术前抗生素不适合用于关闭口腔外沟通之前

Q3 Dentistry
Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1111/ors.12889
V. M. Woo, S. Delpachitra
{"title":"术前抗生素不适合用于关闭口腔外沟通之前","authors":"V. M. Woo, S. Delpachitra","doi":"10.1111/ors.12889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper was to determine whether the use of preoperative antibiotics improves surgical outcomes following oroantral communication (OAC) closure.A single‐centre, retrospective study was conducted on all OAC repair procedures over a 24‐month period assessing a number of datapoints including the site of OAC occurrence, time to repair, local anaesthetic or general anaesthetic, and any complications noted. Patient follow‐up was up to 3 months post‐operative OAC closure. Data outputs primarily included descriptive statistics for demographic datasets included in the study. Fisher's exact test was used to determine non‐random associations between categorical variables (preoperative antibiotics vs. no preoperative antibiotics; successful closure vs. failed closure).Thirty‐one patients met the inclusion criteria and timeframe of this study. All OACs were a result of dental extraction. For patients who had an OAC visualised immediately after extraction, 18 had an OAC repair completed on the same day. Fifteen patients had a delayed closure, defined as a closure over 48 h following the development of OAC. Thirteen patients had their procedure completed under local anaesthetic; none had preoperative antibiotics prior to surgery. Only one patient with delayed closure of an OAC who had a procedure completed under local anaesthetic had a prophylactic dose 1 h prior to surgery. Patients who underwent OAC closure under general anaesthetic received an intra‐operative dose of antibiotics. Using Fisher's exact test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (preoperative antibiotics given vs. no preoperative antibiotics given) with regard to the likelihood of success following OAC closure (p = 0.1419).This study demonstrates that the routine use of preoperative antibiotics may not improve surgical outcomes following the closure of oroantral communication.","PeriodicalId":38418,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery","volume":"29 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative antibiotics are not indicated prior to closure of oroantral communication\",\"authors\":\"V. M. Woo, S. Delpachitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ors.12889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper was to determine whether the use of preoperative antibiotics improves surgical outcomes following oroantral communication (OAC) closure.A single‐centre, retrospective study was conducted on all OAC repair procedures over a 24‐month period assessing a number of datapoints including the site of OAC occurrence, time to repair, local anaesthetic or general anaesthetic, and any complications noted. Patient follow‐up was up to 3 months post‐operative OAC closure. Data outputs primarily included descriptive statistics for demographic datasets included in the study. Fisher's exact test was used to determine non‐random associations between categorical variables (preoperative antibiotics vs. no preoperative antibiotics; successful closure vs. failed closure).Thirty‐one patients met the inclusion criteria and timeframe of this study. All OACs were a result of dental extraction. For patients who had an OAC visualised immediately after extraction, 18 had an OAC repair completed on the same day. Fifteen patients had a delayed closure, defined as a closure over 48 h following the development of OAC. Thirteen patients had their procedure completed under local anaesthetic; none had preoperative antibiotics prior to surgery. Only one patient with delayed closure of an OAC who had a procedure completed under local anaesthetic had a prophylactic dose 1 h prior to surgery. Patients who underwent OAC closure under general anaesthetic received an intra‐operative dose of antibiotics. Using Fisher's exact test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (preoperative antibiotics given vs. no preoperative antibiotics given) with regard to the likelihood of success following OAC closure (p = 0.1419).This study demonstrates that the routine use of preoperative antibiotics may not improve surgical outcomes following the closure of oroantral communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在确定术前使用抗生素是否能改善口腔外交通(OAC)闭合术后的手术效果。这项单中心回顾性研究针对 24 个月内的所有口腔外交通修复手术进行了评估,评估的数据点包括发生口腔外交通的部位、修复时间、局部麻醉或全身麻醉以及注意到的任何并发症。患者随访时间为 OAC 术后 3 个月。数据输出主要包括研究中人口学数据集的描述性统计。费雪精确检验用于确定分类变量(术前使用抗生素与术前未使用抗生素;成功闭合与失败闭合)之间的非随机关联。所有 OAC 均为拔牙所致。在拔牙后立即发现 OAC 的患者中,有 18 名患者在当天完成了 OAC 修复。15名患者进行了延迟闭合,即在出现OAC超过48小时后进行闭合。13 名患者的手术是在局部麻醉下完成的,术前均未使用抗生素。只有一名在局部麻醉下完成手术的 OAC 延迟闭合患者在术前 1 小时服用了预防性药物。在全身麻醉下进行 OAC 关闭术的患者在术中服用了抗生素。通过费舍尔精确检验,两组患者(术前使用抗生素与术前未使用抗生素)在OAC闭合术后的成功率方面没有明显差异(P = 0.1419)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative antibiotics are not indicated prior to closure of oroantral communication
The aim of this paper was to determine whether the use of preoperative antibiotics improves surgical outcomes following oroantral communication (OAC) closure.A single‐centre, retrospective study was conducted on all OAC repair procedures over a 24‐month period assessing a number of datapoints including the site of OAC occurrence, time to repair, local anaesthetic or general anaesthetic, and any complications noted. Patient follow‐up was up to 3 months post‐operative OAC closure. Data outputs primarily included descriptive statistics for demographic datasets included in the study. Fisher's exact test was used to determine non‐random associations between categorical variables (preoperative antibiotics vs. no preoperative antibiotics; successful closure vs. failed closure).Thirty‐one patients met the inclusion criteria and timeframe of this study. All OACs were a result of dental extraction. For patients who had an OAC visualised immediately after extraction, 18 had an OAC repair completed on the same day. Fifteen patients had a delayed closure, defined as a closure over 48 h following the development of OAC. Thirteen patients had their procedure completed under local anaesthetic; none had preoperative antibiotics prior to surgery. Only one patient with delayed closure of an OAC who had a procedure completed under local anaesthetic had a prophylactic dose 1 h prior to surgery. Patients who underwent OAC closure under general anaesthetic received an intra‐operative dose of antibiotics. Using Fisher's exact test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (preoperative antibiotics given vs. no preoperative antibiotics given) with regard to the likelihood of success following OAC closure (p = 0.1419).This study demonstrates that the routine use of preoperative antibiotics may not improve surgical outcomes following the closure of oroantral communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信