牙科中使用的氧化亚氮吸入镇静预约和设备对环境的影响。

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A Fennell-Wells, B Duane, P Ashley, E Morgan
{"title":"牙科中使用的氧化亚氮吸入镇静预约和设备对环境的影响。","authors":"A Fennell-Wells, B Duane, P Ashley, E Morgan","doi":"10.1007/s40368-024-00895-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper reports a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to calculate the environmental footprint of a dental appointment using N<sub>2</sub>O, comparing single-use equipment with reusable equipment. Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is used successfully in dentistry to provide sedation and pain relief to anxious patients, most commonly in children. However, N<sub>2</sub>O is a powerful climate pollutant 298 times more damaging than carbon dioxide over a 100-year estimate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The functional unit chosen for this LCIA was 30 min delivery of N<sub>2</sub>O to oxygen in a 50:50 ratio at 6 L per minute flow rate as inhalation sedation to one patient. Two types of equipment were compared to deliver the anaesthetic gas: reusable and disposable items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of disposable equipment for N<sub>2</sub>O sedation produces a significantly larger environmental impact across nearly all of the environmental impact scores, but the overall global warming potential is comparable for both types of equipment due to the vast environmental pollution from N<sub>2</sub>O itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>N<sub>2</sub>O sedation is a reliable treatment adjunct but contributes to climate change. Single-use equipment has a further deleterious effect on the environment, though this is small compared to the overall impact of N<sub>2</sub>O. Dental priorities should be to deliver safe and effective care to patients that protects staff, minimises waste and mitigates impact on the environment alongside promoting research into alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environmental impact of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation appointments and equipment used in dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"A Fennell-Wells, B Duane, P Ashley, E Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-024-00895-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper reports a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to calculate the environmental footprint of a dental appointment using N<sub>2</sub>O, comparing single-use equipment with reusable equipment. Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is used successfully in dentistry to provide sedation and pain relief to anxious patients, most commonly in children. However, N<sub>2</sub>O is a powerful climate pollutant 298 times more damaging than carbon dioxide over a 100-year estimate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The functional unit chosen for this LCIA was 30 min delivery of N<sub>2</sub>O to oxygen in a 50:50 ratio at 6 L per minute flow rate as inhalation sedation to one patient. Two types of equipment were compared to deliver the anaesthetic gas: reusable and disposable items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of disposable equipment for N<sub>2</sub>O sedation produces a significantly larger environmental impact across nearly all of the environmental impact scores, but the overall global warming potential is comparable for both types of equipment due to the vast environmental pollution from N<sub>2</sub>O itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>N<sub>2</sub>O sedation is a reliable treatment adjunct but contributes to climate change. Single-use equipment has a further deleterious effect on the environment, though this is small compared to the overall impact of N<sub>2</sub>O. Dental priorities should be to deliver safe and effective care to patients that protects staff, minimises waste and mitigates impact on the environment alongside promoting research into alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00895-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00895-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文报告了一项生命周期影响评估 (LCIA),通过比较一次性设备和可重复使用设备,计算出使用一氧化二氮进行牙科诊疗的环境足迹。一氧化二氮(N2O)被成功地用于牙科,为焦虑的病人(最常见的是儿童)提供镇静和止痛效果。然而,在 100 年的估计时间内,一氧化二氮对气候的破坏是二氧化碳的 298 倍:该 LCIA 选择的功能单元是以每分钟 6 升的流速,按 50:50 的比例向一名患者输送 30 分钟的一氧化二氮和氧气,作为吸入镇静剂。比较了两种输送麻醉气体的设备:可重复使用和一次性设备:结果:在几乎所有的环境影响评分中,使用一次性设备进行一氧化二氮镇静所产生的环境影响要大得多,但由于一氧化二氮本身造成的巨大环境污染,两种设备的总体全球变暖潜势相当:结论:一氧化二氮镇静是一种可靠的辅助治疗方法,但会导致气候变化。一次性使用设备会对环境造成进一步的有害影响,尽管与一氧化二氮的总体影响相比,这种影响很小。牙科的首要任务应该是为患者提供安全有效的治疗,同时保护工作人员,尽量减少浪费,减轻对环境的影响,并促进对替代品的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The environmental impact of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation appointments and equipment used in dentistry.

Purpose: This paper reports a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to calculate the environmental footprint of a dental appointment using N2O, comparing single-use equipment with reusable equipment. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is used successfully in dentistry to provide sedation and pain relief to anxious patients, most commonly in children. However, N2O is a powerful climate pollutant 298 times more damaging than carbon dioxide over a 100-year estimate.

Methods: The functional unit chosen for this LCIA was 30 min delivery of N2O to oxygen in a 50:50 ratio at 6 L per minute flow rate as inhalation sedation to one patient. Two types of equipment were compared to deliver the anaesthetic gas: reusable and disposable items.

Results: The use of disposable equipment for N2O sedation produces a significantly larger environmental impact across nearly all of the environmental impact scores, but the overall global warming potential is comparable for both types of equipment due to the vast environmental pollution from N2O itself.

Conclusion: N2O sedation is a reliable treatment adjunct but contributes to climate change. Single-use equipment has a further deleterious effect on the environment, though this is small compared to the overall impact of N2O. Dental priorities should be to deliver safe and effective care to patients that protects staff, minimises waste and mitigates impact on the environment alongside promoting research into alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信