有用的点击:消费者对在线书评诊断性的感知

B. Piva, Lénia Marques
{"title":"有用的点击:消费者对在线书评诊断性的感知","authors":"B. Piva, Lénia Marques","doi":"10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry.","PeriodicalId":291849,"journal":{"name":"CBR - Consumer Behavior Review","volume":"55 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews\",\"authors\":\"B. Piva, Lénia Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CBR - Consumer Behavior Review\",\"volume\":\"55 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CBR - Consumer Behavior Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CBR - Consumer Behavior Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51359/2526-7884.2024.258115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用混合方法,利用从亚马逊获取的数据,对图书行业的在线反馈系统及其感知诊断性进行了研究。以下几个变量共同构成了客户评论的总体感知诊断性:评分系统、书面文本及其主题以及评论日期。尽管评论偏向正面,但长期负面评论被认为最具诊断性。由于 "早起的鸟儿有虫吃 "和 "赢家圈子有虫吃 "的综合影响,评论时间越长,感知的诊断性就越高。通过了解变量对诊断性的影响,学者们以及电子商务和市场网络管理员可以利用这些研究结果来改进图书行业内外在线平台的反馈系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Helpful clicks: consumers’ perceived diagnosticity of online book reviews
This paper investigates online feedback systems and their perceived diagnosticity in the book industry, using a mixed methods approach, with data retrieved from Amazon. Several variables concur to give the overall perceived diagnosticity of customer reviews: score systems, written text and its themes, and reviews date. Even though reviews are positively biased, long negative reviews are perceived as the most diagnostic. The older the review, the higher the perceived diagnosticity, due to the combined effects of early bird bias and winner circle bias. By understanding the role that variables have on diagnosticity, the findings can be used by scholars, as well as by e-commerce and marketplace webmasters who seek ways to improve the feedback systems of the online platforms in or outside the book industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信