针对 MS Glow 品牌的诚信原则

Legal Spirit Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091
Taslim Abd. Rachman, Rusdin Alauddin, Sultan Alwan
{"title":"针对 MS Glow 品牌的诚信原则","authors":"Taslim Abd. Rachman, Rusdin Alauddin, Sultan Alwan","doi":"10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal protection is an important aspect that needs to be considered in the controversy between MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks. PT Kosmetika Global Indonesia, the MS Glow brand holder that has registered its brand with the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, requires adequate legal protection. The public sees that the products of the MS Glow brand are better known than the products of the PS Glow brand, and there is a view that PS Glow is trying to hijack the popularity of MS Glow. Through normative juridical legal research, it was found that in the context of the principle of good faith, MS Glow is entitled to legal protection as a brand owner. The brand owner has the exclusive right to the use of its brand and the government is responsible for ensuring this protection. The judge's decision in the dispute between the MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks (Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby) has fulfilled the principle of legal certainty. The judge refers to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademark Registration and Geographical Indications as well as the principle of \"first to file\". However, the decision has not fully reflected justice and expediency. In the context of trademark registration, the \"first to file\" principle needs to be evaluated by the government to make it fairer. The lengthy trademark registration process must pay close attention to every detail, the Director General of IPR must be more active in socializing Law Number 20 Year 2016, including the principle of \"first to file\" to the public so that understanding of the trademark and the registration process becomes better.","PeriodicalId":489002,"journal":{"name":"Legal Spirit","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prinsip Itikad Baik Terhadap Merek MS Glow\",\"authors\":\"Taslim Abd. Rachman, Rusdin Alauddin, Sultan Alwan\",\"doi\":\"10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal protection is an important aspect that needs to be considered in the controversy between MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks. PT Kosmetika Global Indonesia, the MS Glow brand holder that has registered its brand with the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, requires adequate legal protection. The public sees that the products of the MS Glow brand are better known than the products of the PS Glow brand, and there is a view that PS Glow is trying to hijack the popularity of MS Glow. Through normative juridical legal research, it was found that in the context of the principle of good faith, MS Glow is entitled to legal protection as a brand owner. The brand owner has the exclusive right to the use of its brand and the government is responsible for ensuring this protection. The judge's decision in the dispute between the MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks (Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby) has fulfilled the principle of legal certainty. The judge refers to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademark Registration and Geographical Indications as well as the principle of \\\"first to file\\\". However, the decision has not fully reflected justice and expediency. In the context of trademark registration, the \\\"first to file\\\" principle needs to be evaluated by the government to make it fairer. The lengthy trademark registration process must pay close attention to every detail, the Director General of IPR must be more active in socializing Law Number 20 Year 2016, including the principle of \\\"first to file\\\" to the public so that understanding of the trademark and the registration process becomes better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Spirit\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Spirit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Spirit","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律保护是 MS Glow 和 PS Glow 商标争议中需要考虑的一个重要方面。印度尼西亚 PT Kosmetika Global 公司是 MS Glow 品牌的持有者,已在知识产权总局注册了自己的品牌,因此需要充分的法律保护。在公众看来,MS Glow 品牌的产品比 PS Glow 品牌的产品更为知名,有观点认为 PS Glow 试图抢夺 MS Glow 的知名度。通过规范法学研究发现,在诚实信用原则的背景下,MS Glow 作为品牌所有者有权获得法律保护。品牌所有者对其品牌的使用享有专有权,政府有责任确保这种保护。法官对 MS Glow 和 PS Glow 商标争议的判决(判决编号 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby)符合法律确定性原则。法官援引了 2016 年第 20 号《商标注册和地理标志法》以及 "申请在先 "原则。然而,该判决并未充分体现公正性和权宜性。在商标注册方面,政府需要对 "申请在先 "原则进行评估,使其更加公平。漫长的商标注册过程必须密切关注每一个细节,知识产权局局长必须更加积极地向公众宣传包括 "申请在先 "原则在内的 2016 年第 20 号法律,以便公众更好地了解商标和注册过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prinsip Itikad Baik Terhadap Merek MS Glow
Legal protection is an important aspect that needs to be considered in the controversy between MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks. PT Kosmetika Global Indonesia, the MS Glow brand holder that has registered its brand with the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, requires adequate legal protection. The public sees that the products of the MS Glow brand are better known than the products of the PS Glow brand, and there is a view that PS Glow is trying to hijack the popularity of MS Glow. Through normative juridical legal research, it was found that in the context of the principle of good faith, MS Glow is entitled to legal protection as a brand owner. The brand owner has the exclusive right to the use of its brand and the government is responsible for ensuring this protection. The judge's decision in the dispute between the MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks (Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby) has fulfilled the principle of legal certainty. The judge refers to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademark Registration and Geographical Indications as well as the principle of "first to file". However, the decision has not fully reflected justice and expediency. In the context of trademark registration, the "first to file" principle needs to be evaluated by the government to make it fairer. The lengthy trademark registration process must pay close attention to every detail, the Director General of IPR must be more active in socializing Law Number 20 Year 2016, including the principle of "first to file" to the public so that understanding of the trademark and the registration process becomes better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信