使用比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦-阿拉非酰胺的病毒学抑制期成年 HIV-1 感染者改用固定剂量多拉韦林(100 毫克)联合伊斯拉特韦(0-75 毫克)每日一次:一项第 3 期随机对照双盲非劣效性试验的 48 周结果。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Lancet Hiv Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4
Anthony M Mills, Giuliano Rizzardini, Moti N Ramgopal, Olayemi O Osiyemi, Johannes R Bogner, Debbie P Hagins, Roger Paredes, Jacques Reynes, Jürgen K Rockstroh, Andrew Carr, Feng-Hsiu Su, Stephanie O Klopfer, Karen Eves, Rebeca M Plank, Todd Correll, Michelle C Fox
{"title":"使用比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦-阿拉非酰胺的病毒学抑制期成年 HIV-1 感染者改用固定剂量多拉韦林(100 毫克)联合伊斯拉特韦(0-75 毫克)每日一次:一项第 3 期随机对照双盲非劣效性试验的 48 周结果。","authors":"Anthony M Mills, Giuliano Rizzardini, Moti N Ramgopal, Olayemi O Osiyemi, Johannes R Bogner, Debbie P Hagins, Roger Paredes, Jacques Reynes, Jürgen K Rockstroh, Andrew Carr, Feng-Hsiu Su, Stephanie O Klopfer, Karen Eves, Rebeca M Plank, Todd Correll, Michelle C Fox","doi":"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.</p>","PeriodicalId":48725,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Hiv","volume":" ","pages":"e357-e368"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony M Mills, Giuliano Rizzardini, Moti N Ramgopal, Olayemi O Osiyemi, Johannes R Bogner, Debbie P Hagins, Roger Paredes, Jacques Reynes, Jürgen K Rockstroh, Andrew Carr, Feng-Hsiu Su, Stephanie O Klopfer, Karen Eves, Rebeca M Plank, Todd Correll, Michelle C Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e357-e368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Hiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍多拉韦林和伊斯拉曲韦是一种研究中的每日一次治疗方案,具有很高的抗病毒效力、良好的安全性和耐受性以及较低的耐药倾向。我们研究了在病毒学抑制的成年 HIV-1 感染者中将比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦-阿拉非那胺换成多拉韦林(100 毫克)和伊斯拉韦(0-75 毫克)的方案:我们在 11 个国家的 89 个研究、社区和医院诊所开展了一项 3 期、多中心、随机、主动对照、双盲、双哑药、非劣效试验。年龄在 18 岁或 18 岁以上、服用比特拉韦(50 毫克)、恩曲他滨(200 毫克)和替诺福韦阿afenamide(25 毫克)至少 3 个月且 HIV-1 RNA 拷贝数少于 50 个/毫升、既往或当前治疗方案无病毒学失败史的成人被随机分配(1:通过计算机生成的随机分配表(以四人为单位进行分块随机分配),将参与者随机分配为改用多拉韦林(100 毫克)和伊斯拉曲韦(0-75 毫克),或继续每天口服一次比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦阿afenamide,所有参与者均服用匹配的安慰剂。在第 48 周之前,参与者、研究人员、研究工作人员和参与研究药物给药或参与者临床评估的赞助商人员均不知道治疗分配。每次就诊时,研究人员都会指导参与者从两瓶药物中各取一片服用,一瓶是研究药物,一瓶是安慰剂,每天服用一次,并在基线和第 4、12、24、36 和 48 周时对参与者进行评估。主要终点是在第48周时,在全部分析组(即所有至少接受过一次研究药物治疗的参与者;美国食品药品管理局快照;预设非劣效边际为4%)中,HIV-1 RNA拷贝数大于或等于每毫升50个的参与者比例。该研究仍在进行中,所有剩余参与者都在进行治疗后随访,并已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记,编号为 NCT04223791:我们在 2020 年 2 月 18 日至 9 月 3 日期间对 726 人进行了资格筛选,其中 643 人(88-6%)被随机分配到治疗组(183 人 [28-5%] 为女性,460 人 [71-5%] 为男性)。322名参与者转为接受多拉韦林(100毫克)和伊斯拉曲韦(0-75毫克)治疗,321名参与者继续接受比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦丙烯酰胺治疗(两名被分配接受比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦丙烯酰胺治疗的参与者[一人偏离方案,一人退出]未接受治疗)。第 48 周分析的最后一次随访于 2021 年 8 月 26 日进行。第48周时,多拉韦林和异曲韦酯组的322名参与者中有2人(0-6%)的HIV-1 RNA拷贝数大于或等于每毫升50个(差异为0-3%,95% CI为-1-2至2-0),而比特格韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦阿拉非酰胺组的319名参与者中有1人(0-3%)的HIV-1 RNA拷贝数大于或等于每毫升50个(差异为0-3%,95% CI为-1-2至2-0)。按方案分析显示出一致的结果。与比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦阿拉非酰胺组的23人[7-2%]相比,多拉韦林和伊斯拉曲韦组中有25人(7-8%)出现头痛;101人(31-4%)出现感染,而替诺福韦阿拉非酰胺组中有98人(30-7%)出现感染;各组中均有8人(2-5%)因不良事件而中止治疗。伊斯拉韦酯和多拉韦林组有32人(9-9%)发生了与治疗相关的不良事件,而比特拉韦酯、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦丙烯酰胺组有38人(11-9%)发生了不良事件。48周时,伊斯拉曲韦和多拉韦林组的CD4细胞计数(平均变化-19-7个细胞/μL)和总淋巴细胞计数(平均变化-0-20×109/L)均有所下降:第48周时,改用每日服用多拉韦林(100毫克)和伊斯拉曲韦(0-75毫克)的疗效并不优于比特拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦丙烯酰胺。然而,CD4细胞和总淋巴细胞计数的下降并不支持进一步开发每日一次的多拉韦林(100毫克)和异拉曲韦(0-75毫克):资金来源:默克公司的子公司默沙东(Merck Sharp & Dohme)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

Background: Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.

Methods: We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.

Findings: We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.

Interpretation: Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Hiv
Lancet Hiv IMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASES&-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: The Lancet HIV is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge with an Impact Factor of 16.1. It is dedicated to publishing original research, evidence-based reviews, and insightful features that advocate for change in or illuminates HIV clinical practice. The journal aims to provide a holistic view of the pandemic, covering clinical, epidemiological, and operational disciplines. It publishes content on innovative treatments and the biological research behind them, novel methods of service delivery, and new approaches to confronting HIV/AIDS worldwide. The Lancet HIV publishes various types of content including articles, reviews, comments, correspondences, and viewpoints. It also publishes series that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in HIV. The journal is indexed by several abstracting and indexing services, including Crossref, Embase, Essential Science Indicators, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCIE and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信