利用药物警戒中的单个病例安全性报告(READUS-PV)进行药物安全性信号检测的比例失调分析报告:解释与说明。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s40264-024-01423-7
Michele Fusaroli, Francesco Salvo, Bernard Begaud, Thamir M AlShammari, Andrew Bate, Vera Battini, Andreas Brueckner, Gianmario Candore, Carla Carnovale, Salvatore Crisafulli, Paola Maria Cutroneo, Charles Dolladille, Milou-Daniel Drici, Jean-Luc Faillie, Adam Goldman, Manfred Hauben, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, Olivia Mahaux, Katrin Manlik, François Montastruc, Yoshihiro Noguchi, G Niklas Norén, Roberta Noseda, Igho J Onakpoya, Antoine Pariente, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Myriam Salem, Daniele Sartori, Nhung T H Trinh, Marco Tuccori, Florence van Hunsel, Eugène van Puijenbroek, Emanuel Raschi, Charles Khouri
{"title":"利用药物警戒中的单个病例安全性报告(READUS-PV)进行药物安全性信号检测的比例失调分析报告:解释与说明。","authors":"Michele Fusaroli, Francesco Salvo, Bernard Begaud, Thamir M AlShammari, Andrew Bate, Vera Battini, Andreas Brueckner, Gianmario Candore, Carla Carnovale, Salvatore Crisafulli, Paola Maria Cutroneo, Charles Dolladille, Milou-Daniel Drici, Jean-Luc Faillie, Adam Goldman, Manfred Hauben, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, Olivia Mahaux, Katrin Manlik, François Montastruc, Yoshihiro Noguchi, G Niklas Norén, Roberta Noseda, Igho J Onakpoya, Antoine Pariente, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Myriam Salem, Daniele Sartori, Nhung T H Trinh, Marco Tuccori, Florence van Hunsel, Eugène van Puijenbroek, Emanuel Raschi, Charles Khouri","doi":"10.1007/s40264-024-01423-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses based on individual case safety reports are widely used to detect safety signals. Unfortunately, publishing disproportionality analyses lacks specific guidelines, often leading to incomplete and ambiguous reporting, and carries the risk of incorrect conclusions when data are not placed in the correct context. The REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV) statement was developed to address this issue by promoting transparent and comprehensive reporting of disproportionality studies. While the statement paper explains in greater detail the procedure followed to develop these guidelines, with this explanation paper we present the 14 items retained for READUS-PV guidelines, together with an in-depth explanation of their rationale and bullet points to illustrate their practical implementation. Our primary objective is to foster the adoption of the READUS-PV guidelines among authors, editors, peer reviewers, and readers of disproportionality analyses. Enhancing transparency, completeness, and accuracy of reporting, as well as proper interpretation of their results, READUS-PV guidelines will ultimately facilitate evidence-based decision making in pharmacovigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"585-599"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The REporting of A Disproportionality Analysis for DrUg Safety Signal Detection Using Individual Case Safety Reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV): Explanation and Elaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Fusaroli, Francesco Salvo, Bernard Begaud, Thamir M AlShammari, Andrew Bate, Vera Battini, Andreas Brueckner, Gianmario Candore, Carla Carnovale, Salvatore Crisafulli, Paola Maria Cutroneo, Charles Dolladille, Milou-Daniel Drici, Jean-Luc Faillie, Adam Goldman, Manfred Hauben, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, Olivia Mahaux, Katrin Manlik, François Montastruc, Yoshihiro Noguchi, G Niklas Norén, Roberta Noseda, Igho J Onakpoya, Antoine Pariente, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Myriam Salem, Daniele Sartori, Nhung T H Trinh, Marco Tuccori, Florence van Hunsel, Eugène van Puijenbroek, Emanuel Raschi, Charles Khouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40264-024-01423-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses based on individual case safety reports are widely used to detect safety signals. Unfortunately, publishing disproportionality analyses lacks specific guidelines, often leading to incomplete and ambiguous reporting, and carries the risk of incorrect conclusions when data are not placed in the correct context. The REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV) statement was developed to address this issue by promoting transparent and comprehensive reporting of disproportionality studies. While the statement paper explains in greater detail the procedure followed to develop these guidelines, with this explanation paper we present the 14 items retained for READUS-PV guidelines, together with an in-depth explanation of their rationale and bullet points to illustrate their practical implementation. Our primary objective is to foster the adoption of the READUS-PV guidelines among authors, editors, peer reviewers, and readers of disproportionality analyses. Enhancing transparency, completeness, and accuracy of reporting, as well as proper interpretation of their results, READUS-PV guidelines will ultimately facilitate evidence-based decision making in pharmacovigilance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"585-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01423-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01423-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在药物警戒中,基于单个病例安全性报告的比例失调分析被广泛用于检测安全性信号。遗憾的是,发布比例失调分析报告缺乏具体的指导原则,常常导致报告不完整和含糊不清,而且如果不将数据置于正确的背景下,还有可能得出不正确的结论。为了解决这一问题,我们制定了《利用药物警戒中的单个病例安全性报告进行药物安全信号检测的比例失调分析报告》(READUS-PV)声明,以促进对比例失调研究进行透明、全面的报告。声明文件更详细地解释了制定这些指南所遵循的程序,而本说明文件则介绍了 READUS-PV 指南所保留的 14 个项目,并深入解释了其理由和要点,以说明其实际执行情况。我们的主要目的是促进作者、编辑、同行评审员和比例失调分析的读者采用 READUS-PV 指南。READUS-PV 指南将提高报告的透明度、完整性和准确性,并正确解释其结果,最终促进药物警戒领域的循证决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The REporting of A Disproportionality Analysis for DrUg Safety Signal Detection Using Individual Case Safety Reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV): Explanation and Elaboration.

In pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses based on individual case safety reports are widely used to detect safety signals. Unfortunately, publishing disproportionality analyses lacks specific guidelines, often leading to incomplete and ambiguous reporting, and carries the risk of incorrect conclusions when data are not placed in the correct context. The REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV) statement was developed to address this issue by promoting transparent and comprehensive reporting of disproportionality studies. While the statement paper explains in greater detail the procedure followed to develop these guidelines, with this explanation paper we present the 14 items retained for READUS-PV guidelines, together with an in-depth explanation of their rationale and bullet points to illustrate their practical implementation. Our primary objective is to foster the adoption of the READUS-PV guidelines among authors, editors, peer reviewers, and readers of disproportionality analyses. Enhancing transparency, completeness, and accuracy of reporting, as well as proper interpretation of their results, READUS-PV guidelines will ultimately facilitate evidence-based decision making in pharmacovigilance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信