公共当局。
Probably the biggest legal news of the period under consideration was the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, [2023] WLR 4433, in which it held unanimously that the Government's policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. One critical issue was that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a right under the ECHR – and the Secretary of State is a public authority for that purpose.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
