非甾体抗炎药的心血管疗效和安全性比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析

Arhum Mahmood, Raheel Chaudhry, Mustafa M Moazam, Mohammed T. Zahee, Imdad Ullah
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药的心血管疗效和安全性比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Arhum Mahmood, Raheel Chaudhry, Mustafa M Moazam, Mohammed T. Zahee, Imdad Ullah","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i55427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, are popular and efficient analgesis and frequent mainstay treatements for inflammatory disorders. However, their cardiovascular safety is questionable. The aims of the current study were: (1) to evaluate the comparative cardiovascular efficacy of NSAIDs; (2) to investigate the cardiovascular safety and risks associated with NSAID use; (3) to highlight the importance of alternative therapies for patients who display contraindications to NSAID. A number of digital databases were explored to retrieve relevant studies. These consist of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, etc. The final sample consisted of 17 primary studies.A total of 12/17 (71%) studies advocated the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs. The remaining 2/17 (11%) showed that there was no discernible difference between the NSAID and non-NSAID groups in terms of mortality, cardio-respiratory morbidity, and cardiovascular risk. A forest plot was created using data from eight distinct studies. The results for the incidence of cardiovascular events were found to be statistically significant. The heterogeneity was calculated to be Tau2= 0.15; Chi2=117.67; df=6; I2=95%. The overall effect size was found to be Z=0.08 (p<0.94); the Hazard Ratio was found to be 0.84, CI=95% (CI, 0.72 = 0.98). Certain agents have a higher risk of causing unfavorable cardiovascular events, although other agents might have a safer profile. Clinicians must have this comprehensive knowledge to balance the therapeutic benefits of NSAIDs with any potential cardiovascular hazards when making judgments.","PeriodicalId":14869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"47 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Cardiovascular Efficacy & Safety of NSAIDs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Arhum Mahmood, Raheel Chaudhry, Mustafa M Moazam, Mohammed T. Zahee, Imdad Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i55427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, are popular and efficient analgesis and frequent mainstay treatements for inflammatory disorders. However, their cardiovascular safety is questionable. The aims of the current study were: (1) to evaluate the comparative cardiovascular efficacy of NSAIDs; (2) to investigate the cardiovascular safety and risks associated with NSAID use; (3) to highlight the importance of alternative therapies for patients who display contraindications to NSAID. A number of digital databases were explored to retrieve relevant studies. These consist of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, etc. The final sample consisted of 17 primary studies.A total of 12/17 (71%) studies advocated the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs. The remaining 2/17 (11%) showed that there was no discernible difference between the NSAID and non-NSAID groups in terms of mortality, cardio-respiratory morbidity, and cardiovascular risk. A forest plot was created using data from eight distinct studies. The results for the incidence of cardiovascular events were found to be statistically significant. The heterogeneity was calculated to be Tau2= 0.15; Chi2=117.67; df=6; I2=95%. The overall effect size was found to be Z=0.08 (p<0.94); the Hazard Ratio was found to be 0.84, CI=95% (CI, 0.72 = 0.98). Certain agents have a higher risk of causing unfavorable cardiovascular events, although other agents might have a safer profile. Clinicians must have this comprehensive knowledge to balance the therapeutic benefits of NSAIDs with any potential cardiovascular hazards when making judgments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"47 35\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i55427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i55427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),即非甾体抗炎药,是常用的高效镇痛药,也是治疗炎症性疾病的常用药物。然而,它们对心血管的安全性却值得怀疑。本研究的目的是(1)评估非甾体抗炎药的心血管疗效比较;(2)调查与使用非甾体抗炎药相关的心血管安全性和风险;(3)强调对非甾体抗炎药有禁忌症的患者使用替代疗法的重要性。为了检索相关研究,我们使用了许多数字数据库。这些数据库包括 ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed、Google Scholar、ScienceDirect 等。共有 12/17 项(71%)研究主张非甾体抗炎药的疗效和安全性。其余2/17(11%)的研究表明,非甾体抗炎药组和非非甾体抗炎药组在死亡率、心肺疾病发病率和心血管风险方面没有明显差异。利用八项不同研究的数据绘制了森林图。结果发现,心血管事件的发生率具有统计学意义。异质性的计算结果为:Tau2=0.15;Chi2=117.67;df=6;I2=95%。总体效应大小为 Z=0.08(P<0.94);危险比为 0.84,CI=95%(CI, 0.72 = 0.98)。某些药物引起不良心血管事件的风险较高,但其他药物可能更安全。临床医生在做出判断时必须掌握这些全面的知识,以平衡非甾体抗炎药的治疗益处和任何潜在的心血管危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Cardiovascular Efficacy & Safety of NSAIDs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, are popular and efficient analgesis and frequent mainstay treatements for inflammatory disorders. However, their cardiovascular safety is questionable. The aims of the current study were: (1) to evaluate the comparative cardiovascular efficacy of NSAIDs; (2) to investigate the cardiovascular safety and risks associated with NSAID use; (3) to highlight the importance of alternative therapies for patients who display contraindications to NSAID. A number of digital databases were explored to retrieve relevant studies. These consist of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, etc. The final sample consisted of 17 primary studies.A total of 12/17 (71%) studies advocated the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs. The remaining 2/17 (11%) showed that there was no discernible difference between the NSAID and non-NSAID groups in terms of mortality, cardio-respiratory morbidity, and cardiovascular risk. A forest plot was created using data from eight distinct studies. The results for the incidence of cardiovascular events were found to be statistically significant. The heterogeneity was calculated to be Tau2= 0.15; Chi2=117.67; df=6; I2=95%. The overall effect size was found to be Z=0.08 (p<0.94); the Hazard Ratio was found to be 0.84, CI=95% (CI, 0.72 = 0.98). Certain agents have a higher risk of causing unfavorable cardiovascular events, although other agents might have a safer profile. Clinicians must have this comprehensive knowledge to balance the therapeutic benefits of NSAIDs with any potential cardiovascular hazards when making judgments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信