陪审团制度与民主:基于比较法的思考

Junye Chen
{"title":"陪审团制度与民主:基于比较法的思考","authors":"Junye Chen","doi":"10.61173/ddyb0a41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The jury system is one of the most concerned litigation systems in the world. The jury that symbolizes democracy is declining in the common law system. Likewise, the Chinese law circle holds different viewpoints on China’s existing people’s assessor system. The judicial effectiveness of the Anglo-American jury was analyzed, and the relationship between the Anglo-American jury system and judicial democracy was examined in this paper. Moreover, an insight into the existence or abolishment of the people’s assessor system was offered based on its status quo. On this basis, some suggestions were given regarding realizing judicial democracy for China’s existing judicial system without impairing judicial specialization.","PeriodicalId":486045,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies","volume":"20 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jury System and Democracy: A Reflection Based on Comparison Method\",\"authors\":\"Junye Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.61173/ddyb0a41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The jury system is one of the most concerned litigation systems in the world. The jury that symbolizes democracy is declining in the common law system. Likewise, the Chinese law circle holds different viewpoints on China’s existing people’s assessor system. The judicial effectiveness of the Anglo-American jury was analyzed, and the relationship between the Anglo-American jury system and judicial democracy was examined in this paper. Moreover, an insight into the existence or abolishment of the people’s assessor system was offered based on its status quo. On this basis, some suggestions were given regarding realizing judicial democracy for China’s existing judicial system without impairing judicial specialization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":486045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61173/ddyb0a41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61173/ddyb0a41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陪审团制度是世界上最受关注的诉讼制度之一。在英美法系中,象征民主的陪审制度日渐式微。同样,中国法学界对我国现行的人民陪审员制度也持有不同的观点。本文分析了英美陪审制度的司法有效性,探讨了英美陪审制度与司法民主的关系。此外,根据人民陪审员制度的现状,对人民陪审员制度的存废提出了见解。在此基础上,对中国现有司法制度在不损害司法专业化的前提下实现司法民主提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jury System and Democracy: A Reflection Based on Comparison Method
The jury system is one of the most concerned litigation systems in the world. The jury that symbolizes democracy is declining in the common law system. Likewise, the Chinese law circle holds different viewpoints on China’s existing people’s assessor system. The judicial effectiveness of the Anglo-American jury was analyzed, and the relationship between the Anglo-American jury system and judicial democracy was examined in this paper. Moreover, an insight into the existence or abolishment of the people’s assessor system was offered based on its status quo. On this basis, some suggestions were given regarding realizing judicial democracy for China’s existing judicial system without impairing judicial specialization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信