哥伦比亚宪政镜像中的和平:1991 年制宪会议令人不安的承诺及其在过渡时期宪政中的重新确认。

T. Luna
{"title":"哥伦比亚宪政镜像中的和平:1991 年制宪会议令人不安的承诺及其在过渡时期宪政中的重新确认。","authors":"T. Luna","doi":"10.29263/lar12.2024.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peace is a right and a duty of obligatory compliance with the literal wording of Article 22 of the 1991 Political Constitution. Its arrival in Colombian constitutionalism is commonly presented as a rupture resulting from a national scenario of consensus and generalized clamor for peace in the early 1990s. However, although the right to peace was included for the first time as a right in the 1991 Constitution, peace as a constitutional value has been present as a quest in the history of Colombian constitutionalism and has been recurrently appealed to in moments of constitutional change in which the law has reclaimed from violence its role as organizer and recuperator of the thread of time. The text presented here defends the central idea that the Colombian Constitutional Court re-signified the constituent history around peace in times of transition and the duty of memory around the 2016 Peace Agreement, choosing a romanticized and foundational version of the past that freezes in time other pasts, subjects and alternative visions of peace.","PeriodicalId":348032,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La paz en el espejo del constitucionalismo colombiano: la promesa incómoda de la Constituyente de 1991 y su resignificación en el constitucionalismo de la transición\",\"authors\":\"T. Luna\",\"doi\":\"10.29263/lar12.2024.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peace is a right and a duty of obligatory compliance with the literal wording of Article 22 of the 1991 Political Constitution. Its arrival in Colombian constitutionalism is commonly presented as a rupture resulting from a national scenario of consensus and generalized clamor for peace in the early 1990s. However, although the right to peace was included for the first time as a right in the 1991 Constitution, peace as a constitutional value has been present as a quest in the history of Colombian constitutionalism and has been recurrently appealed to in moments of constitutional change in which the law has reclaimed from violence its role as organizer and recuperator of the thread of time. The text presented here defends the central idea that the Colombian Constitutional Court re-signified the constituent history around peace in times of transition and the duty of memory around the 2016 Peace Agreement, choosing a romanticized and foundational version of the past that freezes in time other pasts, subjects and alternative visions of peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Law Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29263/lar12.2024.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29263/lar12.2024.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 1991 年《政治宪法》第 22 条的字面措辞,和平是一项权利,也是一项义不容辞的责任。哥伦比亚宪法的出现通常被认为是 1990 年代初全国上下达成共识、普遍呼吁和平的结果。然而,尽管 1991 年《宪法》首次将和平权作为一项权利纳入其中,但和平作为一种宪法价值一直作为一种追求存在于哥伦比亚的宪法史中,并在宪法变革的时刻被反复呼吁,在这些变革中,法律从暴力中夺回了其作为时间线的组织者和恢复者的角色。本文提出的核心观点是,哥伦比亚宪法法院围绕转型时期的和平和 2016 年《和平协定》的记忆义务,选择了一个浪漫化和基础化的过去版本,将其他过去、主体和和平的替代愿景凝固在时间中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La paz en el espejo del constitucionalismo colombiano: la promesa incómoda de la Constituyente de 1991 y su resignificación en el constitucionalismo de la transición
Peace is a right and a duty of obligatory compliance with the literal wording of Article 22 of the 1991 Political Constitution. Its arrival in Colombian constitutionalism is commonly presented as a rupture resulting from a national scenario of consensus and generalized clamor for peace in the early 1990s. However, although the right to peace was included for the first time as a right in the 1991 Constitution, peace as a constitutional value has been present as a quest in the history of Colombian constitutionalism and has been recurrently appealed to in moments of constitutional change in which the law has reclaimed from violence its role as organizer and recuperator of the thread of time. The text presented here defends the central idea that the Colombian Constitutional Court re-signified the constituent history around peace in times of transition and the duty of memory around the 2016 Peace Agreement, choosing a romanticized and foundational version of the past that freezes in time other pasts, subjects and alternative visions of peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信