在围手术期温度突然升高时,皮肤电导率藻类计数器并不可靠。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-04-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0106
Ulf E Kongsgaard, Robin Johansen Menchini, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Knut Erling Juul-Hansen
{"title":"在围手术期温度突然升高时,皮肤电导率藻类计数器并不可靠。","authors":"Ulf E Kongsgaard, Robin Johansen Menchini, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Knut Erling Juul-Hansen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain assessment in anesthetized and non-communicative patients remains a challenge. Clinical signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweat and tears, have a low specificity for pain and should therefore ideally be replaced by more specific monitoring techniques. Skin conductance variability has been demonstrated to establish a patients' sensitivity to pain, but may be influenced by temperature changes that leads to profuse sweating. The aim of this pilot study was to test skin conductance changes during sudden temperature changes due to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perfusation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) in ten consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Results from the SCA was compared to other standard physiological variables at seven time points during the surgical procedure, in particular during the period with hyperthermic intraabdominal perfusion leading to an increase in the patients core temperature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine out of ten patients had an increase in the SCA measurements during the HIPEC phase correlating the increase in temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCA is unreliable to detect increased pain sensation during sudden perioperative temperature changes in adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin conductance algesimeter is unreliable during sudden perioperative temperature increases.\",\"authors\":\"Ulf E Kongsgaard, Robin Johansen Menchini, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Knut Erling Juul-Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain assessment in anesthetized and non-communicative patients remains a challenge. Clinical signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweat and tears, have a low specificity for pain and should therefore ideally be replaced by more specific monitoring techniques. Skin conductance variability has been demonstrated to establish a patients' sensitivity to pain, but may be influenced by temperature changes that leads to profuse sweating. The aim of this pilot study was to test skin conductance changes during sudden temperature changes due to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perfusation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) in ten consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Results from the SCA was compared to other standard physiological variables at seven time points during the surgical procedure, in particular during the period with hyperthermic intraabdominal perfusion leading to an increase in the patients core temperature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine out of ten patients had an increase in the SCA measurements during the HIPEC phase correlating the increase in temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCA is unreliable to detect increased pain sensation during sudden perioperative temperature changes in adult patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对麻醉和不善交流的病人进行疼痛评估仍然是一项挑战。心动过速、高血压、出汗和流泪等临床体征对疼痛的特异性较低,因此最好用更具针对性的监测技术来取代。皮肤传导变异性已被证明可以确定患者对疼痛的敏感性,但可能会受到温度变化的影响,从而导致大量出汗。本试验研究的目的是测试腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)导致温度骤变时的皮肤电导变化:方法:我们对连续接受细胞再生手术和 HIPEC 的十名患者进行了皮肤电导率测定(SCA)。在手术过程中的七个时间点,特别是在腹腔内热灌注导致患者核心温度升高期间,我们将皮肤电导率仪的结果与其他标准生理变量进行了比较:结果:10 位患者中有 9 位在 HIPEC 阶段的 SCA 测量值与体温升高相关:结论:在成年患者围手术期体温突然变化时,SCA 无法可靠地检测出疼痛感的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skin conductance algesimeter is unreliable during sudden perioperative temperature increases.

Objectives: Pain assessment in anesthetized and non-communicative patients remains a challenge. Clinical signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweat and tears, have a low specificity for pain and should therefore ideally be replaced by more specific monitoring techniques. Skin conductance variability has been demonstrated to establish a patients' sensitivity to pain, but may be influenced by temperature changes that leads to profuse sweating. The aim of this pilot study was to test skin conductance changes during sudden temperature changes due to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perfusation.

Methods: We investigated skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) in ten consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Results from the SCA was compared to other standard physiological variables at seven time points during the surgical procedure, in particular during the period with hyperthermic intraabdominal perfusion leading to an increase in the patients core temperature.

Results: Nine out of ten patients had an increase in the SCA measurements during the HIPEC phase correlating the increase in temperature.

Conclusion: SCA is unreliable to detect increased pain sensation during sudden perioperative temperature changes in adult patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信