人们为何为暴力辩护?接受强奸神话的动机基础的作用

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
O.A. Ananyeva, I. Prusova, S.A. Zakharova
{"title":"人们为何为暴力辩护?接受强奸神话的动机基础的作用","authors":"O.A. Ananyeva, I. Prusova, S.A. Zakharova","doi":"10.17759/psylaw.2024140101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the role of existential, epistemic, and relational motivational foundations in the enactment of rape myths. The online study empirically tested a model in which motivational foundations were included as predictors, rape myth acceptance as dependent variables, socio-demographic characteristics (gender, education, and income level) - control variables. A total of 739 Russian residents (381 men and 358 women) aged 18 to 79 years (M=36.8, SD=11.5) participated in the online study. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires to measure need for cognitive closure, belief in a dangerous and competitive world, fear of death, shared reality, and acceptance of rape myths. Structural equation modeling showed that the most significant contribution in the support of the rape myth is made by the need for order (epistemic motivational foundations) and belief in a competitive world (existential motivational foundations). The current research shed light on the main motivational foundations of the rape myth acceptance that might be used in the social programs to reduce tolerance towards violence.","PeriodicalId":43238,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Law","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why People Justify Violence: The Role of Motivational Foundations in Rape Myths Acceptance\",\"authors\":\"O.A. Ananyeva, I. Prusova, S.A. Zakharova\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/psylaw.2024140101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the role of existential, epistemic, and relational motivational foundations in the enactment of rape myths. The online study empirically tested a model in which motivational foundations were included as predictors, rape myth acceptance as dependent variables, socio-demographic characteristics (gender, education, and income level) - control variables. A total of 739 Russian residents (381 men and 358 women) aged 18 to 79 years (M=36.8, SD=11.5) participated in the online study. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires to measure need for cognitive closure, belief in a dangerous and competitive world, fear of death, shared reality, and acceptance of rape myths. Structural equation modeling showed that the most significant contribution in the support of the rape myth is made by the need for order (epistemic motivational foundations) and belief in a competitive world (existential motivational foundations). The current research shed light on the main motivational foundations of the rape myth acceptance that might be used in the social programs to reduce tolerance towards violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是考察存在、认识和关系动机基础在强奸神话形成过程中的作用。在线研究对一个模型进行了实证检验,在该模型中,动机基础被列为预测变量,强奸神话接受度被列为因变量,社会人口特征(性别、教育程度和收入水平)被列为控制变量。共有 739 名俄罗斯居民(381 名男性和 358 名女性)参加了在线研究,他们的年龄在 18 至 79 岁之间(M=36.8,SD=11.5)。参与者被要求填写调查问卷,以测量认知封闭的需求、对危险和竞争性世界的信念、对死亡的恐惧、共同的现实以及对强奸神话的接受程度。结构方程模型显示,对秩序的需求(认识动机基础)和对竞争世界的信念(存在动机基础)对支持强奸神话做出了最重要的贡献。目前的研究揭示了接受强奸神话的主要动机基础,这些动机基础可用于减少对暴力容忍度的社会计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why People Justify Violence: The Role of Motivational Foundations in Rape Myths Acceptance
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of existential, epistemic, and relational motivational foundations in the enactment of rape myths. The online study empirically tested a model in which motivational foundations were included as predictors, rape myth acceptance as dependent variables, socio-demographic characteristics (gender, education, and income level) - control variables. A total of 739 Russian residents (381 men and 358 women) aged 18 to 79 years (M=36.8, SD=11.5) participated in the online study. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires to measure need for cognitive closure, belief in a dangerous and competitive world, fear of death, shared reality, and acceptance of rape myths. Structural equation modeling showed that the most significant contribution in the support of the rape myth is made by the need for order (epistemic motivational foundations) and belief in a competitive world (existential motivational foundations). The current research shed light on the main motivational foundations of the rape myth acceptance that might be used in the social programs to reduce tolerance towards violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Law
Psychology and Law PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
75.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信