健康志愿者在空腹和进食条件下服用两种不同泊沙康唑 100 毫克耐胃酸片剂的单剂量交叉生物利用度比较研究

Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.36519/idcm.2023.277
Nilden Dayan, Elif Oğralı, Cihan Kirişçioğlu, Udaya Kumar Dude, Recep Erşahin
{"title":"健康志愿者在空腹和进食条件下服用两种不同泊沙康唑 100 毫克耐胃酸片剂的单剂量交叉生物利用度比较研究","authors":"Nilden Dayan, Elif Oğralı, Cihan Kirişçioğlu, Udaya Kumar Dude, Recep Erşahin","doi":"10.36519/idcm.2023.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC<sub>0-T</sub>] and from time zero to infinity [AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil<sup>®</sup> is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil<sup>®</sup>. The generic Posagil<sup>®</sup> seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil<sup>®</sup> in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil<sup>®</sup> may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":519881,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","volume":"5 4","pages":"341-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Nilden Dayan, Elif Oğralı, Cihan Kirişçioğlu, Udaya Kumar Dude, Recep Erşahin\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/idcm.2023.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC<sub>0-T</sub>] and from time zero to infinity [AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil<sup>®</sup> is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil<sup>®</sup>. The generic Posagil<sup>®</sup> seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil<sup>®</sup> in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil<sup>®</sup> may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"341-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的材料与方法:健康志愿者被随机分配接受试验产品(Posagil® 100 毫克耐胃酸片剂)或参照产品(Noxafil® 100 毫克耐胃酸片剂),参加这项单中心、随机、四期(第 1、15、29 和 43 天)、四序交叉的生物利用度比较研究。该研究记录了泊沙康唑血浆浓度和相关药代动力学特征(从时间 0 到最后观察到的可定量血浆浓度[AUC0-T]和从时间 0 到无穷大[AUC0-∞]的最大观察血浆浓度[Cmax])的数据,以便根据生物等效性(T-空腹 vs. R-空腹和 T-进食 vs. R-进食)评估试验产品与参比产品在空腹和进食条件下的疗效。R-空腹和T-进食与R-进食)和食物效应(T-空腹与T-进食和R-进食与R-进食)评估。安全性通过评估不良事件(AEs)、标准实验室评估和生命体征进行评价:喂食条件下符合生物等效性标准(T-喂食与 R-喂食:泊沙康唑的 Cmax、AUC0-T 和 AUC0-∞ 的几何 LSMean 比率分别为 97.41%、97.45% 和 97.08%;均在 80% 至 125% 的范围内),但空腹条件下不符合生物等效性标准。食物对参比产品有影响(R-进食与 R-空腹:泊沙康唑的 Cmax、AUC0-T 和 AUC0-∞ 的几何 LSMean 比率分别为 145.32%、138.84% 和 138.46%),但对试验产品没有影响。未发现安全性问题:我们的研究结果表明,Posagil® 的药代动力学特征与 Noxafil® 的药代动力学特征相似。仿制药 Posagil® 在进食和空腹状态下似乎具有类似的高生物利用度,空腹状态下的泊沙康唑暴露量高于原药 Noxafil®。因此,Posagil® 可被视为一种高附加值的非专利产品,无论是否同时摄入高脂肪膳食,它都能在空腹和进食状态下提供足够的泊沙康唑暴露量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.

Materials and methods: Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC0-T] and from time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.

Results: The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil® is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil®. The generic Posagil® seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil® in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil® may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信