儿童保护法》与《婚姻法》在解决早婚问题上的法律困境

Justisi Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.33506/js.v10i2.2814
Winsherly Tan, Agustianto Agustianto, Febri Jaya
{"title":"儿童保护法》与《婚姻法》在解决早婚问题上的法律困境","authors":"Winsherly Tan, Agustianto Agustianto, Febri Jaya","doi":"10.33506/js.v10i2.2814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze marriage regulations with child protection, namely Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage and Law Number 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. These two regulations will be analyzed to protect children who marry underage. The study method used is normative juridical. As a novelty, the study tries to compare marriage arrangements with child protection arrangements. The purpose and perspective of underage marriage between the two regulations are different. The research results show that marriage law has a different spirit than child protection law. This is shown in the marriage law, which states that children are still allowed to marry for urgent reasons by applying for a dispensation to the court. However, child protection law explicitly does not allow this. Therefore, there is a need for more detailed regulation regarding the category of \"urgent reasons\" regulated in the marriage law.\nKeywords: Marriage; Children; Protection.","PeriodicalId":477047,"journal":{"name":"Justisi","volume":"391 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Dilemma between Law on Protection Child and Marriage Law in Addressing Early Marriage\",\"authors\":\"Winsherly Tan, Agustianto Agustianto, Febri Jaya\",\"doi\":\"10.33506/js.v10i2.2814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze marriage regulations with child protection, namely Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage and Law Number 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. These two regulations will be analyzed to protect children who marry underage. The study method used is normative juridical. As a novelty, the study tries to compare marriage arrangements with child protection arrangements. The purpose and perspective of underage marriage between the two regulations are different. The research results show that marriage law has a different spirit than child protection law. This is shown in the marriage law, which states that children are still allowed to marry for urgent reasons by applying for a dispensation to the court. However, child protection law explicitly does not allow this. Therefore, there is a need for more detailed regulation regarding the category of \\\"urgent reasons\\\" regulated in the marriage law.\\nKeywords: Marriage; Children; Protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justisi\",\"volume\":\"391 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.2814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.2814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析与儿童保护有关的婚姻法规,即 2019 年第 16 号《婚姻法》和 2014 年第 35 号《儿童保护法》。将分析这两项法规对未成年结婚儿童的保护。采用的研究方法是规范法学。作为一项创新,本研究试图将婚姻安排与儿童保护安排进行比较。这两部法规对未成年婚姻的目的和观点是不同的。研究结果表明,婚姻法与儿童保护法具有不同的精神。这体现在婚姻法中,婚姻法规定,儿童仍可因紧急原因向法院申请豁免而结婚。然而,儿童保护法明确规定不允许这样做。因此,有必要对婚姻法中规定的 "紧急原因 "类别做出更详细的规定:婚姻;儿童;保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Dilemma between Law on Protection Child and Marriage Law in Addressing Early Marriage
This study aims to analyze marriage regulations with child protection, namely Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage and Law Number 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. These two regulations will be analyzed to protect children who marry underage. The study method used is normative juridical. As a novelty, the study tries to compare marriage arrangements with child protection arrangements. The purpose and perspective of underage marriage between the two regulations are different. The research results show that marriage law has a different spirit than child protection law. This is shown in the marriage law, which states that children are still allowed to marry for urgent reasons by applying for a dispensation to the court. However, child protection law explicitly does not allow this. Therefore, there is a need for more detailed regulation regarding the category of "urgent reasons" regulated in the marriage law. Keywords: Marriage; Children; Protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信