植入式腰椎的有限元分析:开放式椎板切除术加 PLF 和开放式椎板切除术加 TLIF 手术方法对 L3-L4 FSU 的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kishore Pradeep , Bidyut Pal , Kaushik Mukherjee , Gautam M. Shetty
{"title":"植入式腰椎的有限元分析:开放式椎板切除术加 PLF 和开放式椎板切除术加 TLIF 手术方法对 L3-L4 FSU 的影响","authors":"Kishore Pradeep ,&nbsp;Bidyut Pal ,&nbsp;Kaushik Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Gautam M. Shetty","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several finite element (FE) studies reported performances of various lumbar fusion surgical approaches. However, comparative studies on the performance of Open Laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) surgical approaches are rare. In the current FE study, the variation in ranges of motions (ROM), stress-strain distributions in an implanted functional spinal unit (FSU) and caudal adjacent soft structures between OL-PLF and OL-TLIF virtual models were investigated. The implanted lumbar spine FE models were developed from subject-specific computed tomography images of an intact spine and solved for physiological loadings such as compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. Reductions in the ROMs of L1-L5 (49 % to 59 %) and L3-L4 implanted FSUs (91 % to 96 %) were observed for both models. Under all the loading cases, the maximum von Mises strain observed in the implanted segment of both models exceeds the mean compressive yield strain for the vertebra. The maximum von Mises stress and strain observed on the caudal adjacent soft structures of both the implanted models are at least 22 % higher than the natural spine model. The findings indicate the risk of failure in the implanted FSUs and higher chances of adjacent segment degeneration for both models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analysis of implanted lumbar spine: Effects of open laminectomy plus PLF and open laminectomy plus TLIF surgical approaches on L3-L4 FSU\",\"authors\":\"Kishore Pradeep ,&nbsp;Bidyut Pal ,&nbsp;Kaushik Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Gautam M. Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Several finite element (FE) studies reported performances of various lumbar fusion surgical approaches. However, comparative studies on the performance of Open Laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) surgical approaches are rare. In the current FE study, the variation in ranges of motions (ROM), stress-strain distributions in an implanted functional spinal unit (FSU) and caudal adjacent soft structures between OL-PLF and OL-TLIF virtual models were investigated. The implanted lumbar spine FE models were developed from subject-specific computed tomography images of an intact spine and solved for physiological loadings such as compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. Reductions in the ROMs of L1-L5 (49 % to 59 %) and L3-L4 implanted FSUs (91 % to 96 %) were observed for both models. Under all the loading cases, the maximum von Mises strain observed in the implanted segment of both models exceeds the mean compressive yield strain for the vertebra. The maximum von Mises stress and strain observed on the caudal adjacent soft structures of both the implanted models are at least 22 % higher than the natural spine model. The findings indicate the risk of failure in the implanted FSUs and higher chances of adjacent segment degeneration for both models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000791\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多项有限元(FE)研究报告了各种腰椎融合手术方法的性能。然而,关于开放式椎板切除术加后侧融合术(OL-PLF)和开放式椎板切除术加椎间融合术(OL-TLIF)手术方法性能的比较研究却很少见。在当前的 FE 研究中,研究人员调查了 OL-PLF 和 OL-TLIF 虚拟模型之间的运动范围 (ROM)、植入功能脊柱单元 (FSU) 和尾部邻近软结构的应力应变分布。植入的腰椎 FE 模型是根据完整脊柱的特定计算机断层扫描图像建立的,并对压缩、屈曲、伸展和侧弯等生理负荷进行了求解。在这两种模型中,L1-L5(49% 至 59%)和 L3-L4 植入式 FSU 的 ROM 均有所减少(91% 至 96%)。在所有加载情况下,两种模型植入部分的最大冯米斯应变都超过了椎体的平均压缩屈服应力。在两个植入模型的尾部邻近软结构上观察到的最大 von Mises 应力和应变比天然脊柱模型至少高出 22%。研究结果表明,植入的 FSU 存在失效风险,而且两种模型的邻近节段发生退化的几率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite element analysis of implanted lumbar spine: Effects of open laminectomy plus PLF and open laminectomy plus TLIF surgical approaches on L3-L4 FSU

Several finite element (FE) studies reported performances of various lumbar fusion surgical approaches. However, comparative studies on the performance of Open Laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) surgical approaches are rare. In the current FE study, the variation in ranges of motions (ROM), stress-strain distributions in an implanted functional spinal unit (FSU) and caudal adjacent soft structures between OL-PLF and OL-TLIF virtual models were investigated. The implanted lumbar spine FE models were developed from subject-specific computed tomography images of an intact spine and solved for physiological loadings such as compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. Reductions in the ROMs of L1-L5 (49 % to 59 %) and L3-L4 implanted FSUs (91 % to 96 %) were observed for both models. Under all the loading cases, the maximum von Mises strain observed in the implanted segment of both models exceeds the mean compressive yield strain for the vertebra. The maximum von Mises stress and strain observed on the caudal adjacent soft structures of both the implanted models are at least 22 % higher than the natural spine model. The findings indicate the risk of failure in the implanted FSUs and higher chances of adjacent segment degeneration for both models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信