Mohamed Mohamed, Milad Mirshahi, Changzhao Jiang, Hua Zhao, A. Harrington, J. Hall
{"title":"氢气喷射位置的影响:发动机中央直喷和侧喷的实验分析","authors":"Mohamed Mohamed, Milad Mirshahi, Changzhao Jiang, Hua Zhao, A. Harrington, J. Hall","doi":"10.4271/03-17-05-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detailed investigation was carried out on the performance, combustion, and\n emissions of a single-cylinder direct injection hydrogen spark ignition (SI)\n engine with either a side-mounted direct injection (SDI) or a centrally\n installed direct injection (CDI) injector.\n\n \nThe first part of the study analyzed the performance and emissions\n characteristics of CDI and SDI engine operations with different injection\n timings and pressures. This was followed by comparing the engine’s performance\n and emissions of the CDI and SDI operations at different engine speeds and\n relative air-to-fuel ratios (lambda) with the optimized injection pressure and\n timings. Furthermore, the performance and emission attributes of the hydrogen\n engine with the CDI and SDI setups were conducted at a fixed λ value of 2.75\n across a broad spectrum of engine loads.\n\n \nThe study’s main outcome demonstrates that both direct injection systems produced\n near-zero CO2, CO, and HC emissions. Stable engine operations could\n be achieved over a wide range of air-to-fuel ratios by the CDI and SDI setups,\n though the CDI enabled a wider range from stoichiometric to lambda = 3.8. The\n CDI system also offered noticeably higher thermal efficiencies than the SDI\n engine. The study also illustrated the sensitivity of each injection system to\n the variation of the injection pressure and timing and identified the optimum\n operation settings for each system. Finally, the study indicates that the\n emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI are similar at low and mid-load,\n although SDI resulted in both higher NOx and hydrogen emissions than CDI.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogen Injection Position Impact: Experimental Analysis of Central\\n Direct Injection and Side Direct Injection in Engines\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Mohamed, Milad Mirshahi, Changzhao Jiang, Hua Zhao, A. Harrington, J. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/03-17-05-0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A detailed investigation was carried out on the performance, combustion, and\\n emissions of a single-cylinder direct injection hydrogen spark ignition (SI)\\n engine with either a side-mounted direct injection (SDI) or a centrally\\n installed direct injection (CDI) injector.\\n\\n \\nThe first part of the study analyzed the performance and emissions\\n characteristics of CDI and SDI engine operations with different injection\\n timings and pressures. This was followed by comparing the engine’s performance\\n and emissions of the CDI and SDI operations at different engine speeds and\\n relative air-to-fuel ratios (lambda) with the optimized injection pressure and\\n timings. Furthermore, the performance and emission attributes of the hydrogen\\n engine with the CDI and SDI setups were conducted at a fixed λ value of 2.75\\n across a broad spectrum of engine loads.\\n\\n \\nThe study’s main outcome demonstrates that both direct injection systems produced\\n near-zero CO2, CO, and HC emissions. Stable engine operations could\\n be achieved over a wide range of air-to-fuel ratios by the CDI and SDI setups,\\n though the CDI enabled a wider range from stoichiometric to lambda = 3.8. The\\n CDI system also offered noticeably higher thermal efficiencies than the SDI\\n engine. The study also illustrated the sensitivity of each injection system to\\n the variation of the injection pressure and timing and identified the optimum\\n operation settings for each system. Finally, the study indicates that the\\n emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI are similar at low and mid-load,\\n although SDI resulted in both higher NOx and hydrogen emissions than CDI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Engines\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Engines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-05-0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-05-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hydrogen Injection Position Impact: Experimental Analysis of Central
Direct Injection and Side Direct Injection in Engines
A detailed investigation was carried out on the performance, combustion, and
emissions of a single-cylinder direct injection hydrogen spark ignition (SI)
engine with either a side-mounted direct injection (SDI) or a centrally
installed direct injection (CDI) injector.
The first part of the study analyzed the performance and emissions
characteristics of CDI and SDI engine operations with different injection
timings and pressures. This was followed by comparing the engine’s performance
and emissions of the CDI and SDI operations at different engine speeds and
relative air-to-fuel ratios (lambda) with the optimized injection pressure and
timings. Furthermore, the performance and emission attributes of the hydrogen
engine with the CDI and SDI setups were conducted at a fixed λ value of 2.75
across a broad spectrum of engine loads.
The study’s main outcome demonstrates that both direct injection systems produced
near-zero CO2, CO, and HC emissions. Stable engine operations could
be achieved over a wide range of air-to-fuel ratios by the CDI and SDI setups,
though the CDI enabled a wider range from stoichiometric to lambda = 3.8. The
CDI system also offered noticeably higher thermal efficiencies than the SDI
engine. The study also illustrated the sensitivity of each injection system to
the variation of the injection pressure and timing and identified the optimum
operation settings for each system. Finally, the study indicates that the
emissions characteristics of CDI and SDI are similar at low and mid-load,
although SDI resulted in both higher NOx and hydrogen emissions than CDI.