优化除草剂的选择,以便在萌芽前控制甘蔗中的痒草和柏藤牵牛花。

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Alexandre Piassa, Gabriella Onila do Nascimento Soares, Leandro Tropaldi, Pedro Jacob Christofoletti
{"title":"优化除草剂的选择,以便在萌芽前控制甘蔗中的痒草和柏藤牵牛花。","authors":"Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Alexandre Piassa, Gabriella Onila do Nascimento Soares, Leandro Tropaldi, Pedro Jacob Christofoletti","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2024.2352321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of herbicides in association to control <i>Rottboellia exaltata</i> and <i>Ipomoea quamoclit</i> during pre-emergence while also to evaluate the potential impact on the sugarcane. The experimental design employed a randomized block with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1 - no herbicide application; 2 - indaziflam + sulfentrazone; 3 - indaziflam + diclosulam; 4 - indaziflam + tebuthiuron; 5 - flumioxazin + diclosulam, 6 - flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone and 7 - clomazone + sulfentrazone. The evaluated parameters were: percentage of weeds control, green coverage percentage (Canopeo® system), weed biomass (g m<sup>-2</sup>), itchgrass height, and sugarcane tiller. Several herbicide associations have been proven effective alternatives for managing itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory. The most successful treatments for itchgrass control were indaziflam + tebuthiuron (100%) and indaziflam + diclosulam (97%), whereas for cypressvine morningglory, the betters were indaziflam + sulfentrazone (97%), indaziflam + diclosulam (98%), indaziflam + tebuthiuron (97%), flumioxazin + diclosulam (94%), and clomazone + sulfentrazone (96%). All treatments reduced the weed biomass, with indaziflam + tebuthiuron being the safest option for protecting sugarcane.</p>","PeriodicalId":15720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing herbicide selection for pre-emergence control of itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory in sugarcane.\",\"authors\":\"Rosilaine Araldi de Castro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de Castro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de Castro, Alexandre Piassa, Gabriella Onila do Nascimento Soares, Leandro Tropaldi, Pedro Jacob Christofoletti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03601234.2024.2352321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of herbicides in association to control <i>Rottboellia exaltata</i> and <i>Ipomoea quamoclit</i> during pre-emergence while also to evaluate the potential impact on the sugarcane. The experimental design employed a randomized block with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1 - no herbicide application; 2 - indaziflam + sulfentrazone; 3 - indaziflam + diclosulam; 4 - indaziflam + tebuthiuron; 5 - flumioxazin + diclosulam, 6 - flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone and 7 - clomazone + sulfentrazone. The evaluated parameters were: percentage of weeds control, green coverage percentage (Canopeo® system), weed biomass (g m<sup>-2</sup>), itchgrass height, and sugarcane tiller. Several herbicide associations have been proven effective alternatives for managing itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory. The most successful treatments for itchgrass control were indaziflam + tebuthiuron (100%) and indaziflam + diclosulam (97%), whereas for cypressvine morningglory, the betters were indaziflam + sulfentrazone (97%), indaziflam + diclosulam (98%), indaziflam + tebuthiuron (97%), flumioxazin + diclosulam (94%), and clomazone + sulfentrazone (96%). All treatments reduced the weed biomass, with indaziflam + tebuthiuron being the safest option for protecting sugarcane.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2352321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2352321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估除草剂在萌芽前控制外稃草(Rottboellia exaltata)和藜芦(Ipomoea quamoclit)的效果,同时评估其对甘蔗的潜在影响。实验设计采用随机区组,有七个处理和四个重复。处理为1-不施用除草剂;2-茚虫威+磺草松;3-茚虫威+双唑草胺;4-茚虫威+特丁噻草隆;5-氟草胺+双唑草胺;6-氟草胺+吡嘧磺隆;7-氯马隆+磺草松。评估参数包括:杂草控制率、绿色覆盖率(Canopeo® 系统)、杂草生物量(克米-2)、痒草高度和甘蔗分蘖。几种除草剂组合已被证明是管理痒草和柏树牵牛花的有效替代品。控制痒痒草最成功的除草剂是茚虫威+特丁噻草隆(100%)和茚虫威+双唑草胺(97%),而对于柏藤牵牛花来说,最好的除草剂是茚虫威+特丁噻草隆(100%)和茚虫威+双唑草胺(97%)、茚虫威+磺草酮(97%)、茚虫威+双氯磺草胺(98%)、茚虫威+特丁硫隆(97%)、氟吡氧乙酸嗪+双氯磺草胺(94%)和氯马宗+磺草酮(96%)。所有处理都能减少杂草的生物量,其中茚虫威+特丁噻草隆是保护甘蔗最安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing herbicide selection for pre-emergence control of itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory in sugarcane.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of herbicides in association to control Rottboellia exaltata and Ipomoea quamoclit during pre-emergence while also to evaluate the potential impact on the sugarcane. The experimental design employed a randomized block with seven treatments and four replications. The treatments were: 1 - no herbicide application; 2 - indaziflam + sulfentrazone; 3 - indaziflam + diclosulam; 4 - indaziflam + tebuthiuron; 5 - flumioxazin + diclosulam, 6 - flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone and 7 - clomazone + sulfentrazone. The evaluated parameters were: percentage of weeds control, green coverage percentage (Canopeo® system), weed biomass (g m-2), itchgrass height, and sugarcane tiller. Several herbicide associations have been proven effective alternatives for managing itchgrass and cypressvine morningglory. The most successful treatments for itchgrass control were indaziflam + tebuthiuron (100%) and indaziflam + diclosulam (97%), whereas for cypressvine morningglory, the betters were indaziflam + sulfentrazone (97%), indaziflam + diclosulam (98%), indaziflam + tebuthiuron (97%), flumioxazin + diclosulam (94%), and clomazone + sulfentrazone (96%). All treatments reduced the weed biomass, with indaziflam + tebuthiuron being the safest option for protecting sugarcane.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted/indexed in: Agricola; Analytical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); CAB Abstracts; CAB AGBiotech News and Information; CAB Irrigation & Drainage Abstracts; CAB Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts; Chemical Abstracts Service Plus; CSA Aluminum Industry Abstracts; CSA ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology and Engineering; CSA ASFA 3 Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Quality; CSA ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; CSA Ecology Abstracts; CSA Entomology Abstracts; CSA Environmental Engineering Abstracts; CSA Health & Safety Science Abstracts; CSA Pollution Abstracts; CSA Toxicology Abstracts; CSA Water Resource Abstracts; EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences; Elsevier Engineering Information: EMBASE/Excerpta Medica/ Engineering Index/COMPENDEX PLUS; Environment Abstracts; Environmental Knowledge; Food Science and Technology Abstracts; Geo Abstracts; Geobase; Food Science; Index Medicus/ MEDLINE; INIST-Pascal/ CNRS; NIOSHTIC; ISI BIOSIS Previews; Pesticides; Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes: Analytical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; PubSCIENCE; Reference Update; Research Alert; Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE); and Water Resources Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信