对医院环境中牧师干预措施实施决定因素的混合方法评估。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jennifer S. Mascaro, Marianne P Florian, Erin Brauer, P. Palmer, Marcia J. Ash, Maureen Shelton, Roman Palitsky, Deanna M. Kaplan, Shaheen Rana, C. Escoffery, Charles L Raison, George H Grant
{"title":"对医院环境中牧师干预措施实施决定因素的混合方法评估。","authors":"Jennifer S. Mascaro, Marianne P Florian, Erin Brauer, P. Palmer, Marcia J. Ash, Maureen Shelton, Roman Palitsky, Deanna M. Kaplan, Shaheen Rana, C. Escoffery, Charles L Raison, George H Grant","doi":"10.1080/08854726.2024.2323375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare chaplains address broad social and emotional dimensions of care within a pluralistic religious landscape. Although the development and evaluation of chaplaincy interventions has advanced the field, little research has investigated factors influencing the implementation of new chaplain interventions. In this mixed-method study, we examined attitudes about evidence-based interventions held by chaplain residents (n = 39) at the outset of an ACPE-accredited residency program in the southeast United States. We also used semi-structured interviews (n = 9) to examine residents' attitudes, beliefs, and decision-making processes after they trained in the delivery of a novel manualized intervention, Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health (CCSH). Most residents reported favorable attitudes toward manualized approaches prior to training. Interviews revealed complex decision-making processes and highlighted personal motivations and challenges to learning and implementing CCSH. Implementation science can reveal factors related to motivation, intention, and training that may be optimized to improve the implementation of healthcare chaplaincy interventions.","PeriodicalId":45330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-method evaluation of implementation determinants for chaplain intervention in a hospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S. Mascaro, Marianne P Florian, Erin Brauer, P. Palmer, Marcia J. Ash, Maureen Shelton, Roman Palitsky, Deanna M. Kaplan, Shaheen Rana, C. Escoffery, Charles L Raison, George H Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854726.2024.2323375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Healthcare chaplains address broad social and emotional dimensions of care within a pluralistic religious landscape. Although the development and evaluation of chaplaincy interventions has advanced the field, little research has investigated factors influencing the implementation of new chaplain interventions. In this mixed-method study, we examined attitudes about evidence-based interventions held by chaplain residents (n = 39) at the outset of an ACPE-accredited residency program in the southeast United States. We also used semi-structured interviews (n = 9) to examine residents' attitudes, beliefs, and decision-making processes after they trained in the delivery of a novel manualized intervention, Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health (CCSH). Most residents reported favorable attitudes toward manualized approaches prior to training. Interviews revealed complex decision-making processes and highlighted personal motivations and challenges to learning and implementing CCSH. Implementation science can reveal factors related to motivation, intention, and training that may be optimized to improve the implementation of healthcare chaplaincy interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2024.2323375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2024.2323375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在宗教多元化的背景下,医疗保健行业的牧师需要处理广泛的社会和情感方面的护理问题。尽管牧师干预措施的开发和评估推动了这一领域的发展,但很少有研究调查影响新牧师干预措施实施的因素。在这项混合方法研究中,我们考察了美国东南部经 ACPE 认证的住院医师培训项目开始时,住院牧师(39 人)对循证干预措施的态度。我们还采用半结构化访谈(n = 9)的方式,考察了住院医师在接受新型手动干预--以同情为中心的精神健康(CCSH)--培训后的态度、信念和决策过程。大多数住院医师表示,在接受培训之前,他们对人工干预方法持赞成态度。访谈显示了复杂的决策过程,并强调了学习和实施 CCSH 的个人动机和挑战。实施科学可以揭示与动机、意向和培训相关的因素,这些因素可以通过优化来改善医疗保健牧师干预措施的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-method evaluation of implementation determinants for chaplain intervention in a hospital setting.
Healthcare chaplains address broad social and emotional dimensions of care within a pluralistic religious landscape. Although the development and evaluation of chaplaincy interventions has advanced the field, little research has investigated factors influencing the implementation of new chaplain interventions. In this mixed-method study, we examined attitudes about evidence-based interventions held by chaplain residents (n = 39) at the outset of an ACPE-accredited residency program in the southeast United States. We also used semi-structured interviews (n = 9) to examine residents' attitudes, beliefs, and decision-making processes after they trained in the delivery of a novel manualized intervention, Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health (CCSH). Most residents reported favorable attitudes toward manualized approaches prior to training. Interviews revealed complex decision-making processes and highlighted personal motivations and challenges to learning and implementing CCSH. Implementation science can reveal factors related to motivation, intention, and training that may be optimized to improve the implementation of healthcare chaplaincy interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles based on original research, quality assurance/improvement studies, descriptions of programs and interventions, program/intervention evaluations, and literature reviews on topics pertinent to pastoral/spiritual care, clinical pastoral education, chaplaincy, and spirituality in relation to physical and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信