社区药房参与新型阿片类药物和药物处置相关服务的障碍和动机因素。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mitchell J. Barnett , Brooke Clubbs , Ashley Woodyard , Valerie Wasem , Joyce Prinze , Anuradha Tirupasur , Sina Hosseini , Madison Kim , Faviola Gallardo , Natalie Polich , Shane Desselle
{"title":"社区药房参与新型阿片类药物和药物处置相关服务的障碍和动机因素。","authors":"Mitchell J. Barnett ,&nbsp;Brooke Clubbs ,&nbsp;Ashley Woodyard ,&nbsp;Valerie Wasem ,&nbsp;Joyce Prinze ,&nbsp;Anuradha Tirupasur ,&nbsp;Sina Hosseini ,&nbsp;Madison Kim ,&nbsp;Faviola Gallardo ,&nbsp;Natalie Polich ,&nbsp;Shane Desselle","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to explore and identify motivational factors and barriers for pharmacy personnel participation in specific opioid mitigation programs, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as an investigational framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A naturalistic inquiry method was employed involving semi-structured interviews with pharmacy personnel to assess their intentions, attitudes, normative beliefs, and behaviors towards participating in naloxone dispensing and provision of at-home drug disposal solutions. Purposive sampling was utilized to recruit participants, with saturation achieved after 12 interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded to identify recurring themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four primary themes emerged: 1) the value and benefits of helping others, emphasizing societal, patient, and environmental benefits; 2) limits and barriers to participation, including financial concerns, management support, and time constraints; 3) pharmacists’ intrinsic motivators, highlighting personal motivations and differentiation between programs for specific patient types; and 4) program implementation challenges and strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings underscore the applicability of the TPB in understanding pharmacy engagement in opioid abatement programs. Despite facing barriers such as financial considerations and time constraints, the overall positive attitudes towards the programs indicate a strong motivation to contribute to public health efforts. Addressing identified barriers and leveraging motivators could enhance participation, potentially mitigating the opioid crisis. Future research should incorporate patient perspectives to fully understand the impact and effectiveness of pharmacy-led interventions, such as naloxone dispensing and disposal solutions, in opioid misuse prevention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"20 8","pages":"Pages 713-722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and motivational factors for engaging in novel opioid and medication disposal-related services in community pharmacies\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell J. Barnett ,&nbsp;Brooke Clubbs ,&nbsp;Ashley Woodyard ,&nbsp;Valerie Wasem ,&nbsp;Joyce Prinze ,&nbsp;Anuradha Tirupasur ,&nbsp;Sina Hosseini ,&nbsp;Madison Kim ,&nbsp;Faviola Gallardo ,&nbsp;Natalie Polich ,&nbsp;Shane Desselle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to explore and identify motivational factors and barriers for pharmacy personnel participation in specific opioid mitigation programs, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as an investigational framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A naturalistic inquiry method was employed involving semi-structured interviews with pharmacy personnel to assess their intentions, attitudes, normative beliefs, and behaviors towards participating in naloxone dispensing and provision of at-home drug disposal solutions. Purposive sampling was utilized to recruit participants, with saturation achieved after 12 interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded to identify recurring themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four primary themes emerged: 1) the value and benefits of helping others, emphasizing societal, patient, and environmental benefits; 2) limits and barriers to participation, including financial concerns, management support, and time constraints; 3) pharmacists’ intrinsic motivators, highlighting personal motivations and differentiation between programs for specific patient types; and 4) program implementation challenges and strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings underscore the applicability of the TPB in understanding pharmacy engagement in opioid abatement programs. Despite facing barriers such as financial considerations and time constraints, the overall positive attitudes towards the programs indicate a strong motivation to contribute to public health efforts. Addressing identified barriers and leveraging motivators could enhance participation, potentially mitigating the opioid crisis. Future research should incorporate patient perspectives to fully understand the impact and effectiveness of pharmacy-led interventions, such as naloxone dispensing and disposal solutions, in opioid misuse prevention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 713-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124000974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124000974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在以计划行为理论(TPB)为研究框架,探讨并确定药剂师参与特定阿片类药物缓解计划的动机因素和障碍:采用自然调查法,对药剂师进行半结构式访谈,评估他们参与纳洛酮配药和提供居家药物处置解决方案的意图、态度、规范信念和行为。在招募参与者时采用了有目的的抽样方法,在进行了 12 次访谈后达到了饱和。对访谈内容进行了转录和编码,以确定重复出现的主题:出现了四个主要的主题:1)帮助他人的价值和益处,强调社会、患者和环境的益处;2)参与的限制和障碍,包括财务问题、管理支持和时间限制;3)药剂师的内在动机,强调个人动机和针对特定患者类型的不同计划;以及 4)计划实施的挑战和策略:研究结果强调了 TPB 在理解药剂师参与阿片类药物减少计划方面的适用性。尽管面临资金考虑和时间限制等障碍,但人们对计划的总体积极态度表明,他们有强烈的动力为公共卫生工作做出贡献。解决已发现的障碍并利用激励因素可提高参与度,从而有可能缓解阿片类药物危机。未来的研究应纳入患者的观点,以充分了解由药房主导的干预措施(如纳洛酮分配和处置解决方案)在预防阿片类药物滥用方面的影响和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and motivational factors for engaging in novel opioid and medication disposal-related services in community pharmacies

Objective

This study aimed to explore and identify motivational factors and barriers for pharmacy personnel participation in specific opioid mitigation programs, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as an investigational framework.

Methods

A naturalistic inquiry method was employed involving semi-structured interviews with pharmacy personnel to assess their intentions, attitudes, normative beliefs, and behaviors towards participating in naloxone dispensing and provision of at-home drug disposal solutions. Purposive sampling was utilized to recruit participants, with saturation achieved after 12 interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded to identify recurring themes.

Results

Four primary themes emerged: 1) the value and benefits of helping others, emphasizing societal, patient, and environmental benefits; 2) limits and barriers to participation, including financial concerns, management support, and time constraints; 3) pharmacists’ intrinsic motivators, highlighting personal motivations and differentiation between programs for specific patient types; and 4) program implementation challenges and strategies.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the applicability of the TPB in understanding pharmacy engagement in opioid abatement programs. Despite facing barriers such as financial considerations and time constraints, the overall positive attitudes towards the programs indicate a strong motivation to contribute to public health efforts. Addressing identified barriers and leveraging motivators could enhance participation, potentially mitigating the opioid crisis. Future research should incorporate patient perspectives to fully understand the impact and effectiveness of pharmacy-led interventions, such as naloxone dispensing and disposal solutions, in opioid misuse prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信