{"title":"健康志愿者在空腹和进食条件下服用两种不同泊沙康唑 100 毫克耐胃酸片剂的单剂量交叉生物利用度比较研究","authors":"Nilden Dayan, Elif Oğralı, Cihan Kirişçioğlu, Udaya Kumar Dude, Recep Erşahin","doi":"10.36519/idcm.2023.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC<sub>0-T</sub>] and from time zero to infinity [AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil<sup>®</sup> is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil<sup>®</sup>. The generic Posagil<sup>®</sup> seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil<sup>®</sup> in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil<sup>®</sup> may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":519881,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","volume":"5 4","pages":"341-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Nilden Dayan, Elif Oğralı, Cihan Kirişçioğlu, Udaya Kumar Dude, Recep Erşahin\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/idcm.2023.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil<sup>®</sup> 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC<sub>0-T</sub>] and from time zero to infinity [AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-T</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil<sup>®</sup> is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil<sup>®</sup>. The generic Posagil<sup>®</sup> seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil<sup>®</sup> in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil<sup>®</sup> may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"341-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation.
Materials and methods: Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC0-T] and from time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs.
Results: The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil® is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil®. The generic Posagil® seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil® in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil® may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.