Giulio Falasconi, Diego Penela, David Soto-Iglesias, Pietro Francia, Andrea Saglietto, Dario Turturiello, Daniel Viveros, Aldo Bellido, Jose Alderete, Fatima Zaraket, Paula Franco-Ocaña, Marina Huguet, Óscar Cámara, Radu Vătășescu, José-Tomás Ortiz-Pérez, Julio Martí-Almor, Antonio Berruezo
{"title":"以左心房壁厚度为导向,使用超高功率短时病变进行个性化肺静脉隔离:QDOT-by-LAWT 随机试验","authors":"Giulio Falasconi, Diego Penela, David Soto-Iglesias, Pietro Francia, Andrea Saglietto, Dario Turturiello, Daniel Viveros, Aldo Bellido, Jose Alderete, Fatima Zaraket, Paula Franco-Ocaña, Marina Huguet, Óscar Cámara, Radu Vătășescu, José-Tomás Ortiz-Pérez, Julio Martí-Almor, Antonio Berruezo","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation proved to be safe and effective. However, vHPSD applications result in shallower lesions that might not be always transmural. Multidetector computed tomography-derived left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) maps could enable a thickness-guided switching from vHPSD to the standard-power ablation mode. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the safety, the efficacy, and the efficiency of a LAWT-guided vHPSD PVI approach with those of the CLOSE protocol for PAF ablation (NCT04298177). Methods and results Consecutive patients referred for first-time PAF ablation were randomized on a 1:1 basis. In the QDOT-by-LAWT arm, for LAWT ≤2.5 mm, vHPSD ablation was performed; for points with LAWT > 2.5 mm, standard-power RF ablation titrating ablation index (AI) according to the local LAWT was performed. In the CLOSE arm, LAWT information was not available to the operator; ablation was performed according to the CLOSE study settings: AI ≥400 at the posterior wall and ≥550 at the anterior wall. A total of 162 patients were included. In the QDOT-by-LAWT group, a significant reduction in procedure time (40 vs. 70 min; P < 0.001) and RF time (6.6 vs. 25.7 min; P < 0.001) was observed. No difference was observed between the groups regarding complication rate (P = 0.99) and first-pass isolation (P = 0.99). At 12-month follow-up, no significant differences occurred in atrial arrhythmia-free survival between groups (P = 0.88). Conclusion LAWT-guided PVI combining vHPSD and standard-power ablation is not inferior to the CLOSE protocol in terms of 1-year atrial arrhythmia-free survival and demonstrated a reduction in procedural and RF times.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized pulmonary vein isolation with very high-power short-duration lesions guided by left atrial wall thickness: the QDOT-by-LAWT randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Falasconi, Diego Penela, David Soto-Iglesias, Pietro Francia, Andrea Saglietto, Dario Turturiello, Daniel Viveros, Aldo Bellido, Jose Alderete, Fatima Zaraket, Paula Franco-Ocaña, Marina Huguet, Óscar Cámara, Radu Vătășescu, José-Tomás Ortiz-Pérez, Julio Martí-Almor, Antonio Berruezo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euae087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation proved to be safe and effective. However, vHPSD applications result in shallower lesions that might not be always transmural. Multidetector computed tomography-derived left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) maps could enable a thickness-guided switching from vHPSD to the standard-power ablation mode. