检察官办公室利用全球森林观察监测和阻止在塞拉多地区砍伐森林的经验

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Claudio Angelo Correa Gonzaga, José Guilherme Roquette, Fabio Angeoletto, Vinicius De Freitas Silgueiro, Luis Otávio Bau Macedo, Ana Paula Valdiones, Normandes Matos da Silva
{"title":"检察官办公室利用全球森林观察监测和阻止在塞拉多地区砍伐森林的经验","authors":"Claudio Angelo Correa Gonzaga, José Guilherme Roquette, Fabio Angeoletto, Vinicius De Freitas Silgueiro, Luis Otávio Bau Macedo, Ana Paula Valdiones, Normandes Matos da Silva","doi":"10.1017/s0376892924000110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The Cerrado biome is a global biodiversity hotspot, and more than half of its area has been devastated in recent decades. Nevertheless, environmental enforcement agencies have a low capacity for monitoring and curbing illegal deforestation and fires. In this context, the local unit of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Itiquira, Mato Grosso, has been experimenting since mid-2018 with the Global Forest Watch platform to detect illegal deforestation at its onset and notify landowners by electronic means (WhatsApp, email, etc.). With this remote inspection there has been a significant increase in the number of infraction notices, criminal actions, agreements for civil reparation of damage and public civil suits. By seeking to identify illegal deforestation in progress (in flagrant situations), the Public Prosecutor’s Office has prevented such events from turning into major deforestation. Preliminary data indicate that the practice of monitoring and notifications by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and environmental control agencies has increased law enforcement on deforestation and fires in that municipality and halted infractions at their inception. The challenge now is to determine the extent to which this method can be replicated in broader territories and other biomes such as Amazonia and Pantanal.","PeriodicalId":50517,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Conservation","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Public Prosecutor’s Office’s experience using Global Forest Watch to monitor and deter deforestation in the Cerrado\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Angelo Correa Gonzaga, José Guilherme Roquette, Fabio Angeoletto, Vinicius De Freitas Silgueiro, Luis Otávio Bau Macedo, Ana Paula Valdiones, Normandes Matos da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0376892924000110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The Cerrado biome is a global biodiversity hotspot, and more than half of its area has been devastated in recent decades. Nevertheless, environmental enforcement agencies have a low capacity for monitoring and curbing illegal deforestation and fires. In this context, the local unit of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Itiquira, Mato Grosso, has been experimenting since mid-2018 with the Global Forest Watch platform to detect illegal deforestation at its onset and notify landowners by electronic means (WhatsApp, email, etc.). With this remote inspection there has been a significant increase in the number of infraction notices, criminal actions, agreements for civil reparation of damage and public civil suits. By seeking to identify illegal deforestation in progress (in flagrant situations), the Public Prosecutor’s Office has prevented such events from turning into major deforestation. Preliminary data indicate that the practice of monitoring and notifications by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and environmental control agencies has increased law enforcement on deforestation and fires in that municipality and halted infractions at their inception. The challenge now is to determine the extent to which this method can be replicated in broader territories and other biomes such as Amazonia and Pantanal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Conservation\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892924000110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892924000110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 塞拉多生物群落是全球生物多样性的热点地区,近几十年来,其一半以上的面积遭到破坏。然而,环境执法机构监测和遏制非法砍伐森林和火灾的能力却很低。在这种情况下,马托格罗索州伊蒂基拉市检察官办公室的地方部门自 2018 年年中以来一直在试用全球森林观察平台,以便在非法砍伐森林开始时就能发现,并通过电子手段(WhatsApp、电子邮件等)通知土地所有者。通过这种远程检查,违规通知、刑事诉讼、民事损害赔偿协议和公共民事诉讼的数量显著增加。通过努力查明正在进行中的非法毁林行为(在明目张胆的情况下),检察官办公室防止了此类事件演变成重大毁林行为。初步数据表明,检察院和环境控制机构的监测和通报做法加强了对该市毁林和火灾的执法力度,并在违法行为发生之初就予以制止。现在的挑战是确定在更广阔的地区和其他生物群落(如亚马孙和潘塔纳尔)推广这种方法的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Public Prosecutor’s Office’s experience using Global Forest Watch to monitor and deter deforestation in the Cerrado
Summary The Cerrado biome is a global biodiversity hotspot, and more than half of its area has been devastated in recent decades. Nevertheless, environmental enforcement agencies have a low capacity for monitoring and curbing illegal deforestation and fires. In this context, the local unit of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Itiquira, Mato Grosso, has been experimenting since mid-2018 with the Global Forest Watch platform to detect illegal deforestation at its onset and notify landowners by electronic means (WhatsApp, email, etc.). With this remote inspection there has been a significant increase in the number of infraction notices, criminal actions, agreements for civil reparation of damage and public civil suits. By seeking to identify illegal deforestation in progress (in flagrant situations), the Public Prosecutor’s Office has prevented such events from turning into major deforestation. Preliminary data indicate that the practice of monitoring and notifications by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and environmental control agencies has increased law enforcement on deforestation and fires in that municipality and halted infractions at their inception. The challenge now is to determine the extent to which this method can be replicated in broader territories and other biomes such as Amazonia and Pantanal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Conservation
Environmental Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Conservation is one of the longest-standing, most highly-cited of the interdisciplinary environmental science journals. It includes research papers, reports, comments, subject reviews, and book reviews addressing environmental policy, practice, and natural and social science of environmental concern at the global level, informed by rigorous local level case studies. The journal"s scope is very broad, including issues in human institutions, ecosystem change, resource utilisation, terrestrial biomes, aquatic systems, and coastal and land use management. Environmental Conservation is essential reading for all environmentalists, managers, consultants, agency workers and scientists wishing to keep abreast of current developments in environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信