双腔主动脉瓣患者冠状动脉疾病的患病率:文献综述。

Q3 Medicine
AORTA Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785190
Onur B Dolmaci, Tijmen L Hilhorst, Arjan Malekzadeh, Bart J A Mertens, Robert J M Klautz, Robert E Poelmann, Nimrat Grewal
{"title":"双腔主动脉瓣患者冠状动脉疾病的患病率:文献综述。","authors":"Onur B Dolmaci, Tijmen L Hilhorst, Arjan Malekzadeh, Bart J A Mertens, Robert J M Klautz, Robert E Poelmann, Nimrat Grewal","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients is a debatable topic. Several studies have indicated that BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD compared with patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), but the effects of age and gender have not always been considered. This systematic review provides an overview of articles which report on CAD in BAV and TAV patients. Searches were executed in April 2021 and January 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines in three online databases: Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction was done by two investigators separately. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between BAV and TAV patients; a fixed effects model was used for correcting on confounders. Literature search yielded 1,529 articles with 44 being eligible for inclusion. BAV patients were younger (56.4 ± 8.3 years) than TAV patients (64 ± 10.3 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). All CAD risk factors and CAD were more prevalent in TAV patients. No significant difference remained after correcting for age and gender as confounders. BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD and CAD risk factors compared with TAV patients. However, when the age differences between both groups are considered in the analyses, a similar prevalence of both CAD and CAD risk factors is found.</p>","PeriodicalId":52392,"journal":{"name":"AORTA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: An Overview of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Onur B Dolmaci, Tijmen L Hilhorst, Arjan Malekzadeh, Bart J A Mertens, Robert J M Klautz, Robert E Poelmann, Nimrat Grewal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1785190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients is a debatable topic. Several studies have indicated that BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD compared with patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), but the effects of age and gender have not always been considered. This systematic review provides an overview of articles which report on CAD in BAV and TAV patients. Searches were executed in April 2021 and January 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines in three online databases: Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction was done by two investigators separately. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between BAV and TAV patients; a fixed effects model was used for correcting on confounders. Literature search yielded 1,529 articles with 44 being eligible for inclusion. BAV patients were younger (56.4 ± 8.3 years) than TAV patients (64 ± 10.3 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). All CAD risk factors and CAD were more prevalent in TAV patients. No significant difference remained after correcting for age and gender as confounders. BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD and CAD risk factors compared with TAV patients. However, when the age differences between both groups are considered in the analyses, a similar prevalence of both CAD and CAD risk factors is found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AORTA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AORTA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AORTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的发病率是一个有争议的话题。多项研究表明,与三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)患者相比,二尖瓣主动脉瓣患者的冠状动脉疾病发病率较低,但年龄和性别的影响并未得到充分考虑。本系统性综述概述了有关 BAV 和 TAV 患者的 CAD 报告。2021 年 4 月和 2022 年 1 月,根据 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)指南在三个在线数据库中进行了检索:Medline、Embase 和 Scopus。筛选和数据提取由两名研究人员分别完成。对BAV和TAV患者的主要和次要结果进行比较;采用固定效应模型对混杂因素进行校正。文献检索共获得 1,529 篇文章,其中 44 篇符合纳入条件。BAV 患者(56.4 ± 8.3 岁)比 TAV 患者(64 ± 10.3 岁,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: An Overview of the Literature.

The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients is a debatable topic. Several studies have indicated that BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD compared with patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), but the effects of age and gender have not always been considered. This systematic review provides an overview of articles which report on CAD in BAV and TAV patients. Searches were executed in April 2021 and January 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines in three online databases: Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction was done by two investigators separately. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between BAV and TAV patients; a fixed effects model was used for correcting on confounders. Literature search yielded 1,529 articles with 44 being eligible for inclusion. BAV patients were younger (56.4 ± 8.3 years) than TAV patients (64 ± 10.3 years, p < 0.001). All CAD risk factors and CAD were more prevalent in TAV patients. No significant difference remained after correcting for age and gender as confounders. BAV patients have a lower prevalence of CAD and CAD risk factors compared with TAV patients. However, when the age differences between both groups are considered in the analyses, a similar prevalence of both CAD and CAD risk factors is found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AORTA
AORTA Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信