修订版酒精保护行为策略量表-20 (PBSS-20) 子类型：直接/控制消费和间接/减少伤害 PBS 分析。

IF 0.8 Q4 Medicine

JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1177/00472379241246367

Roselyn S Peterson, Robert D Dvorak, Emily K. Burr, Ardhys N De Leon, Samantha J Klaver, Madison H Maynard, Emma R Hayden, Bradley Aguilar

{"title":"修订版酒精保护行为策略量表-20 (PBSS-20) 子类型：直接/控制消费和间接/减少伤害 PBS 分析。","authors":"Roselyn S Peterson, Robert D Dvorak, Emily K. Burr, Ardhys N De Leon, Samantha J Klaver, Madison H Maynard, Emma R Hayden, Bradley Aguilar","doi":"10.1177/00472379241246367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are commonly conceptualized with a three-factor model, as used in the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20 (PBSS-20). However, inconsistencies exist between factors and drinking outcomes. The current study used factor analysis to test a two-factor structure directly via controlled consumption (Direct/CC) and indirectly via harm reduction (Indirect/HR) using the PBSS-20 among a combined sample of n = 4,883 drinkers. Both the two- and three-factor structures evince similar model fit. A two-factor model yielded more concise PBS measurement. Negative associations were observed with consumption (Direct/CC PBS) and problems (Indirect/HR). A condensed, eight-item, two-factor model accounted for less variance in alcohol consumption, however more variance in alcohol-related problems. A more consistent framework for understanding the impact of PBS on alcohol-related outcomes is provided.","PeriodicalId":46281,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revised Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20 (PBSS-20) Sub-Types: An Analysis of Direct/Controlled Consumption and Indirect/Harm Reduction PBS.\",\"authors\":\"Roselyn S Peterson, Robert D Dvorak, Emily K. Burr, Ardhys N De Leon, Samantha J Klaver, Madison H Maynard, Emma R Hayden, Bradley Aguilar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00472379241246367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are commonly conceptualized with a three-factor model, as used in the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20 (PBSS-20). However, inconsistencies exist between factors and drinking outcomes. The current study used factor analysis to test a two-factor structure directly via controlled consumption (Direct/CC) and indirectly via harm reduction (Indirect/HR) using the PBSS-20 among a combined sample of n = 4,883 drinkers. Both the two- and three-factor structures evince similar model fit. A two-factor model yielded more concise PBS measurement. Negative associations were observed with consumption (Direct/CC PBS) and problems (Indirect/HR). A condensed, eight-item, two-factor model accounted for less variance in alcohol consumption, however more variance in alcohol-related problems. A more consistent framework for understanding the impact of PBS on alcohol-related outcomes is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472379241246367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472379241246367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

酒精保护行为策略（PBS）通常采用三因素模型进行概念化，如保护行为策略量表-20（PBSS-20）中所使用的。然而，因子与饮酒结果之间存在不一致。本研究使用因素分析法，在 n = 4,883 名饮酒者的综合样本中，使用 PBSS-20 直接通过控制消费（Direct/CC）和间接通过减少危害（Indirect/HR）对双因素结构进行了测试。双因素结构和三因素结构的模型拟合度相似。双因素模型对 PBS 的测量更为简洁。观察发现，PBS 与消费（直接/CC PBS）和问题（间接/HR）呈负相关。一个浓缩的、8 个项目的双因素模型在酒精消费方面的差异较小，但在酒精相关问题方面的差异较大。这为理解 PBS 对酒精相关结果的影响提供了一个更加一致的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Revised Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20 (PBSS-20) Sub-Types: An Analysis of Direct/Controlled Consumption and Indirect/Harm Reduction PBS.

Alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are commonly conceptualized with a three-factor model, as used in the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20 (PBSS-20). However, inconsistencies exist between factors and drinking outcomes. The current study used factor analysis to test a two-factor structure directly via controlled consumption (Direct/CC) and indirectly via harm reduction (Indirect/HR) using the PBSS-20 among a combined sample of n = 4,883 drinkers. Both the two- and three-factor structures evince similar model fit. A two-factor model yielded more concise PBS measurement. Negative associations were observed with consumption (Direct/CC PBS) and problems (Indirect/HR). A condensed, eight-item, two-factor model accounted for less variance in alcohol consumption, however more variance in alcohol-related problems. A more consistent framework for understanding the impact of PBS on alcohol-related outcomes is provided.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Authoritative, peer-refereed publication affording a wide-ranging coverage of important trends and developments in the drug field. Whatever your area of special interest, the Journal of Drug Education brings timely, helpful information, insights and methodologies that can be adapted to various situations. Look to this Quarterly for critical analyses, innovative approaches, scholarly standards, and clear, concise reports on theoretical, research and programmatic issues.