José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado
{"title":"在肩关节不稳症患者中，比较不同的锚栓置入方式。","authors":"José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\n <i>to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\n <i>retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.</i>\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\n <i>the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).</i>\n </p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.</i> <b><i>Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"32 spe1","pages":"e265443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.\",\"authors\":\"José Carlos Souza Vilela, Ivana Duval de Araújo, Mabelly Correa Albuquerque, Anna Luiza Amancio Vidal, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\\n <i>to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\\n <i>retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Results: </strong>\\n <i>the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).</i>\\n </p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.</i> <b><i>Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"32 spe1\",\"pages\":\"e265443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e265443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.
Objective: to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals.
Methods: retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole.
Results: the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one.Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.
期刊介绍：
A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
