单弧度设计对全膝关节置换术后上下楼梯时体内运动学的影响

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Kenichi Kono, Takaharu Yamazaki, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Sakae Tanaka, Tetsuya Tomita
{"title":"单弧度设计对全膝关节置换术后上下楼梯时体内运动学的影响","authors":"Kenichi Kono, Takaharu Yamazaki, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Sakae Tanaka, Tetsuya Tomita","doi":"10.1177/10225536241246326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe single-radius design is one of the major total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and widely used all over the world. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the anteroposterior (AP) single-radius design with mediolateral (ML) single-radius (Non Restricted Geometry; NRG) and ML dual-radius (Triathlon) during stair activities.MethodsA total of 21 knees in 18 patients (NRG group: 10 knees in 7 patients, Triathlon group: 11 knees in 11 patients) with a clinically successful posterior stabilized TKA were examined. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient performed stair ascending and descending motions. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique. The knee flexion angle, rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, AP translation of the femorotibial contact point for both the medial and lateral sides of the knee, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in rotation angle and AP translation at each flexion angle. Examining the varus-valgus angle, the NRG group showed varus position at an early flexion angle during both stair activities. Post-cam engagement was observed in both groups during both stair activities. The mean flexion angle of engagement in the NRG group, the post of which was located anterior to the Triathlon, was larger than that in the Triathlon group during both stair activities.ConclusionDespite the same AP single-radius TKA, ML single-radius might affect varus motion at an early flexion angle.","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of single-radius design on in vivo kinematics during stair activities after total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Kenichi Kono, Takaharu Yamazaki, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Sakae Tanaka, Tetsuya Tomita\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536241246326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe single-radius design is one of the major total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and widely used all over the world. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the anteroposterior (AP) single-radius design with mediolateral (ML) single-radius (Non Restricted Geometry; NRG) and ML dual-radius (Triathlon) during stair activities.MethodsA total of 21 knees in 18 patients (NRG group: 10 knees in 7 patients, Triathlon group: 11 knees in 11 patients) with a clinically successful posterior stabilized TKA were examined. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient performed stair ascending and descending motions. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique. The knee flexion angle, rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, AP translation of the femorotibial contact point for both the medial and lateral sides of the knee, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in rotation angle and AP translation at each flexion angle. Examining the varus-valgus angle, the NRG group showed varus position at an early flexion angle during both stair activities. Post-cam engagement was observed in both groups during both stair activities. The mean flexion angle of engagement in the NRG group, the post of which was located anterior to the Triathlon, was larger than that in the Triathlon group during both stair activities.ConclusionDespite the same AP single-radius TKA, ML single-radius might affect varus motion at an early flexion angle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241246326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241246326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景单弧度设计是全世界广泛使用的主要全膝关节置换术(TKA)设计之一。本研究的目的是比较前后(AP)单桡设计与内外侧(ML)单桡设计(非受限几何;NRG)和ML双桡设计(Triathlon)在楼梯活动中的活体运动学特性。方法共检查了18名临床成功的后稳定TKA患者的21个膝关节(NRG组:7名患者的10个膝关节;Triathlon组:11名患者的11个膝关节)。在透视监视下,每位患者都做了阶梯上升和下降运动。使用二维/三维配准技术分析了活体运动学。结果两组患者在每个屈曲角度下的旋转角度和AP平移均无显著差异。在检查膝关节屈曲-外翻角度时,NRG 组在两次上楼梯活动中都显示出屈曲角度较早时的膝关节外翻位置。在两种楼梯活动中,两组均观察到凸轮后啮合。结论尽管采用相同的 AP 单弧度 TKA,但 ML 单弧度可能会影响早期屈曲角的屈曲运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of single-radius design on in vivo kinematics during stair activities after total knee arthroplasty
BackgroundThe single-radius design is one of the major total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and widely used all over the world. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the anteroposterior (AP) single-radius design with mediolateral (ML) single-radius (Non Restricted Geometry; NRG) and ML dual-radius (Triathlon) during stair activities.MethodsA total of 21 knees in 18 patients (NRG group: 10 knees in 7 patients, Triathlon group: 11 knees in 11 patients) with a clinically successful posterior stabilized TKA were examined. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient performed stair ascending and descending motions. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique. The knee flexion angle, rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, AP translation of the femorotibial contact point for both the medial and lateral sides of the knee, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in rotation angle and AP translation at each flexion angle. Examining the varus-valgus angle, the NRG group showed varus position at an early flexion angle during both stair activities. Post-cam engagement was observed in both groups during both stair activities. The mean flexion angle of engagement in the NRG group, the post of which was located anterior to the Triathlon, was larger than that in the Triathlon group during both stair activities.ConclusionDespite the same AP single-radius TKA, ML single-radius might affect varus motion at an early flexion angle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信