不同冲泡方法冲泡的阿拉比卡咖啡的生物活性含量和抗氧化活性

Christian Liguori, Puspo Edi Giriwono, Dian Herawati
{"title":"不同冲泡方法冲泡的阿拉比卡咖啡的生物活性含量和抗氧化活性","authors":"Christian Liguori, Puspo Edi Giriwono, Dian Herawati","doi":"10.29244/jmpi.2024.11.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coffee contains abundant bioactive compounds related to health, among which are phenolic acids and diterpenes. This study aimed to investigate phenolic acids and diterpenes content in Arabica Gayo coffee, and its in-vitro antioxidant activities due to different brewing methods. The manual brewing methods used were tubruk (steeping), V60 drip, and hanging drip bag. The analysis conducted was determination of phenolic acid content as chlorogenic acid isomers (as 3-caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA), 4-caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA), and 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA)), diterpenes content (as cafestol and kahweol), and antioxidant activity using DPPH and FRAP method. The result showed that tubruk brew had 3-CQA, 4-CQA, and 5-CQA content of 0.38, 0.45, and 1.11 mg/mL, respectively, while V60 brew contained 0.39, 0.45, and 1.18 mg/mL, respectively. They were significantly higher than those in the drip bag, 0.25, 0.33, and 0.85 mg/mL, respectively. Cafestol and kahweol content in tubruk were significantly higher, reaching 3.03 and 7.86 mg/L consecutively, as in V60 were 0.40 and 1.02 mg/L and in drip bag were 0.46 and 0.85 mg/L. DPPH result displayed no significant difference per sample volume (918.45-921.17 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/L). FRAP result showed tubruk brew has the highest activity with 635.12 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, compared to V60 and drip bag brew at 560.91 and 551.10 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, consecutively. The results revealed that brewing methods affect the bioactive content of the final brew, in this research were phenolic acids and diterpenes. Various methods may differ in the variety and amount of other extracted bioactive compounds, so which affects the antioxidant activities of coffee brew.","PeriodicalId":405385,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality","volume":"50 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kadar Bioaktif dan Aktivitas Antioksidan Seduhan Kopi Arabika dengan Variasi Metode Penyeduhan\",\"authors\":\"Christian Liguori, Puspo Edi Giriwono, Dian Herawati\",\"doi\":\"10.29244/jmpi.2024.11.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coffee contains abundant bioactive compounds related to health, among which are phenolic acids and diterpenes. This study aimed to investigate phenolic acids and diterpenes content in Arabica Gayo coffee, and its in-vitro antioxidant activities due to different brewing methods. The manual brewing methods used were tubruk (steeping), V60 drip, and hanging drip bag. The analysis conducted was determination of phenolic acid content as chlorogenic acid isomers (as 3-caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA), 4-caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA), and 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA)), diterpenes content (as cafestol and kahweol), and antioxidant activity using DPPH and FRAP method. The result showed that tubruk brew had 3-CQA, 4-CQA, and 5-CQA content of 0.38, 0.45, and 1.11 mg/mL, respectively, while V60 brew contained 0.39, 0.45, and 1.18 mg/mL, respectively. They were significantly higher than those in the drip bag, 0.25, 0.33, and 0.85 mg/mL, respectively. Cafestol and kahweol content in tubruk were significantly higher, reaching 3.03 and 7.86 mg/L consecutively, as in V60 were 0.40 and 1.02 mg/L and in drip bag were 0.46 and 0.85 mg/L. DPPH result displayed no significant difference per sample volume (918.45-921.17 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/L). FRAP result showed tubruk brew has the highest activity with 635.12 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, compared to V60 and drip bag brew at 560.91 and 551.10 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, consecutively. The results revealed that brewing methods affect the bioactive content of the final brew, in this research were phenolic acids and diterpenes. Various methods may differ in the variety and amount of other extracted bioactive compounds, so which affects the antioxidant activities of coffee brew.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality\",\"volume\":\"50 35\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29244/jmpi.2024.11.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/jmpi.2024.11.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

咖啡中含有丰富的与健康有关的生物活性化合物,其中包括酚酸和二萜。本研究旨在调查阿拉比卡加约咖啡中的酚酸和二萜含量,以及不同冲泡方法导致的体外抗氧化活性。采用的手工冲泡方法有浸泡法(tubruk)、V60 滴滤法和悬挂滴滤袋法。所进行的分析是测定绿原酸异构体(3-咖啡酰奎宁酸(3-CQA)、4-咖啡酰奎宁酸(4-CQA)和 5-咖啡酰奎宁酸(5-CQA))中的酚酸含量、二萜含量(咖啡酚和咖啡醇)以及使用 DPPH 和 FRAP 法测定的抗氧化活性。结果显示,tubruk 啤酒中 3-CQA、4-CQA 和 5-CQA 的含量分别为 0.38、0.45 和 1.11 毫克/毫升,而 V60 啤酒中的含量分别为 0.39、0.45 和 1.18 毫克/毫升。它们分别比滴灌袋中的 0.25、0.33 和 0.85 毫克/毫升高出很多。块根中的咖啡酚和卡维醇含量明显较高,分别达到 3.03 毫克/升和 7.86 毫克/升,V60 中分别为 0.40 毫克/升和 1.02 毫克/升,滴灌袋中分别为 0.46 毫克/升和 0.85 毫克/升。DPPH 结果显示,每个样品量(918.45-921.17 毫克抗坏血酸当量/升)之间没有明显差异。FRAP 结果显示,浴缸酿造的活性最高,为 635.12 毫克没食子酸当量/升,而 V60 和滴滤袋酿造的活性分别为 560.91 毫克没食子酸当量/升和 551.10 毫克没食子酸当量/升。结果表明,酿造方法会影响最终酒的生物活性含量,在本研究中影响的是酚酸和二萜。不同方法提取的其他生物活性化合物的种类和数量可能不同,从而影响咖啡冲泡的抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kadar Bioaktif dan Aktivitas Antioksidan Seduhan Kopi Arabika dengan Variasi Metode Penyeduhan
Coffee contains abundant bioactive compounds related to health, among which are phenolic acids and diterpenes. This study aimed to investigate phenolic acids and diterpenes content in Arabica Gayo coffee, and its in-vitro antioxidant activities due to different brewing methods. The manual brewing methods used were tubruk (steeping), V60 drip, and hanging drip bag. The analysis conducted was determination of phenolic acid content as chlorogenic acid isomers (as 3-caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA), 4-caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA), and 5-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA)), diterpenes content (as cafestol and kahweol), and antioxidant activity using DPPH and FRAP method. The result showed that tubruk brew had 3-CQA, 4-CQA, and 5-CQA content of 0.38, 0.45, and 1.11 mg/mL, respectively, while V60 brew contained 0.39, 0.45, and 1.18 mg/mL, respectively. They were significantly higher than those in the drip bag, 0.25, 0.33, and 0.85 mg/mL, respectively. Cafestol and kahweol content in tubruk were significantly higher, reaching 3.03 and 7.86 mg/L consecutively, as in V60 were 0.40 and 1.02 mg/L and in drip bag were 0.46 and 0.85 mg/L. DPPH result displayed no significant difference per sample volume (918.45-921.17 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/L). FRAP result showed tubruk brew has the highest activity with 635.12 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, compared to V60 and drip bag brew at 560.91 and 551.10 mg gallic acid equivalent/L, consecutively. The results revealed that brewing methods affect the bioactive content of the final brew, in this research were phenolic acids and diterpenes. Various methods may differ in the variety and amount of other extracted bioactive compounds, so which affects the antioxidant activities of coffee brew.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信