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the safety, the efficacy, and the efficiency of a LAWT-guided vHPSD PVI approach with those of the CLOSE protocol for PAF ablation (NCT04298177). Methods and results Consecutive patients referred for first-time PAF ablation were randomized on a 1:1 basis. In the QDOT-by-LAWT arm, for LAWT ≤2.5 mm, vHPSD ablation was performed; for points with LAWT > 2.5 mm, standard-power RF ablation titrating ablation index (AI) according to the local LAWT was performed. In the CLOSE arm, LAWT information was not available to the operator; ablation was performed according to the CLOSE study settings: AI ≥400 at the posterior wall and ≥550 at the anterior wall. A total of 162 patients were included. In the QDOT-by-LAWT group, a significant reduction in procedure time (40 vs. 70 min; P < 0.001) and RF time (6.6 vs. 25.7 min; P < 0.001) was observed. No difference was observed between the groups regarding complication rate (P = 0.99) and first-pass isolation (P = 0.99). At 12-month follow-up, no significant differences occurred in atrial arrhythmia-free survival between groups (P = 0.88). Conclusion LAWT-guided PVI combining vHPSD and standard-power ablation is not inferior to the CLOSE protocol in terms of 1-year atrial arrhythmia-free survival and demonstrated a reduction in procedural and RF times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 使用超高功率短持续时间(vHPSD)射频(RF)消融术进行阵发性心房颤动(PAF)的肺静脉隔离(PVI)被证明是安全有效的。然而,vHPSD 应用导致病灶较浅,不一定总是透壁的。多载体计算机断层扫描得出的左心房壁厚度(LAWT)图可以实现在厚度引导下从 vHPSD 到标准功率消融模式的转换。本随机试验的目的是比较 LAWT 引导的 vHPSD PVI 方法与 PAF 消融 CLOSE 方案(NCT04298177)的安全性、有效性和效率。方法和结果 首次接受 PAF 消融术的连续转诊患者按 1:1 随机分配。在QDOT-by-LAWT臂中,对于LAWT≤2.5毫米的点,进行vHPSD消融;对于LAWT> 2.5毫米的点,进行标准功率射频消融,根据局部LAWT滴定消融指数(AI)。在 CLOSE 研究组中,操作者无法获得 LAWT 信息;消融根据 CLOSE 研究设置进行:后壁 AI ≥400,前壁 AI ≥550。共纳入了 162 名患者。在 QDOT-by-LAWT 组中,观察到手术时间(40 分钟对 70 分钟;Pamp &;lt;0.001)和射频时间(6.6 分钟对 25.7 分钟;Pamp &;lt;0.001)显著缩短。两组在并发症发生率(P = 0.99)和首次分离率(P = 0.99)方面没有差异。在 12 个月的随访中,各组间无房性心律失常存活率无明显差异(P = 0.88)。结论 LAWT 引导的 PVI 结合了 vHPSD 和标准功率消融术,在 1 年无房性心律失常存活率方面并不逊色于 CLOSE 方案,而且减少了手术时间和射频时间。
Personalized pulmonary vein isolation with very high-power short-duration lesions guided by left atrial wall thickness: the QDOT-by-LAWT randomized trial
Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation proved to be safe and effective. However, vHPSD applications result in shallower lesions that might not be always transmural. Multidetector computed tomography-derived left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) maps could enable a thickness-guided switching from vHPSD to the standard-power ablation mode. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the safety, the efficacy, and the efficiency of a LAWT-guided vHPSD PVI approach with those of the CLOSE protocol for PAF ablation (NCT04298177). Methods and results Consecutive patients referred for first-time PAF ablation were randomized on a 1:1 basis. In the QDOT-by-LAWT arm, for LAWT ≤2.5 mm, vHPSD ablation was performed; for points with LAWT > 2.5 mm, standard-power RF ablation titrating ablation index (AI) according to the local LAWT was performed. In the CLOSE arm, LAWT information was not available to the operator; ablation was performed according to the CLOSE study settings: AI ≥400 at the posterior wall and ≥550 at the anterior wall. A total of 162 patients were included. In the QDOT-by-LAWT group, a significant reduction in procedure time (40 vs. 70 min; P < 0.001) and RF time (6.6 vs. 25.7 min; P < 0.001) was observed. No difference was observed between the groups regarding complication rate (P = 0.99) and first-pass isolation (P = 0.99). At 12-month follow-up, no significant differences occurred in atrial arrhythmia-free survival between groups (P = 0.88). Conclusion LAWT-guided PVI combining vHPSD and standard-power ablation is not inferior to the CLOSE protocol in terms of 1-year atrial arrhythmia-free survival and demonstrated a reduction in procedural and RF times.