了解菲律宾英语在求职面试中的不平等性

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
World Englishes Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1111/weng.12662
Julius C. Martinez
{"title":"了解菲律宾英语在求职面试中的不平等性","authors":"Julius C. Martinez","doi":"10.1111/weng.12662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The job interview is an illustrative encounter where inequalities in relation to Philippine English can be apprehended. Drawing on the reported experiences of ten job gatekeepers from various institutions, this study examines the complex ways job candidates are accepted and rejected on the basis of their spoken languages. The findings are as follows: First, there are normative varieties privileged by gatekeepers in the job interview. Access to these languages is shaped by social class and ethnolinguistic membership. Consequently, candidates were rejected because they could not speak languages that gatekeepers regarded as legitimate. It is also found that interview decisions were influenced by local and global markets, which are themselves outcomes of globalization and capitalism. Based on these findings, two suggestions are made to further understand the ways Philippine English (re)produces inequalities. The first is a rethinking of its emancipatory effects and the second concerns the politics of recognition in Philippine English studies.","PeriodicalId":23780,"journal":{"name":"World Englishes","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding inequalities of Philippine English in job interviews\",\"authors\":\"Julius C. Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/weng.12662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The job interview is an illustrative encounter where inequalities in relation to Philippine English can be apprehended. Drawing on the reported experiences of ten job gatekeepers from various institutions, this study examines the complex ways job candidates are accepted and rejected on the basis of their spoken languages. The findings are as follows: First, there are normative varieties privileged by gatekeepers in the job interview. Access to these languages is shaped by social class and ethnolinguistic membership. Consequently, candidates were rejected because they could not speak languages that gatekeepers regarded as legitimate. It is also found that interview decisions were influenced by local and global markets, which are themselves outcomes of globalization and capitalism. Based on these findings, two suggestions are made to further understand the ways Philippine English (re)produces inequalities. The first is a rethinking of its emancipatory effects and the second concerns the politics of recognition in Philippine English studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Englishes\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Englishes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12662\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Englishes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

求职面试是菲律宾英语不平等现象的一个例证。本研究以来自不同机构的十位求职者的经历为基础,探讨了求职者因其口语而被接受和拒绝的复杂方式。研究结果如下:首先,在求职面试中,有一些规范的语言品种受到把关人的青睐。这些语言的使用权受社会阶层和民族语言成员身份的影响。因此,应聘者被拒绝的原因是他们不会说把关人认为合法的语言。研究还发现,面试决定受到本地和全球市场的影响,而本地和全球市场本身就是全球化和资本主义的结果。基于这些发现,我们提出了两项建议,以进一步理解菲律宾英语(重新)产生不平等的方式。首先是重新思考菲律宾英语的解放效应,其次是菲律宾英语研究中的认可政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding inequalities of Philippine English in job interviews
The job interview is an illustrative encounter where inequalities in relation to Philippine English can be apprehended. Drawing on the reported experiences of ten job gatekeepers from various institutions, this study examines the complex ways job candidates are accepted and rejected on the basis of their spoken languages. The findings are as follows: First, there are normative varieties privileged by gatekeepers in the job interview. Access to these languages is shaped by social class and ethnolinguistic membership. Consequently, candidates were rejected because they could not speak languages that gatekeepers regarded as legitimate. It is also found that interview decisions were influenced by local and global markets, which are themselves outcomes of globalization and capitalism. Based on these findings, two suggestions are made to further understand the ways Philippine English (re)produces inequalities. The first is a rethinking of its emancipatory effects and the second concerns the politics of recognition in Philippine English studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Englishes
World Englishes Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: World Englishes is integrative in its scope and includes theoretical and applied studies on language, literature and English teaching, with emphasis on cross-cultural perspectives and identities. The journal provides recent research, critical and evaluative papers, and reviews from Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and the Americas. Thematic special issues and colloquia appear regularly. Special sections such as ''Comments / Replies'' and ''Forum'' promote open discussions and debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信