反性别意识形态与男性圈对女同性恋的描述。

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Lesbian Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1080/10894160.2024.2352996
Michael Vallerga
{"title":"反性别意识形态与男性圈对女同性恋的描述。","authors":"Michael Vallerga","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2024.2352996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent far-right and religious fundamentalist coalitions in Europe and the U.S. seek populist support through \"anti-gender\" rhetoric. These coalitions are in alignment with the manosphere in endorsement of biological essentialism and antifeminist, anti-LGBTQ stances. Based upon an examination of the data gathered for projects examining two manosphere communities (Red Pill and Incel), a clear picture emerges wherein they casually disparage lesbians and conflate lesbians with feminists, unearthing 1970s and 1980s political lesbian writings and discussing them out of context. Ironically, the dissatisfaction with gender relations that drove lesbian separatists at the time drives the manosphere, especially Incel, to be even more misogynistic and violent in service of their feelings of entitlement to women's bodies. This can be understood as part of a backlash against feminist and LGBTQ rights that is empowering fascists using anti-gender rhetoric in their rise to power.</p>","PeriodicalId":46044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-gender ideology and the depiction of lesbians in the manosphere.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Vallerga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10894160.2024.2352996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent far-right and religious fundamentalist coalitions in Europe and the U.S. seek populist support through \\\"anti-gender\\\" rhetoric. These coalitions are in alignment with the manosphere in endorsement of biological essentialism and antifeminist, anti-LGBTQ stances. Based upon an examination of the data gathered for projects examining two manosphere communities (Red Pill and Incel), a clear picture emerges wherein they casually disparage lesbians and conflate lesbians with feminists, unearthing 1970s and 1980s political lesbian writings and discussing them out of context. Ironically, the dissatisfaction with gender relations that drove lesbian separatists at the time drives the manosphere, especially Incel, to be even more misogynistic and violent in service of their feelings of entitlement to women's bodies. This can be understood as part of a backlash against feminist and LGBTQ rights that is empowering fascists using anti-gender rhetoric in their rise to power.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lesbian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lesbian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2024.2352996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2024.2352996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,欧洲和美国的极右翼和宗教原教旨主义联盟通过 "反性别 "言论寻求民粹主义的支持。这些联盟在认可生物本质论和反女权主义、反 LGBTQ 的立场上与男性圈是一致的。根据对两个男人圈社区(红色药丸(Red Pill)和乱伦(Incel))的研究项目所收集的数据进行分析,我们可以清楚地看到,他们随意贬低女同性恋者,将女同性恋者与女权主义者混为一谈,挖掘出 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代女同性恋者的政治著作,并对其进行断章取义的讨论。具有讽刺意味的是,当时女同性恋分离主义者对性别关系的不满促使男性圈(尤其是 Incel)更加厌恶女性,更加暴力,以满足他们对女性身体的权利感。这可以理解为对女权主义者和 LGBTQ 权利的反弹的一部分,而这种反弹正使法西斯分子在上台时使用反性别言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-gender ideology and the depiction of lesbians in the manosphere.

Recent far-right and religious fundamentalist coalitions in Europe and the U.S. seek populist support through "anti-gender" rhetoric. These coalitions are in alignment with the manosphere in endorsement of biological essentialism and antifeminist, anti-LGBTQ stances. Based upon an examination of the data gathered for projects examining two manosphere communities (Red Pill and Incel), a clear picture emerges wherein they casually disparage lesbians and conflate lesbians with feminists, unearthing 1970s and 1980s political lesbian writings and discussing them out of context. Ironically, the dissatisfaction with gender relations that drove lesbian separatists at the time drives the manosphere, especially Incel, to be even more misogynistic and violent in service of their feelings of entitlement to women's bodies. This can be understood as part of a backlash against feminist and LGBTQ rights that is empowering fascists using anti-gender rhetoric in their rise to power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lesbian Studies
Journal of Lesbian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lesbian Studies examines the cultural, historical, and interpersonal impact of the lesbian experience on society, keeping all readers—professional, academic, or general—informed and up to date on current findings, resources, and community concerns. Independent scholars, professors, students, and lay people will find this interdisciplinary journal essential on the topic of lesbian studies!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信