Sophie Frank, G. Reiter, Oliver Leingang, Philipp Fuchs, Leonard M. Coulibaly, Virginia Mares, H. Bogunović, U. Schmidt-Erfurth
{"title":"中度老年性视网膜病变中感光器和视网膜色素上皮定量的进展:高分辨率与标准 SPECTRALIS OCT 的比较","authors":"Sophie Frank, G. Reiter, Oliver Leingang, Philipp Fuchs, Leonard M. Coulibaly, Virginia Mares, H. Bogunović, U. Schmidt-Erfurth","doi":"10.1097/iae.0000000000004118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In this study we investigated differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors (PR) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).\n \n \n \n Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, RPE and PR layers were segmented using validated AI-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness- and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen vs. non-drusen areas and EDTRS subfields using mixed-effects models.\n \n \n \n Thirty-three eyes from 28 iAMD patients were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared to 2.5% on High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than perifoveal loss (p<0.05). PR thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in non-drusen regions (p<0.001). RPE appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (p<0.01).\n \n \n \n Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in iAMD with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of AMD.\n","PeriodicalId":21178,"journal":{"name":"Retina","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in Photoreceptor and Retinal pigment epithelium Quantifications in intermediate AMD: High-Res versus Standard SPECTRALIS OCT\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Frank, G. Reiter, Oliver Leingang, Philipp Fuchs, Leonard M. Coulibaly, Virginia Mares, H. Bogunović, U. Schmidt-Erfurth\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/iae.0000000000004118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n In this study we investigated differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors (PR) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, RPE and PR layers were segmented using validated AI-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness- and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen vs. non-drusen areas and EDTRS subfields using mixed-effects models.\\n \\n \\n \\n Thirty-three eyes from 28 iAMD patients were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared to 2.5% on High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than perifoveal loss (p<0.05). PR thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in non-drusen regions (p<0.001). RPE appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (p<0.01).\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in iAMD with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of AMD.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,我们研究了不同轴向分辨率的高分辨率光学相干断层成像(OCT)设备在量化中度年龄相关性黄斑变性(iAMD)患者视网膜色素上皮(RPE)和感光细胞(PR)时,在视网膜特征可视化方面的差异。 患者使用标准 SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT 和研究用 High-Res OCT 设备(均由德国海德堡海德堡工程公司生产)进行成像。使用经过验证的基于人工智能的算法对玻璃体、RPE 和 PR 层进行分割,然后进行手动校正。计算了所有患者的厚度图和色素图。使用混合效应模型比较了不同设备、有色素区域与无色素区域以及 EDTRS 子区域之间的损失和厚度测量值。 共纳入了 28 名 iAMD 患者的 33 只眼睛。标准 OCT 的归一化 PR 完整性损失为 4.6%,明显高于高分辨率 OCT 的 2.5%。中央和视网膜旁的 PR 完整性损失大于视网膜周围的损失(P<0.05)。PR 厚度在高倍率 OCT 和非皱纹区域有所增加(p<0.001)。标准 OCT 显示 RPE 更厚,且位于色素沉着上方(p<0.01)。 我们的研究表明,高分辨率 OCT 能够更精确地识别 iAMD 中被检查层的状况。这种改进的活体成像技术可能有助于我们了解 AMD 的病理生理学和发展过程。
Advances in Photoreceptor and Retinal pigment epithelium Quantifications in intermediate AMD: High-Res versus Standard SPECTRALIS OCT
In this study we investigated differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors (PR) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).
Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, RPE and PR layers were segmented using validated AI-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness- and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen vs. non-drusen areas and EDTRS subfields using mixed-effects models.
Thirty-three eyes from 28 iAMD patients were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared to 2.5% on High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than perifoveal loss (p<0.05). PR thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in non-drusen regions (p<0.001). RPE appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (p<0.01).
Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in iAMD with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of AMD.