A comparative study of fractional CO2 laser with topical triamcinolone acetonide versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of alopecia areata.

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring alopecia of chronic autoimmune etiology with heterogenous severity against the anagen hair follicle over the scalp, beard, or any part of the body and is associated with a significant psychological morbidity in the mental status of the patients leading the patients to seek treatment for cosmetic reasons. The management of AA is very unpredictable and is associated with various cosmetic adverse effects. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel procedure of laser-assisted drug delivery system of steroids with the first-line procedure of intralesional steroids (ILS) for the treatment of patchy AA.

Aims and objectives: To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of fractional CO₂ laser in combination with topical triamcinolone acetonide aqueous solution and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide as a monotherapy and in the treatment of AA.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 patchy AA patients were included in this study. Patients were randomized into two equal groups: Group A and Group B with 30 patients in each group using a computer-generated block randomization. Patients in Group A received fractional CO₂ laser with topical triamcinolone acetonide aqueous solution and Group B received ILS. Both groups received treatment for five settings with each setting a gap of 3 weeks. The efficacy and safety of treatment modalities in both groups were assessed using global photograph assessment (GPA)-scale, lesional area density score percentage of improvement (LAD score improvement %), visual discomfort scale (VDS), visual analogue scale, and documentation of adverse effects in each setting.

Results: Efficacy of treatment modality-assessed using means score of GPA-scale and LAD score improvement % suggests quicker results to patients in Group B in initial settings but drastic improvement happens to patients in Group A in subsequent settings. At the end of 5th setting, GPA-scale and LAD score improvement % suggest maximum efficacy in patients in Group A and they are statistically significant (P-value < 0.001). The mean VDS in both groups suggests maximum discomfort in Group A, yet the patient satisfaction at the end of 5th setting was maximum with patients in Group A and they are statistically significant (P-value < 0.001). Cosmetic notable adverse effect of atrophy of skin was documented in 30% of patients in Group B.

Conclusion: This study showed that fractional CO₂ laser with topical triamcinolone acetonide is a better treatment modality than the intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of AA with respect to efficacy, safety, and adverse events.