确定优先事项的组织形式:印度卫生技术评估机构的历史视角和专题分析。

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414
Victoria Y Fan, Abha Mehndiratta, Jubilee Ahazie, Javier Guzman, Shankar Prinja, T Sundararaman, Soumya Swaminathan
{"title":"确定优先事项的组织形式:印度卫生技术评估机构的历史视角和专题分析。","authors":"Victoria Y Fan, Abha Mehndiratta, Jubilee Ahazie, Javier Guzman, Shankar Prinja, T Sundararaman, Soumya Swaminathan","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Countries pursuing universal health coverage must set priorities to determine which benefits to add to a national health program, but the roles that organizations play are less understood. This article investigates the case of the formation of an organization with a mandate for choice of technology for public health interventions and priorities, the Health Technology Assessment India. First, we narrate a chronology of agenda setting and adoption of national policy for organizational formation drawing on historical documentation, publicly available literature, and lived experiences from coauthors. Next, we conduct a thematic analysis that examines windows of opportunity, enabling factors, barriers and conditions, roles of stakeholders, messaging and framing, and specific administrative and bureaucratic tools that facilitated organization formation. This case study shows that organizational formation relied on the identification of multiple champions with sufficient seniority and political authority across a wide group of organizations, forming a coalition of broad base support, who were keen to advance health technology assessment policy development and organizational placement or formation. The champions in turn could use their roles for policy decisions that used private and public events to raise priority and commitment to the decisions, carefully considered organizational placement and formation, and developed the network of organizations for the generation of technical evidence and capacity building for health technology assessment, strengthened by international networks and organizations with financing, expertise, and policymaker relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 3","pages":"2327414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Formation for Priority Setting: Historical Perspectives and Thematic Analysis of India's Health Technology Assessment Agency.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Y Fan, Abha Mehndiratta, Jubilee Ahazie, Javier Guzman, Shankar Prinja, T Sundararaman, Soumya Swaminathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Countries pursuing universal health coverage must set priorities to determine which benefits to add to a national health program, but the roles that organizations play are less understood. This article investigates the case of the formation of an organization with a mandate for choice of technology for public health interventions and priorities, the Health Technology Assessment India. First, we narrate a chronology of agenda setting and adoption of national policy for organizational formation drawing on historical documentation, publicly available literature, and lived experiences from coauthors. Next, we conduct a thematic analysis that examines windows of opportunity, enabling factors, barriers and conditions, roles of stakeholders, messaging and framing, and specific administrative and bureaucratic tools that facilitated organization formation. This case study shows that organizational formation relied on the identification of multiple champions with sufficient seniority and political authority across a wide group of organizations, forming a coalition of broad base support, who were keen to advance health technology assessment policy development and organizational placement or formation. The champions in turn could use their roles for policy decisions that used private and public events to raise priority and commitment to the decisions, carefully considered organizational placement and formation, and developed the network of organizations for the generation of technical evidence and capacity building for health technology assessment, strengthened by international networks and organizations with financing, expertise, and policymaker relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"2327414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health systems and reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

追求全民医保的国家必须确定优先事项,以决定在国家卫生计划中增加哪些福利,但人们对组织所发挥的作用了解较少。本文研究了印度卫生技术评估组织(Health Technology Assessment India)的成立案例,该组织的任务是为公共卫生干预措施和优先事项选择技术。首先,我们借鉴历史文献、公开文献以及共同作者的亲身经历,按时间顺序叙述了组织成立的议程设置和国家政策采纳情况。接下来,我们进行了专题分析,研究了机会之窗、有利因素、障碍和条件、利益相关者的角色、信息传递和框架,以及促进组织形成的具体行政和官僚工具。本案例研究表明,组织的形成有赖于在广泛的组织群体中找到多个具有足够资历和政治权威的拥护者,形成一个具有广泛支持基础的联盟,这些拥护者热衷于推动卫生技术评估政策的制定和组织的定位或形成。这些拥护者反过来又可以利用他们在政策决策中的作用,利用私人和公共活动来提高决策的优先性和承诺,认真考虑组织的安排和组建,并发展组织网络,为卫生技术评估提供技术证据和能力建设,国际网络和具有资金、专业知识和决策者关系的组织加强了这一网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational Formation for Priority Setting: Historical Perspectives and Thematic Analysis of India's Health Technology Assessment Agency.

Countries pursuing universal health coverage must set priorities to determine which benefits to add to a national health program, but the roles that organizations play are less understood. This article investigates the case of the formation of an organization with a mandate for choice of technology for public health interventions and priorities, the Health Technology Assessment India. First, we narrate a chronology of agenda setting and adoption of national policy for organizational formation drawing on historical documentation, publicly available literature, and lived experiences from coauthors. Next, we conduct a thematic analysis that examines windows of opportunity, enabling factors, barriers and conditions, roles of stakeholders, messaging and framing, and specific administrative and bureaucratic tools that facilitated organization formation. This case study shows that organizational formation relied on the identification of multiple champions with sufficient seniority and political authority across a wide group of organizations, forming a coalition of broad base support, who were keen to advance health technology assessment policy development and organizational placement or formation. The champions in turn could use their roles for policy decisions that used private and public events to raise priority and commitment to the decisions, carefully considered organizational placement and formation, and developed the network of organizations for the generation of technical evidence and capacity building for health technology assessment, strengthened by international networks and organizations with financing, expertise, and policymaker relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信