对中东和北非地区社会契约的实证分析以及数字化在社会契约变革中的作用

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Farid Gasmi, Dorgyles C. M. Kouakou, Paul Noumba Um, Pedro Rojas Milla
{"title":"对中东和北非地区社会契约的实证分析以及数字化在社会契约变革中的作用","authors":"Farid Gasmi,&nbsp;Dorgyles C. M. Kouakou,&nbsp;Paul Noumba Um,&nbsp;Pedro Rojas Milla","doi":"10.1111/ecot.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the social contract (SC) in MENA based on a simple model synthesizing three main characteristics of a SC linking governments and citizens: Participation, Protection, and Provision. Using this 3-P framework, we focus on the role of provision and protection in determining citizen participation, a question that drew much attention following the recent economic and social developments in MENA. We compare our characterization of the SC in MENA and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and find robust empirical evidence that, in MENA, the benefits provided to citizens through improved delivery of basic services have come at the cost of impaired participation. We also find that digital transformation, a potential channel through which the SC may improve, has an inversely <i>U</i>-shaped effect suggesting that institutional changes are called for in MENA countries before their SC is comparable to that of OECD countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"32 4","pages":"1193-1243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical analysis of the social contract in the Middle East and North Africa region and the role of digitalization in its transformation\",\"authors\":\"Farid Gasmi,&nbsp;Dorgyles C. M. Kouakou,&nbsp;Paul Noumba Um,&nbsp;Pedro Rojas Milla\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecot.12415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents an empirical analysis of the social contract (SC) in MENA based on a simple model synthesizing three main characteristics of a SC linking governments and citizens: Participation, Protection, and Provision. Using this 3-P framework, we focus on the role of provision and protection in determining citizen participation, a question that drew much attention following the recent economic and social developments in MENA. We compare our characterization of the SC in MENA and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and find robust empirical evidence that, in MENA, the benefits provided to citizens through improved delivery of basic services have come at the cost of impaired participation. We also find that digital transformation, a potential channel through which the SC may improve, has an inversely <i>U</i>-shaped effect suggesting that institutional changes are called for in MENA countries before their SC is comparable to that of OECD countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"1193-1243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.12415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.12415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于一个简单的模型,综合了连接政府和公民的社会契约(SC)的三个主要特征,对中东和北非地区的社会契约(SC)进行了实证分析:参与、保护和提供。利用这个 3-P 框架,我们重点研究了提供和保护在决定公民参与中的作用,这个问题在中东和北非地区最近的经济和社会发展中引起了广泛关注。我们比较了中东和北非地区以及经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的SC特征,发现有力的经验证据表明,在中东和北非地区,通过改善基本服务的提供为公民带来的好处是以参与度受损为代价的。我们还发现,作为改善公民参与的一个潜在渠道,数字化转型具有反 U 型效应,这表明中东和北非国家需要进行体制改革,才能使其公民参与与经合组织国家相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical analysis of the social contract in the Middle East and North Africa region and the role of digitalization in its transformation

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the social contract (SC) in MENA based on a simple model synthesizing three main characteristics of a SC linking governments and citizens: Participation, Protection, and Provision. Using this 3-P framework, we focus on the role of provision and protection in determining citizen participation, a question that drew much attention following the recent economic and social developments in MENA. We compare our characterization of the SC in MENA and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and find robust empirical evidence that, in MENA, the benefits provided to citizens through improved delivery of basic services have come at the cost of impaired participation. We also find that digital transformation, a potential channel through which the SC may improve, has an inversely U-shaped effect suggesting that institutional changes are called for in MENA countries before their SC is comparable to that of OECD countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信