对使用另一种氟嘧啶类药物后出现心脏毒性并改用 S-1 治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者进行详细分析(CardioSwitch 研究的亚组分析)。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sampsa Kinos, Helga Hagman, Päivi Halonen, Leena-Maija Soveri, Mary O'Reilly, Per Pfeiffer, Jan-Erik Frödin, Halfdan Sorbye, Eetu Heervä, Gabor Liposits, Raija Kallio, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Tapio Salminen, Maarit Bärlund, Carl-Henrik Shah, Ray McDermott, Rebecka Röckert, Petra Flygare, Johannes Kwakman, Arco Teske, Cornelis Punt, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Österlund
{"title":"对使用另一种氟嘧啶类药物后出现心脏毒性并改用 S-1 治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者进行详细分析(CardioSwitch 研究的亚组分析)。","authors":"Sampsa Kinos, Helga Hagman, Päivi Halonen, Leena-Maija Soveri, Mary O'Reilly, Per Pfeiffer, Jan-Erik Frödin, Halfdan Sorbye, Eetu Heervä, Gabor Liposits, Raija Kallio, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Tapio Salminen, Maarit Bärlund, Carl-Henrik Shah, Ray McDermott, Rebecka Röckert, Petra Flygare, Johannes Kwakman, Arco Teske, Cornelis Punt, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Österlund","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"248-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study).\",\"authors\":\"Sampsa Kinos, Helga Hagman, Päivi Halonen, Leena-Maija Soveri, Mary O'Reilly, Per Pfeiffer, Jan-Erik Frödin, Halfdan Sorbye, Eetu Heervä, Gabor Liposits, Raija Kallio, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Tapio Salminen, Maarit Bärlund, Carl-Henrik Shah, Ray McDermott, Rebecka Röckert, Petra Flygare, Johannes Kwakman, Arco Teske, Cornelis Punt, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Österlund\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"248-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:CardioSwitch-研究表明,接受卡培他滨或5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)治疗后出现心脏毒性的实体瘤患者可以安全地改用S-1(一种替代性氟嘧啶(FP))。鉴于欧洲药品管理局已批准 S-1 用于转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)治疗,本分析提供了更详细的安全性和疗效信息,以及原始研究中 mCRC 患者的转移灶切除术和/或局部消融治疗(LAT)相关数据:这项回顾性队列研究在 12 个欧洲中心进行。主要终点是换药后心脏毒性的复发。本分析报告了 CardioSwitch 队列中 78 名 mCRC 患者(N = 200)的安全性数据。66 名 mCRC 患者的详细疗效和结果数据已公布:S-1在mCRC患者中的安全性数据与最初的CardioSwitch队列和基于FP的治疗的预期数据相似,没有新的问题。4/78(5%)名mCRC患者在接受S-1治疗后出现了复发性心脏毒性(均为1级);所有患者都能完成FP治疗。自开始接受S-1治疗起,中位无进展生存期为9.0个月,中位总生存期为26.7个月。33/66(50%)例患者接受了转移灶切除术和/或LAT,S-1成功用于推荐的新辅助/转换或类似辅助的联合方案,其时间安排与标准FP相同:当mCRC患者因心脏毒性而被迫停用5-FU或卡培他滨时,S-1是一种安全有效的FP替代方案,可安全地用于推荐的标准方案、设置和计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study).

Background and purpose: The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients.

Results: Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs.

Interpretation: S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信