生物陶瓷和树脂根管封闭剂细胞毒性作用的实验室比较研究

Rasha Mahfouz, Manal Abdelbaky, Mohamed Omaia
{"title":"生物陶瓷和树脂根管封闭剂细胞毒性作用的实验室比较研究","authors":"Rasha Mahfouz, Manal Abdelbaky, Mohamed Omaia","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of MTA Bioseal root canal sealer (Itena-clinical, Villepinte, France) with AH + epoxy resin-based sealer (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and ADSEAL resin sealer (Meta Biomed, Korea). Methods: In sterile test tubes, the tested sealers were consecutively diluted twice. To evaluate the proper concentration where fibroblast cells would survive, extraction media were tempered many times using cell Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) following the ISO standards. The cytotoxic effect of concentrations used in the present study (12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%) were evaluated by Methyl Thiazol Tetrazolium (MTT) essay after 24, 72 hours, and one week using a human fibroblast cell line. Statistical analysis was performed by using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: AH Plus and MTA Bioseal showed generally similar behavior. The highest cytotoxicity was recorded for both sealers at conc.100mg/ml in the first 24 hours. Afterwards the mean percentage of cell viability increased progressively with the decrease in concentration. While ADSEAL showed a nearly constant cytotoxicity that is insignificantly affected by the time factor at the four experimental concentrations used in the study. Conclusion : AH Plus had the lowest cytotoxic effect followed by MTA Bioseal. However, both sealers showed parallel behavior of decreased cytotoxicity with increasing test time period. While ADSEAL had the highest cytotoxicity with statistically insignificant effect of time intervals or concentrations.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Laboratory Comparative Study of the Cytotoxic Effect of Bioceramic and Resin Based Root Canal Sealers\",\"authors\":\"Rasha Mahfouz, Manal Abdelbaky, Mohamed Omaia\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of MTA Bioseal root canal sealer (Itena-clinical, Villepinte, France) with AH + epoxy resin-based sealer (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and ADSEAL resin sealer (Meta Biomed, Korea). Methods: In sterile test tubes, the tested sealers were consecutively diluted twice. To evaluate the proper concentration where fibroblast cells would survive, extraction media were tempered many times using cell Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) following the ISO standards. The cytotoxic effect of concentrations used in the present study (12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%) were evaluated by Methyl Thiazol Tetrazolium (MTT) essay after 24, 72 hours, and one week using a human fibroblast cell line. Statistical analysis was performed by using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: AH Plus and MTA Bioseal showed generally similar behavior. The highest cytotoxicity was recorded for both sealers at conc.100mg/ml in the first 24 hours. Afterwards the mean percentage of cell viability increased progressively with the decrease in concentration. While ADSEAL showed a nearly constant cytotoxicity that is insignificantly affected by the time factor at the four experimental concentrations used in the study. Conclusion : AH Plus had the lowest cytotoxic effect followed by MTA Bioseal. However, both sealers showed parallel behavior of decreased cytotoxicity with increasing test time period. While ADSEAL had the highest cytotoxicity with statistically insignificant effect of time intervals or concentrations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.256882.2837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估 MTA Bioseal 根管封闭剂(Itena-clinical,法国维勒班特)与 AH + 环氧树脂基封闭剂(Dentsply Sirona,德国)和 ADSEAL 树脂封闭剂(Meta Biomed,韩国)的细胞毒性作用。方法:在无菌试管中,将测试的封闭剂连续稀释两次。为了评估成纤维细胞存活的适当浓度,按照 ISO 标准使用细胞杜氏改良鹰培养基(DMEM)对提取介质进行了多次调温。本研究中使用的浓度(12.5%、25%、50% 和 100%)的细胞毒性效果是通过甲基噻唑四唑(MTT)论文在 24 小时、72 小时和一周后使用人成纤维细胞系进行评估的。采用单向方差分析进行统计分析,然后采用 Tukey`s Post Hoc 检验进行多重比较。结果AH Plus 和 MTA Bioseal 的表现基本相似。在浓度为 100 毫克/毫升时,两种密封剂在最初 24 小时内的细胞毒性最高。之后,细胞存活率的平均百分比随着浓度的降低而逐渐增加。而 ADSEAL 的细胞毒性几乎恒定,在研究中使用的四种实验浓度下,其细胞毒性受时间因素的影响不大。结论:AH Plus 的细胞毒性效果最低,其次是 MTA Bioseal。不过,这两种封闭剂的细胞毒性都随着试验时间的延长而降低。而 ADSEAL 的细胞毒性最高,但时间间隔或浓度的影响在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Laboratory Comparative Study of the Cytotoxic Effect of Bioceramic and Resin Based Root Canal Sealers
Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of MTA Bioseal root canal sealer (Itena-clinical, Villepinte, France) with AH + epoxy resin-based sealer (Dentsply Sirona, Germany) and ADSEAL resin sealer (Meta Biomed, Korea). Methods: In sterile test tubes, the tested sealers were consecutively diluted twice. To evaluate the proper concentration where fibroblast cells would survive, extraction media were tempered many times using cell Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) following the ISO standards. The cytotoxic effect of concentrations used in the present study (12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%) were evaluated by Methyl Thiazol Tetrazolium (MTT) essay after 24, 72 hours, and one week using a human fibroblast cell line. Statistical analysis was performed by using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: AH Plus and MTA Bioseal showed generally similar behavior. The highest cytotoxicity was recorded for both sealers at conc.100mg/ml in the first 24 hours. Afterwards the mean percentage of cell viability increased progressively with the decrease in concentration. While ADSEAL showed a nearly constant cytotoxicity that is insignificantly affected by the time factor at the four experimental concentrations used in the study. Conclusion : AH Plus had the lowest cytotoxic effect followed by MTA Bioseal. However, both sealers showed parallel behavior of decreased cytotoxicity with increasing test time period. While ADSEAL had the highest cytotoxicity with statistically insignificant effect of time intervals or concentrations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信