专门的捐献者护理机构模式提高了手术室的效率

{"title":"专门的捐献者护理机构模式提高了手术室的效率","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Organ procurement organizations coordinate organ donation through 2 distinct models of care: the conventional model, in which donors are managed at hospitals where brain death occurs, and the specialized donor care facility (SDCF) model, where brain dead donors are transferred to a freestanding facility. The aim of this study is to compare operating room efficiency for procurements between the SDCF and conventional models of care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a prospective analysis of operating room efficiency between thoracic donor procurement operations performed at a SDCF and other organ procurement organizations using the conventional model of care. Key domains of efficiency were chosen based on a literature review and expert panel consensus. Data were collected in real time over a 12-month period via direct observation and personnel interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between January 1 and December 31, 2018, data were obtained from 54 procurement operations (n = 17 SDCF; n = 37 conventional). Donors in the 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Procurements at the SDCF were performed with fewer nonsurgeon team members (2 vs 4, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) without any difference in the organ yield. SDCF procurements more closely adhered to planned start times (6 vs 61 minute difference, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and a trend was observed for SDCF-based procurements to facilitate daytime transplant operations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SDCF model of donor care outperforms the conventional model in several important measures of operating room efficiency. These differences are likely to result in cost savings and improved healthcare provider satisfaction in the highly effort- and resource-intensive landscape of organ transplantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 563-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001293/pdfft?md5=c93f42b7a066c788cf296a578a3fddd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001293-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Specialized Donor Care Facility Model Improves Operating Room Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Organ procurement organizations coordinate organ donation through 2 distinct models of care: the conventional model, in which donors are managed at hospitals where brain death occurs, and the specialized donor care facility (SDCF) model, where brain dead donors are transferred to a freestanding facility. The aim of this study is to compare operating room efficiency for procurements between the SDCF and conventional models of care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a prospective analysis of operating room efficiency between thoracic donor procurement operations performed at a SDCF and other organ procurement organizations using the conventional model of care. Key domains of efficiency were chosen based on a literature review and expert panel consensus. Data were collected in real time over a 12-month period via direct observation and personnel interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between January 1 and December 31, 2018, data were obtained from 54 procurement operations (n = 17 SDCF; n = 37 conventional). Donors in the 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Procurements at the SDCF were performed with fewer nonsurgeon team members (2 vs 4, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) without any difference in the organ yield. SDCF procurements more closely adhered to planned start times (6 vs 61 minute difference, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and a trend was observed for SDCF-based procurements to facilitate daytime transplant operations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SDCF model of donor care outperforms the conventional model in several important measures of operating room efficiency. These differences are likely to result in cost savings and improved healthcare provider satisfaction in the highly effort- and resource-intensive landscape of organ transplantation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 563-566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001293/pdfft?md5=c93f42b7a066c788cf296a578a3fddd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001293-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景器官获取组织通过两种不同的护理模式协调器官捐献:一种是传统模式,即在发生脑死亡的医院管理捐献者;另一种是专门的捐献者护理设施(SDCF)模式,即把脑死亡捐献者转移到一个独立的设施。本研究的目的是比较SDCF和传统医疗模式下手术室的采购效率。方法我们对SDCF和其他采用传统医疗模式的器官采购组织进行的胸腔捐献者采购手术的手术室效率进行了前瞻性分析。根据文献综述和专家小组的共识选择了效率的关键领域。通过直接观察和人员访谈实时收集了12个月内的数据。结果在2018年1月1日至12月31日期间,从54个采购操作中获得了数据(n = 17 SDCF;n = 37常规)。两组捐助者的基线特征相似。在SDCF进行的采购中,非外科医生团队成员较少(2 vs 4,P <.001),但器官产量没有任何差异。SDCF 采购更严格遵守计划的开始时间(6 分钟与 61 分钟之差,P < .001),并且观察到基于 SDCF 的采购有促进日间移植手术的趋势。这些差异很可能会在高度耗费精力和资源的器官移植领域节约成本并提高医疗服务提供者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Specialized Donor Care Facility Model Improves Operating Room Efficiency

Background

Organ procurement organizations coordinate organ donation through 2 distinct models of care: the conventional model, in which donors are managed at hospitals where brain death occurs, and the specialized donor care facility (SDCF) model, where brain dead donors are transferred to a freestanding facility. The aim of this study is to compare operating room efficiency for procurements between the SDCF and conventional models of care.

Methods

We performed a prospective analysis of operating room efficiency between thoracic donor procurement operations performed at a SDCF and other organ procurement organizations using the conventional model of care. Key domains of efficiency were chosen based on a literature review and expert panel consensus. Data were collected in real time over a 12-month period via direct observation and personnel interviews.

Results

Between January 1 and December 31, 2018, data were obtained from 54 procurement operations (n = 17 SDCF; n = 37 conventional). Donors in the 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Procurements at the SDCF were performed with fewer nonsurgeon team members (2 vs 4, P < .001) without any difference in the organ yield. SDCF procurements more closely adhered to planned start times (6 vs 61 minute difference, P < .001), and a trend was observed for SDCF-based procurements to facilitate daytime transplant operations.

Conclusions

The SDCF model of donor care outperforms the conventional model in several important measures of operating room efficiency. These differences are likely to result in cost savings and improved healthcare provider satisfaction in the highly effort- and resource-intensive landscape of organ transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信