在肩关节不稳症患者中,比较不同的锚栓置入方式。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443
José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado
{"title":"在肩关节不稳症患者中,比较不同的锚栓置入方式。","authors":"José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\n <i>to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\n <i>retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\n <i>the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).</i>\n </p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.</i> <b><i>Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.\",\"authors\":\"José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\\n <i>to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\\n <i>retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\\n <i>the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.</i> <b><i>Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在关节镜治疗肩关节不稳定时,比较 3 点钟和 5 点钟方向锚定定位的影像学效果。 方法:对2013年1月至2018年1月期间由Unimed BH医院的两名肩关节外科医生手术的36名患者进行回顾性研究。每位外科医生只使用了 3 点钟或 5 点钟方向的其中一个门户。术后拍片后,我们对最大盂轴线、锚插入角度和与下极点的距离进行了角度比较。 结果:5点钟方向的入口比3点钟方向的入口位置更好,与盂缘的正交性更好(P < 0.05)。 结论:5点钟方向的入口比3点钟方向的入口能更好地放置锚。证据等级 II,临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.

Objective: to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.

Methods: retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.

Results: the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one. Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信