促进公平:了解、解决和减轻医学教育评估中的偏见。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Clinical obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000870
Virginia Sheffield, Mary Finta, Abigail Erinc, Tammy L Sonn, Jennifer Reilly Lukela
{"title":"促进公平:了解、解决和减轻医学教育评估中的偏见。","authors":"Virginia Sheffield, Mary Finta, Abigail Erinc, Tammy L Sonn, Jennifer Reilly Lukela","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the growing presence of women and historically underrepresented groups in academic medicine, significant disparities remain. This article examines a key aspect of these disparities: biases in assessment and learning environments. Reviewing current literature, including in OBGYN, reveals persistent gender and racial biases in subjective clinical narrative assessments. The paper then outlines a 2-pronged approach for change: first, enhancing the learning environment, and subsequently, providing targeted recommendations for individuals, academic leaders, and healthcare institutions to effectively address these biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Equity: Understanding, Addressing, and Mitigating Bias in Assessment in Medical Education.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Sheffield, Mary Finta, Abigail Erinc, Tammy L Sonn, Jennifer Reilly Lukela\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the growing presence of women and historically underrepresented groups in academic medicine, significant disparities remain. This article examines a key aspect of these disparities: biases in assessment and learning environments. Reviewing current literature, including in OBGYN, reveals persistent gender and racial biases in subjective clinical narrative assessments. The paper then outlines a 2-pronged approach for change: first, enhancing the learning environment, and subsequently, providing targeted recommendations for individuals, academic leaders, and healthcare institutions to effectively address these biases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000870\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管女性和历史上代表性不足的群体在医学学术界的人数不断增加,但仍然存在巨大的差距。本文探讨了这些差距的一个关键方面:评估和学习环境中的偏见。回顾当前的文献,包括妇产科文献,发现在主观临床叙述评估中持续存在性别和种族偏见。本文随后概述了一种双管齐下的变革方法:首先是改善学习环境,然后为个人、学术领袖和医疗机构提供有针对性的建议,以有效解决这些偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Equity: Understanding, Addressing, and Mitigating Bias in Assessment in Medical Education.

Despite the growing presence of women and historically underrepresented groups in academic medicine, significant disparities remain. This article examines a key aspect of these disparities: biases in assessment and learning environments. Reviewing current literature, including in OBGYN, reveals persistent gender and racial biases in subjective clinical narrative assessments. The paper then outlines a 2-pronged approach for change: first, enhancing the learning environment, and subsequently, providing targeted recommendations for individuals, academic leaders, and healthcare institutions to effectively address these biases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology is a complete symposium on one or two timely topics of interest in obstetrics and gynecology. For each quarterly issue, two prominent guest editors solicit contributions on key clinical topics of interest to practicing physicians. Procedures, current clinical problems, medical and surgical treatments, and effective diagnostic aids are all carefully reviewed in original articles. The result is an instructive resource that dispenses trustworthy clinical guidance that enhances your understanding of key areas of your practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信