无腓骨皮瓣重建、肿瘤治疗和牙齿移植的最佳治疗顺序:系统回顾与元分析》。

Shreya Sriram, Moreen W Njoroge, Christopher D Lopez, Lily Zhu, Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Cynthia T Yusuf, Robin Yang
{"title":"无腓骨皮瓣重建、肿瘤治疗和牙齿移植的最佳治疗顺序:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Shreya Sriram, Moreen W Njoroge, Christopher D Lopez, Lily Zhu, Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Cynthia T Yusuf, Robin Yang","doi":"10.1097/scs.0000000000010127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P=0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P=0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P<0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P=0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Treatment Order With Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction, Oncologic Treatment, and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shreya Sriram, Moreen W Njoroge, Christopher D Lopez, Lily Zhu, Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Cynthia T Yusuf, Robin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/scs.0000000000010127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P=0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P=0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P<0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P=0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头颈部癌症(HNC)患者从颅面重建中获益良多,但对于康复时机却没有明确的指导。本荟萃分析旨在阐明肿瘤治疗顺序对植入物存活率的影响。本文还提出了一种指导植入顺序的算法。我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 上检索了关于 HNC 患者消融和无腓骨瓣(FFF)重建手术及放疗(RTX)的研究。主要结果包括治疗顺序、植入物存活率和 RTX 剂量。在 661 项研究中,纳入了 20 项研究(617 个植入体,199 名患者)。接受>60 Gy RTX的植入体的总存活率明显低于接受<60 Gy的植入体(82.8%对90.1%,P=0.035)。RTX完成后1年再植入,植入物的存活率有所提高(96.8%对82.5%,P=0.001)。植入前接受 RTX 的种植体在 RTX 消融后的存活率比消融前更高(91.2% 对 74.8%,P<0.001)。177颗种植体仅植入FFF,其存活率高于植入FFF或原生骨的种植体(90.4%对83.5%,P=0.035)。如果放疗过早、剂量过大且在肿瘤切除前进行,则会对种植体的存活率造成损害。该研究提出了一种新的循证临床决策算法,用于确定 HNC 患者的最佳治疗顺序。牙科修复体的总体存活率是可以接受的,这再次证明了修复体在HNC患者康复中的关键作用。必须考虑 RTX 的剂量、时机和植入位置,以优化存活率和患者的治疗效果,从而提高功能性、美观度和舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Treatment Order With Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction, Oncologic Treatment, and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P=0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P=0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P<0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P=0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信