手法治疗师对腰椎管狭窄症患者最佳非药物保守治疗的评价。国际德尔菲研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Konstantinos Prentzas , Zacharias Dimitriadis , Renée De Ruijter , Sionnadh McLean
{"title":"手法治疗师对腰椎管狭窄症患者最佳非药物保守治疗的评价。国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"Konstantinos Prentzas ,&nbsp;Zacharias Dimitriadis ,&nbsp;Renée De Ruijter ,&nbsp;Sionnadh McLean","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a slow progressive degenerative disorder associated with chronic pain and disability. Although consensus-based international guidelines for invasive treatment of patients with LSS exist, few consensus-based guidelines for optimal conservative management strategies have been published.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To achieve manual therapists’ consensus on optimal physiotherapeutic management strategies for LSS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study employed a three-round, email–based International Delphi survey. All qualified members of the International Maitland Teacher Association (IMTA) (n = 30) were invited to participate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve IMTA teachers participated in the study. Eight essential physiotherapy management strategies were identified, as follows: 1. Detailed assessment with in-depth interview; 2. Recognition of red flags, contraindications and precautions; 3. Neurological examination; 4. Postural and movement analysis with related ergonomics; 5. Functional analysis; 6. Individualized treatment based on assessment findings and research evidence; 7. Aerobic training and 8. Patient education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This Delphi survey provides a foundation for physiotherapists to individualize and optimise management approaches for patients with LSS. With a growing elderly population, there is an increasing need for evidence-based conservative management guidelines based on high quality research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual therapists’ appraisal of optimal non-pharmacological conservative management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. An international Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Prentzas ,&nbsp;Zacharias Dimitriadis ,&nbsp;Renée De Ruijter ,&nbsp;Sionnadh McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a slow progressive degenerative disorder associated with chronic pain and disability. Although consensus-based international guidelines for invasive treatment of patients with LSS exist, few consensus-based guidelines for optimal conservative management strategies have been published.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To achieve manual therapists’ consensus on optimal physiotherapeutic management strategies for LSS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study employed a three-round, email–based International Delphi survey. All qualified members of the International Maitland Teacher Association (IMTA) (n = 30) were invited to participate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve IMTA teachers participated in the study. Eight essential physiotherapy management strategies were identified, as follows: 1. Detailed assessment with in-depth interview; 2. Recognition of red flags, contraindications and precautions; 3. Neurological examination; 4. Postural and movement analysis with related ergonomics; 5. Functional analysis; 6. Individualized treatment based on assessment findings and research evidence; 7. Aerobic training and 8. Patient education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This Delphi survey provides a foundation for physiotherapists to individualize and optimise management approaches for patients with LSS. With a growing elderly population, there is an increasing need for evidence-based conservative management guidelines based on high quality research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是一种缓慢进展的退行性疾病,与慢性疼痛和残疾有关。尽管国际上已就腰椎管狭窄症患者的侵入性治疗达成了共识,但关于最佳保守治疗策略的共识性指南却鲜有发表。方法本研究采用了三轮基于电子邮件的国际德尔菲调查。所有符合条件的国际梅特兰教师协会(IMTA)成员(n = 30)均受邀参加。研究确定了以下八项基本物理治疗管理策略:1.1.通过深入访谈进行详细评估;2.识别危险信号、禁忌症和预防措施;3.神经系统检查;4.姿势和运动分析及相关人体工程学分析;5.功能分析;6.根据评估结果和研究证据进行个性化治疗;7.有氧训练;8.患者教育。结论这项德尔菲调查为物理治疗师个性化和优化 LSS 患者的治疗方法奠定了基础。随着老年人口的不断增加,越来越需要基于高质量研究的循证保守治疗指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manual therapists’ appraisal of optimal non-pharmacological conservative management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. An international Delphi study

Background

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a slow progressive degenerative disorder associated with chronic pain and disability. Although consensus-based international guidelines for invasive treatment of patients with LSS exist, few consensus-based guidelines for optimal conservative management strategies have been published.

Objective

To achieve manual therapists’ consensus on optimal physiotherapeutic management strategies for LSS.

Methods

The study employed a three-round, email–based International Delphi survey. All qualified members of the International Maitland Teacher Association (IMTA) (n = 30) were invited to participate.

Results

Twelve IMTA teachers participated in the study. Eight essential physiotherapy management strategies were identified, as follows: 1. Detailed assessment with in-depth interview; 2. Recognition of red flags, contraindications and precautions; 3. Neurological examination; 4. Postural and movement analysis with related ergonomics; 5. Functional analysis; 6. Individualized treatment based on assessment findings and research evidence; 7. Aerobic training and 8. Patient education.

Conclusion

This Delphi survey provides a foundation for physiotherapists to individualize and optimise management approaches for patients with LSS. With a growing elderly population, there is an increasing need for evidence-based conservative management guidelines based on high quality research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信